NotHereToPlayGames

You need to polyfill the Object.hasOwn function. // ==UserScript== // @name Inject Object.hasOwn() Polyfill [93] // @version 0.0.1 // @match *://*/* // @run-at document-start // @grant none // ==/UserScript== if (!Object.hasOwn) { Object.defineProperty(Object, "hasOwn", { value: function (object, property) { if (object == null) { throw new TypeError("Cannot convert undefined or null to object") } return Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(Object(object), property) }, configurable: true, enumerable: false, writable: true }) }

Can you show us your "error console"?

I'd suspect nullish coalescing operators at equally.ai also. This is actually quite clever, if you ask me. Use nullish coalescing operators in your "cookie consent" javascript so that people using browsers that do not support nullish coalescing operators "think" they are setting a cookie-consent setting but in fact are not.

Ah, your original post sited equalli.ai and so I only hunted for that within the trendmicro scripts and of course did not find equalli.ai with an "i" versus with a "y". Already at work now so don't have my "utilities" at hand.

That's what it is, the trendmicro site is using "hundreds" of nullish coalescing operators (??) that Firefox 52.9 does not support! Which is also to me the PERFECT EXAMPLE of WHY some of us INTENTIONALLY like to use OLDER BROWSERS and dislike the constant thumping of "why are you using Browser X, it's already 3 months old"

I don't get any calls to equalli.ai. But the site works for me because I do block the several third-party scripts. Which I assumed that uBO did by default? (I do not use uBO and highly prefer uMatrix) It should also be pointed out that the trendmicro website is VERY POORLY WRITTEN. It is improper HTML Coding to place scripts ABOVE the head tag. And this site has FIVE of them - THREE alone pertaining to "cookie consent". (which I block via "I still don't care about cookies" extension but these don't make it past third-party scripts already being blocked)

I would actually guess the other way around. That Firefox 52.9 is seeing some form of script that it simply doesn't recognize.

Have not digged into it yet but I'm suspecting cross-site / cross-origin (which I don't think Chrome v49 can even "distinguish" and would have to research if NM28/St52 can "distinguish"). Would also be a reason why Incognito with uBO enabled also has success. I kinda can't dig into until over the weekend or so. But my gut-feeling is cross-site / cross-origin.

Works for me - but only if traffic is flowing through Proxomitron (bypassed or not doesn't matter). My hunch is that it's "certificate-related". But can't prove it from here at work.

Working in my 13.5.1030 also. No clue whose 360Chrome is pictured above Dixel's (which I have also but perhaps not up-to-date) - the "speedup" and "themes" icons in the lower right corner are none of my versions.

Normal. So does Ungoogled Chromium, so does Serpent 52, those were the only two I tried before leaving the house. If you don't want stuff happening in the background, and forgive the Captain Obvious statement, then you must NOT keep things open in the background. It's that simple. When you are not "using" a program, CLOSE IT.

You are not fully understanding what "Process Profiling" is and there is a reason that Process Monitor does not enable this by default for non-advanced users.

Not true.

I know, I use Ungoogled. I abandoned Supermium when it became perfectly clear that "ungoogled" is not in its future. But on the "portable" front and LOGGED-IN SESSIONS carrying from one computer to the next, folks have been "debating" that for over THIRTY years! It is "neat" that Ungoogled found a way around that when creator-defined "portable" browsers have 'overlooked' that for DECADES. But it's also a "feature" that I do not use nor do I want. That is why we have HUNDREDS of different browsers to choose from, "one size will NEVER fit all".

I have never allowed ANY web browser to "keep passwords", so this it technically does not do - but I also DO NOT want it to. But YES, all of my extensions and all of my extensions' settings carry from one computer to the next. If you are familiar with "ThinStall" (or was it called "ThinApp"?) from a decade or so ago, that's basically what JauntePE is. It can "portablize" pretty much anything - but there is a learning curve. I also have JauntePE'd versions of every version of Microsoft Office dating back to 1995. Well, "every" version that I own - '95, '97, 2000, XP, 2003, 2007, and 2010. Haven't tried to JauntePE-ify Office 365 (kind of doubt that is possible).

I've already completely "portablized" Supermium but it's still completely useless to me since it will not be offering an "ungoogled" version. To "portablize" I use an oldie but goodie called JauntePE which I put in the same class as Proxomitron (ie, too complex for anybody that hasn't already heard of them).

I have not tried so forgiveness in advance. Offering as a curiosity and to advance the discussion. Most Chromium Forks can be started with a startup commandline parameter to set the profile directory. If you carry that startup commandline parameter and set the profile to reside in the same directory, does it become "portable" then? Bear in mind, "portable" has different meanings to some folks - ie, some LOG INS do not carry from one computer to the next even if the "profile" by all other definitions "does".

It's not the answer you are wanting, lol. I have not but I wouldn't call it forgotten either. My preferred focus at the moment is bringing a "tab manager" function next to the min/max/restore/close title bar icons similar to that which is seen in Ungoogled Chromium. Ungoogled Chromium v114: I will likely not implement the "search tabs", not sure yet. Easily done for Open Tabs, not sure of effect on Recently Closed. The unfortunate side-effect is that 360Chrome's Extension Manager, Download Manager, Search Bar, Bookmark Menu, and Restore Closed Tabs are all effected just by implementing a "tab manager" function. Ignore all the title bar icons to the left of the dropdown, those are window manager icons for shuffling programs around on five-monitor setup.

You are trying to install Manifest v3 extensions and 360Chrome does not support Manifest v3.

Easiest would be to tell us what the addon is so we can dig into it that way.

Without an extensive search/verification, this seems date to July thru August time frame of the year 2000. It is a P3 and SSE was introduced in 1999 with the Pentium III. SSE2 was introduced in 2000 with the Pentium 4. That said, I personally do not know what the "-sse" variants of the UXP browsers really means. Your PC can/should be able to use SSE but not SSE2. Unknown if these UXP browsers have an SSE without SSE2 and seems to me you can/should be using SSE.

Nothing "against" newer versions. I've technically never even tried the newer versions. My philosophy is to never ever EVER allow any any ANY software to auto-update and manual updates only follow the principle of "if it ain't broke, DON'T FIX IT".

Use a systray program called "Caffeine". Works for XP, Vista, Win7, and Win10, I've used it in all of them. Some programs/OSes might require non-default "Caffeine" settings that change the fake keypress being used.

Nice Weppy Pun!