Jump to content

D.Draker

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,846

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    172

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    France

 Content Type 

Everything posted by D.Draker

  1. D.Draker
    Sorry, you lost the game. https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=1239053
  2. D.Draker
    Deathline 1997 (Redline) with the King Rutger Hauer.
  3. D.Draker
    First thing that comes to mind: Alcohol 120%, Daemon Tools, basically all virtual CD drive software and mounting, emulation tools, virtual drives. Daemon Tools 3.47 works in Windows 98 SE, that's for sure.
  4. D.Draker
    Registry corruption, like I suspected, did you use un-installers, maybe?
  5. D.Draker
    Driver Store or DRVStore, of course! What about the ones in Catroot folder? I spent a very limited time with XP, on Vista they look the same as on the media, dated 2006 and the such. For example, "windows-legacy-whql.cat" modification date - Sep. 2006.
  6. D.Draker
    That's why I assumed the registry corruption and/or missing MS Authority certs, this was the first logical thing to think of. If only we had a programme similar to DDU (graphics drivers cleanup), the programme which would reinstall the Asmedia driver cleanly, restoring the original windows registry entries before it.
  7. D.Draker
    In theory, those that are "oem" .CAT, should be.
  8. D.Draker
    Could this be of help? https://mywindowshub.com/what-are-catroot-and-catroot2-folders-how-to-reset-the-folder/
  9. D.Draker
    Forgive me for such a simple explanation, I'm sure you know that already, *cat files are issued by drivers manufacturers, and Windows needs to run them by the MS Authority certs to make sure they are the legit WHQL ones. That's how it works. EDIT (how to make your own *cat): https://superuser.com/questions/515653/how-can-i-create-security-catalog-cat-file
  10. D.Draker
    I'm just guessing. Probably they also added the support in the latest Win 10 updates? Though, no precise info about it. Anyways, it won't matter since Chrome itself supports QUIC for a t least several years.
  11. D.Draker
    You're welcome, Dave, those were needed for XP/Vista when the prompt about unsigned HD drivers (Intel) was driving people nuts. Some even used that Authority to install Net framework 4.0 or updates. It's a basic, important set of MS certs. Probably yours were damaged, leading to that annoying prompt. Anyways, it won't hurt your system. The link is official. Needs to run as admin.
  12. D.Draker
    ISP has nothing to do with it. QUIC works through UDP, ISP won't block UDP for obvious reasons.
  13. D.Draker
    Probably this one will work. https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/microsoft-root-certificate-2011cer/4a6aca92-fa7b-40a2-959d-4c440f3ec91d "Hi my name is Ross, I don't specially know which version is required, however you can install this manually if needed, just download the certificate from Microsoft": https://download.microsoft.com/download/2/4/8/248D8A62-FCCD-475C-85E7-6ED59520FC0F/MicrosoftRootCertificateAuthority2011.cer
  14. D.Draker
    Some time ago there was a topic with those backed up files, but got deleted/locked very soon. It restored all of the original Microsoft certificate authority to the state of 2011 (XP).
  15. D.Draker
    Yes, this is very unfortunate. They would be more secure otherwise.
  16. D.Draker
    The same here, no sites use it. I removed thee disable flag and tried several "modern" ones that I could think of.
  17. D.Draker
    Thank you!
  18. D.Draker
    347.88 last stable driver for GT610 (also kepler, just like GT 710) https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/forums/game-ready-drivers/13/214437/34788-last-stable-driver-for-gt610/
  19. D.Draker
    Was the location tag off?
  20. D.Draker
    I don't rely on "user allowed" settings as they come back to default each time when a new profile is made, so I use it via cmd --disable-quic , without quotes of course.
  21. D.Draker
    Thank you for your honest opinion! I'm outta likes for today, unfortunately, that's why I write this in plain words. Glad to be of help, that's the reason I made this topic. It would still be helpful if you voted.
  22. D.Draker
    Don't agree? You're very welcome to vote for No.1 or whatever you like.
  23. D.Draker
    Please specify, where do you see "hostility" from my side? In that article, provided by the actually hostile member, which I merely quoted, the developer himself points out to severe flaws, and I only quoted one. Besides, I made the topic about Google's QUIC implementation, which is clearly shown in the title, not Forefox. Strange you both still didn't read the title.
  24. D.Draker
    This topic is about Google's QUIC implementation, which is clearly shown in the title, yet it obviously doesn't prevent you from posting off-topic and insulting, all as usual with your posts.
  25. D.Draker
    No matter your mood, you're demanded to be respectful on the forum. https://msfn.org/board/guidelines/ And stop insulting once in a while. 7.b This community is built upon mutual respect. You are not allowed to flame other members. People who do not respect personal opinions and/or personal work will be warned in first instance. If you ignore the warning and keep on flaming, you will be banned without notice. You ignored that rule 75389623702702037 times. Good, less dangerous advice. Don't like my topics? Ignore.
×
×
  • Create New...