Jump to content

Iron_Wind0ws

Member
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic Of

About Iron_Wind0ws

Profile Information

  • OS
    XP Pro x86

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Iron_Wind0ws's Achievements

8

Reputation

  1. No, I swear, I don't use any VPN extension or program, it's very strange.
  2. @dmiranda I have tried to register several times in that forum, but I always get this xD
  3. Hi everyone around here, I tried to test the new version of @win32, it says it is already compatible with Windows XP, but it closes immediately, why is this happening to me? These are the minimum requirements To use Supermium browser, you'll need: * Windows XP SP3 or later or Windows Server 2003 SP2 or later * 768 Mb of ram * An Intel Pentium 4 processor or later that's SSE2 capable. Hyper-threading or dual-core recommended. But I have 1gb of ram and a 1-core processor, Intel Celeron 346 3.06GHz Version 121.0.6167.81 https://www.win32subsystem.live/supermium.html https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v121
  4. Well, ok, thanks for that suggestion, anyway I plan to keep using 360Chrome until it really stops working on many sites.
  5. Hi, I have followed your instructions and tried closing and opening the browser several times, but it still does not work. I have performed the following steps: *I have opened the Task Manager and terminated all Chrome.exe processes. *I tried to start the browser, but it still does not open correctly, as shown in the screenshots. I have also tried downloading "XPChrome V1.0.7z" again and adding it to the path C:\ and nothing And I do not think I have problems with windows, I have installed three browsers, 360Chrome, Basilisk and Mypal68. I do not think it is hardware problems right? because I have 1gb of ram xd.
  6. Wow, I'm really glad another Chrome for XP is in the works , I'll keep an eye out for that. Well, I had read in another forum regarding the same Chromiun, that before it expires, that possibly, we had to use the "RunAsDate" program, is that true, can I put here the source of that other forum?
  7. Oh, excuse me, I didn't know there was another thread. Well, I have already tried to extract M115xp in C:\ and nothing, still the same :'(
  8. No, it is an Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 3.06GHz. Yes, I also agree that YouTube has become bigger and less efficient over time, that's why when I open a video or audio, I usually raise the priority of that single "Utility: Audio Service" process in 360Chrome.
  9. Hello everyone, I wanted to share with you a news that I found interesting: recently I was exploring on Reddit and I saw that a user has published a Chromiun 115 for Windows XP without the need to install One Core Api. I tried to run it, but was unsuccessful. However, the developer of the project claims that the browser works correctly in most cases. I leave you the link to the source so you can explore it and try it yourself: https://www.reddit.com/r/windowsxp/comments/17x01mo/chromium_115_running_on_windows_xp_without_one/ I hope you find this information useful. Best regards,
  10. Hey howdy, Do you know if by doing these steps correctly, it will open Steam 2019 for me, which is the latest version compatible with XP? Because I'm trying to log in, but the interface doesn't open.
  11. Hello friends, I wanted to tell you that the translator no longer works, I am currently using version 13.5.2036 rebuild 1, I tried with version, 13.5.1030 rebuild 7 regular and Chrome 49.0.2623.112, what could be happening?
  12. Excuse me, could you tell me what is the latest version compatible with XP? I understand the latest one is "PotPlayerSetup-210209.exe" downloaded from "videohelp.com" or is there a newer one.
  13. @Milkinis Oh men, thank you very much, hahaha I was a little scared , this version runs excellent. Now another question, is it safe to continue with this rebuild or do I wait for a new modified version to come out? Yes, I know that having 1 GB of ram is not very recommendable XD.
  14. Hello @NotHereToPlayGames @Milkinis I have already tried with a modified version of the browser, and well, I still see a high ram consumption, I tried with version 13.0.2310.0 by Humming Owl, I didn't want to test with much older versions because I feel I will have the same problem and errors with certain pages. I really don't understand why this is happening!
×
×
  • Create New...