NotHereToPlayGames

Feel free to research before jumping on some bandwagon blaming this to be "from that country" or only after Opera was sold by Norwegians to Asia. Here is Chrome v24 accessing floppy drive -- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=153763 Here is Chrome v26 accessing floppy drive -- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=173953 Here is Chrome v28 accessing floppy drive -- https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=234318 This is NOT a "from that country" or "sold to the Asians" CONSPIRACY.

Are you referring to this - https://msfn.org/board/topic/180462-my-browser-builds-part-2/?do=findComment&comment=1187101 ? I don't use dark themes but I'm finding over a hundred .css files inside the ft_deepdark.jar file.

Stylus would be a better route to take than Tampermonkey for this sort of task.

It is here. But that page takes a very VERY long time to load. The userscript doesn't actually replace the font until AFTER it fully loads.

Me thinks 720p shall do just fine. No real fire has a crisp and clear distinction between adjacent shades of orange, yellow, red, or blue. And flames aren't as fast-paced as some action flick on the Big Screen. "This fireplace doesn't look real, I've never seen black backgrounds at the campsight show my reflection like this shiny TV and its crisp color ratio." Hmm, maybe that's it, I want my world to look "real" and not like a cartoon. waka waka waka

// ==UserScript== // @name -- Replace Font // @version 0.1 // @exclude https://www.google.com/* // @exclude https://www.bing.com/* // ==/UserScript== var elementList = document.getElementsByTagName('*'); for (var i = elementList.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { var elementItem = elementList; var style = getComputedStyle(elementItem, ''); elementItem.style.fontFamily = style.fontFamily.replace(/Tahoma/i, 'Arial'); elementItem.style.fontFamily = style.fontFamily.replace(/Roboto/i, 'Arial'); }

Bingo! My point precisely!

<dead horse>

That one plays smooth for me in 1080p (its maximum here in 360Chrome, did not check if it goes higher in other browsers). Even on the ancient Core2 Quad Q6700 with 4GB RAM that I am on at the moment. Well, "smooth" other than the actors acting like they are in zero-gravity. At least it "looked like" actors acting and not real NASA footage (didn't watch the whole thing).

Way too early to tell. This is beta. Too quick to judge at this stage of the game. We have all witnessed such "bugs in quality" in very early releases of everything from web browsers to extended kernels to start menu alternatives. Even a Supermium release has this note - "An earlier release of 118.0.5991.0 was withdrawn due to a critical bug specific to Windows 7." We should give the author/creator of this Chrome 115 on XP every benefit of the doubt we give "early releases" of Supermium, extended kernels, StartIsBack, et cetera.

Sorry, this one is not for me. Mileage may vary, of course. But the settings/options is not LOCAL and has to go through the internet. Doesn't mean anything "bad" is going on, it's just "not for me". edit - I didn't even get as far as playing any YouTube videos to even "see" what it does, the non-local options page and donation page popup alone is a showstopper for my liking.

edit - while "funny", this is BETA and we shouldn't "judge too quickly".

Looks impressive and has a very large number of downloads. I plan to try this one later.

Agreed! With this discussion, I spent the last half hour hunting for 1080p+ videos - I could find very few! Yes, 480p to 720p is "huge" and 720p to 1080p is "small". I had to search and search and search to find those rare nuggets of gold for anything higher than 1080p. I guess I literally just don't have a clue as to what to even hunt for. Most require DRM (an assumption, hit with a blank screen saying my browser cannot play the video yet the link tells me my browser IS UP TO DATE [faking UA, of course]) which doesn't work with 360Chrome anyway. I guess I need some reference videos as I can't find them. Just what the heck are you guys watching via YouTube on 360Chrome? I did find a ton of sitcoms from the '80s that I've bookmarked for later enjoyment - but being from the '80s, these were literally 360p MAX, some even MAX'D at 240p.

