Anbima
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Anbima
-
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Anbima replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
What would be the easiest way to do this? -
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Anbima replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Is it possible to disable this in 360Chrome perhaps also by means of a switch or flags at startup? -
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
Anbima replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I have added the following to my filter in uBlock: *.webp With this all webp images should not be displayed. Does this fix the problem? -
For me, Kaspersky AV now quits. Which antivirus would you recommend for XP? What is the new one you wrote about? I would have to renew Kaspersky otherwise.
-
Are you off Windows XP now or are you using a different browser?
-
Here's how it works: [Functions] <existing lines> FileDelete=%Profile%\Default\Cookies FileCopy=%Profile%\Default\Cookies_org|%Profile%\Default\Cookies Cookies_org is in the same folder.
-
Can a file also be copied and deleted in the 360Loader.ini? I could make myself a "master" file "cookies" and then always copy this at startup. For example at [RunAfter] Copy Chrome\User Data\DefaultCookies.org > Chrome\User Data\DefaultCookies Would this work? If so, how?
-
And without extensions? I don't necessarily want to use additional memory.
-
I have set cookies to be deleted on exit. Can I set that the cookies from certain domains are not deleted?
-
With 1030 I have no delay at all. Click and the page is there. In 1030 I now have isolation flag enable and there is no delay.
-
I have now used the (non-rebased) chrome.dll from 1030 in 2036 for testing. It runs, but it also has the delay.
-
Can you please look? I think that for many, faster access is more important than a bit more memory. On 1030 I also use the non-rebased and all the errors I had with other programs are gone.
-
Can you send me the "not rebased" chrome.dll from the 2036?
-
Do you have any idea why there is a delay in accessing web pages or settings with the 2036? Is this perhaps also a setting? Or maybe something is missing in the download? I have re-downloaded and "installed" the 2036 (ungoogeled). It is always the same problem. With 1030 it is not.
-
Yes, that's it. But I had not changed that.
-
This does not exist in my case. Can this be the reason why the browser uses low CPU power?
-
With 2036 I have an intermittent delay when opening a web page (also when opening the settings). I have tested it several times with the 1030 alternating with the 2036 and it is only with the 2036. Can anyone confirm this?
-
What is the "Spare Renderer" tab in 2036?
-
2036 has more processes with the same open tabs and requires more memory. Processes with 1030: Processes with 2036:
-
1030 runs much faster. Why should this not be used?
-
Is there a difference in polyfills between 13.5.2036 and 13.5.1030? Can 2036 do more than 1030? Which polyfills are important now? Maybe these can be listed again in one post so that these can be easily inserted into Tampermonkey.
-
Is there a "leaner" option which only embeds polyfills?
-
What is the easiest and best way to include polyfills?
-
But 360Chrome v13.5 does support SSE3. And with SSE3 it would probably be faster. How can I check if 360Chrome v13.5 has SSE3 active?
-
I have read that the AMD Phenom does not return the SSE3 flag and thus some programs cannot use SSE3. Could this be the reason that the processor is so "slow"? How can I query whether 360Chrome uses SSE3? https://axebase.net/blog/2022/09/05/chromium-fehlendes-sse3-flag/
