Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations


About Petr

Profile Information

  • OS

Recent Profile Visitors

2,787 profile views

Petr's Achievements



  1. Unfortunately no success: Installed from flash disk from windows environment, the flash disk itself is not bootable on this machine (invalid partition table).
  2. I have several computers with Intel 82574L NIC, both on-board and Intel PRO/1000 CT Desktop Adapter. Wake-On-LAN worked fine on Windows 7. Now I upgraded to Windows 10 and WOL is no longer working. Then I found https://kb.stonegroup.co.uk/index.php?View=entry&EntryID=87 Does anybody know if it is possible to make the WOL working on these boards?
  3. Surprisingly, Windows Update has installed 1909 version on the old Esprimo Q5010 with Intel® Core™ Duo Processor T2300E (Yonah) processor. The second Q5010 I upgraded to Intel® Core™2 Duo Processor T7400 (Merom) and works fine as well.
  4. Coreinfo for Core Duo T2300E shows: X64 - Supports 64-bit mode ... CX16 - Supports CMPXCHG16B instruction ... PREFETCHW - Supports PREFETCHW instruction and Windows 10 up to build 1809 work fine. Between Core Duo (Yonah) and Core 2 Duo (Merom) are the following differences. According to AIDA64, Merom supports the following instructions while Yonah not: 64-bit instructions Supplemental SSE3 CMPXCHG16B INVPCID Virtual Machine Extensions (VMX; Vanderpool) 36-bit Page Size Extension 64-bit DS Area CPL Qualified Debug Store Microsoft has the following requirement for 64-bit version of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 only And the difference between Dothan and Yonah is support of: SSE3 MONITOR / MWAIT Digital Thermometer Enhanced Halt State (C1E) Hard to say, what causes no support of Yonah on 1809 build.
  5. It looks like some hardware platforms are no longer supported by new builds of Windows 10. 1. MSI 915GM Speedster-FA4 with Intel® Pentium® M Processor 750 (Dothan) It works with all builds of Windows 10 up to 1709. Update to 1803 or 1809 ends with error, usually popular IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL error. 2. Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo Q5010 with Intel® Core™ Duo Processor T2300E (Yonah) and 945GM chipset, I have 2 pieces with same behavior It works fine with all builds of Windows 10 up to 1803. Update to 1809 fails, even the boot from the flas ends with blue windows logo and no rotating white circle. Does anybody know what is the reason? Is this valid for all systems with the same configuration or it is just my bad luck? Is there any way how to make build 1809 working on these old pieces of hardware?
  6. Hello, I'm trying to slipstream MP11 to Windows XP using the latest slipsteamer (this is the first time I use it) and both for English and Czech version I receive always this error: WMP11Slipstreamer v0.991 Detected source: Windows™ XP Professional SP2 Hotfixes: windowsmedia11-kb928788-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb929399-v2-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb929773-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb932390-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb933547-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb935551-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb935552-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb939209-x86-intl.exe WindowsMedia11-KB939683-x86-CSY.exe windowsmedia11-kb942264-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb943335-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb944110-x86-intl.exe windowsmedia11-kb944882-x86-intl.exe WindowsXP-KB908536-v2-x86-CSY.exe WindowsXP-KB941569-x86-CSY.exe System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Soubor E:\WXPCS-MP11\i386\wmp11temp\Fixes\WM11\PortableDeviceWMDRM.dll nebyl nalezen. Název souboru: E:\WXPCS-MP11\i386\wmp11temp\Fixes\WM11\PortableDeviceWMDRM.dll v System.IO.__Error.WinIOError(Int32 errorCode, String maybeFullPath) v System.IO.FileInfo.get_Length() v Epsilon.Win32.PeEditor..ctor(String pathToPe) v WMP11Slipstreamer.Backend.standardHotfixApply(String fixesFolder, Dictionary`2 hotfixFileDictionary) v WMP11Slipstreamer.Backend.ApplyFixes() v WMP11Slipstreamer.MainGUI.workerMethod(Object addonSettings) Deleting "E:\WXPCS-MP11\i386\wmp11temp"... Done! The source being modified has not been damaged. All changes have been successfully reverted. Any idea what may be wrong? Regards, Petr
  7. Not all of them, Usbhub20.sys is from SP4. I was able to work with Usbport.sys 5.00.2195.6681 Usbhub20.sys 5.00.2195.6891 Usbehci.sys 5.00.2195.6882 What failures are known? Yes, I have experienced many of BSODs both during installing and when removing the controller in the device manager. I was not able to find any reproducibility, it was just random, both with old and new files. And strange thing, when installed on computer with ICH6 and VIA controller, with VIA USB 2.0 driver installed, Usbport.sys remained the old one (4.90.3000.11) and the other two files were replaced. Unfortunately VIA USB 2.0 driver uses exactly the same file names as this generic driver. Petr