If you wish to disable Roboto font in Tampermonkey's own GUI - 1) Chrome -> User Data -> Default -> Extensions -> [Tamerpermonkey 32char folder] -> [Tamermonkey version folder] -> style.css >>> REPLACE font-family:"Roboto" with font-family:"Arial" 2) Chrome -> User Data -> Default -> Extensions -> [Tamerpermonkey 32char folder] -> [Tamermonkey version folder] -> style.css >>> REPLACE @font-face{font-family:"LocalRoboto" with @font-face{font-family:"DISABLED-Roboto"

This works for me at https://everydrop-counts.org/ml (but it will not fix the Roboto font used in chrome://flags or Tampermonkey's own GUI) - // ==UserScript== // @name -- Replace Font // @version 0.1 // @include * // ==/UserScript== var elementList = document.getElementsByTagName('*'); for (var i = elementList.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { var elementItem = elementList; var style = getComputedStyle(elementItem, ''); elementItem.style.fontFamily = style.fontFamily.replace(/Roboto/i, 'Arial'); }

Okay, I can replicate. (for reference: https://everydrop-counts.org/ml ) I assume that you also have these ugly fonts at chrome://flags/ - correct? If yes, that you have these ugly fonts both on web pages that you visit and at chrome://flags then the issue is Roboto font-family. This font-family is hard-coded in chrome.dll and it is easily replaced with arial but you would still need a Tampermonkey/Stylus type of fix to replace Roboto on web sites that you visit.

I haven't tried that one yet. YouTube really isn't my thing - not by a LLOOONNNGG shot. I kind of "don't get it", to be perfectly honest. It is nice for background NOISE when at work, but why do I need anything higher than 480p when it's there for the NOISE and NOT the video ??? When I want to watch a MOVIE, the LAST thing I run to is a phone, laptop, tablet, or desktop computer. Not even the computer I have that runs on a 4K 55" television's HDMI because that 55" television also has a Roku on a different HDMI input. Though to be fair, I think the Roku's output is only 1080p. So no, to each their own, of course, but nope, I'll never "get" why anyone would use YouTube to watch anything of resolution-importance. But again, "to each their own". I guess I would think that all these people that play 1080p YouTube videos on XP-era hardware would have FRIED that hardware by now, just way too much to be asking of that hardware (in my opinion).

You should note that it is a beta version of what is planned to be a paid-for product. It is not planned to be a "free web browser".

lol, truth be told I started doing that on my local archives back when MSFN had a GIGANTIC "donate money or risk MSFN shutting down" banner plastered on the forum. I had (still visit) a couple other forums on standby in case MSFN did shut down.

Is it GUI fonts or web site fonts that you are wanting to be different? If web site fonts -- https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/453435-%E5%85%A8%E5%B1%80%E8%8B%B9%E6%96%B9/code https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/419363-%E5%85%A8%E5%B1%80%E5%BE%AE%E8%BD%AF%E9%9B%85%E9%BB%91/code https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/419362-%E5%85%A8%E5%B1%80%E6%80%9D%E6%BA%90%E9%BB%91%E4%BD%93/code If GUI fonts - Display Properties -> Appearance -> Advanced -> Message Box - font, size, bold, and italic all work, I have not tried to get the color setting to work - 360Chrome must be closed when applying these changes --

Try enabling DirectWrite via chrome://flags.

Agreed. Though I would reword that to say third-party javascript. (no space, I read java scripts with a space and think Java code) MSFN tends to be the "net savvy" crowd that don't allow third-party javascripts "willy-nilly".

I find 1030 to manage RAM much better than 2036. I have also had disappearing fonts in 2036. Extremely rare and only while editing Stylus userstyles. But have never had disappearing fonts in 1030. There is no "night and day" difference between the two, I just find 1030 to be much more MATURE and STABLE of a product, with nothing "added" upstream that we here at MSFN just remove anyway. 1030 on the left. 2036 on the right. Two identical VMs with identical tasks performed in 1030 versus 2036. ie, note Process Hacker reporting Page Faults - in a perfect world, this number would be ZERO. 2036 will "fault" twice as often as 1030.