  8. This is very good question. I tried to find some relevant SweetLow's post on forum.ru but I failed. So I tried just to copy newer versions over the old ones. All files form SP4 worked. usbhub20.sys and usbehci.sys from Windows2000-KB838989-x86-ENU.EXE worked too. usbport.sys from Windows2000-KB838989-x86-ENU.EXE caused Windows Protection at Windows startup. Tested on Windows 98 SE, with Intel ICH6 southbridge and VIA VT6212 USB 2.0 controllers, when I wrote "worked" I meant that Kingston USB disk was successfuly recognized and files could be copied in both directions at high speeds. Maybe there are other problems that I have not identified. I had also several blue screens during driver installation but I don't know what was the root cause and it is too late today to continue with experiments. It is really great to see this generic USB 2.0 support. Maybe somebody could proceed full Hardware Compatibility Test to check the driver for any possible problem. BTW, has anybody tried http://sweetlow.at.tut.by/download/umss.zip ? Petr
  9. Even newer fils can be found in hotfix KB843503 or in update KB838989.
  10. Wow, it seems to work! Intel ICH6 chipset + Kingston Elite Data Traveller High Speed, transfer speed 23 MB/s. Now what is the origin of those files? They are not from SP4. Usbport.sys 5.00.2195.5652 is from Q319973, SP4 contains 5.00.2195.6681 Usbehci.sys 5.00.2195.5652 is from Q319973, SP4 contains 5.00.2195.6709 Usbhub20.sys 5.00.2195.6655 - this file is from SP4 Is there any reason not to use all files from Windows 2000 SP4? I tried them and they apparently worked. Here is list of USB 2.0 controllers, I think it is nice when exact detail name is present in the device manager. PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_24CD="Intel(R) 82801DB/DBM (ICH4 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 24CD" PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_24DD="Intel(R) 82801EB (ICH5 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 24DD" PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_25AD="Intel(R) 6300ESB USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 25AD" PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_265C="Intel(R) 82801FB/FBM (ICH6 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 265C" PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_27CC="Intel(R) 82801G (ICH7 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 27CC" PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_283A="Intel(R) 82801H (ICH8 Family) USB2 Enhanced Host Controller - 283A" PCI\VEN_1033&DEV_00E0&REV_02="NEC uPD720100A USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1033&DEV_00E0&REV_04="NEC uPD720101 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1033&DEV_00E0&REV_05="NEC uPD720102 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1033&DEV_00E0="NEC USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1039&DEV_7002="SiS 7002 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3104&REV_51="VIA VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3104&REV_63="VIA VT6212 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3104&REV_82="VIA VT8235 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3104&REV_86="VIA VT8237/A/R USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3104&REV_90="VIA VT8251 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1106&DEV_3104="VIA USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_10B9&DEV_5239="ULi/ALi USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0068="Nvidia nForce2 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0088="Nvidia MCP2A USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00D8="Nvidia nForce3 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00E8="Nvidia nForce3 250 USB 2.0 CEnhanced Host ontroller" PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4345="ATI USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4365="ATI USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4373="ATI SB400 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4373&REV_80="ATI SB450 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_4386="ATI SB600 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller" I suppose somebody could add some more controlers. Petr
  11. I made one some time ago: http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?act=At...st&id=13684 but it is not for mobile chipsets. Petr
  12. AFAIK the are no general SoundMax drivers, all of them are for specific brand only. So there are AD1886A drivers for Asus, AD1886A drivers for IBM, AD1886A drivers for Intel etc. Petr
  13. It should be P5GPL-X SE probably. But There is no support for HD audio in Windows 98. Petr
  14. And I'm simply saying that it is impossible - none of the released hotfixes change OS version number. Please give me any example of hotfix that changes the windows version number. Petr

  • Create New...