NotHereToPlayGames

I need actual URLs. I've yet to encounter ANY web site that Chromium v86 can't handle. Not claiming they don't exist. Just saying we need a LIST for future reference. Note that some web sites INTENTIONALLY will not load properly unless you enable WebGL because I disable this on purpose.

Works for me, lol. Like I say, I don't visit the Funny Farm that often, just not my cup of tea.

No clue how old Mr. D.Draker is. But all I'm hearing here is "ego" or something. He always struck me as low 30s so dating a 27yr old seems about right. But now I'm wondering if he's mid 20s and dating somebody older but looking for somebody younger. So is the post about dating a 27yr old some sort of "brag" for dating somebody older? How are we to read it? Unsure as I would personally never put that sort of detail on MSFN. This is not Facebook, lol, and I don't do Facebook. I certainly hope he's not in his 40s and posting that he's looking for a 20yr old. Another "brag"? Who knows, to each their own. Which I guess leaves him perhaps in his 20s and not liking that his current girlfriend is older and more mature, so he's looking for somebody 20, younger, and less mature than himself. But post that on MSFN? Again, this isn't Facebook. And I'm very very confused by the "her parents need to be dead" comment. A 20yr old whose parents are dead, her parents died "tragically", not of "old age" or "natural causes", but *tragically*. And to have been dead a "very long time" would have put that future girlfriend where, 6yrs old, 10yrs old, 15yrs old? Very very "formative" years in one's "upbringing" to go through the pain of tragically losing her parents. But yeah, my "left brain" is taking over and being far too "analytical" for some "blurb" regarding a 27yr old girlfriend that doesn't fit the bill, that a 20yr old would be better suited, and that the 20yr old had better not have any surviving parents trying to "parent" the new boyfriend. I guess this is just what the "Funny Farm" is all about, I don't really trek down here too often.

I can assure you that it was not "concern".

I do not own a phone. No land line. No cell phone. No phone of any kind. I don't own anything Android.

Works for me. Perhaps you have something like UBO making it not work for you?

Sounds like a very VERY tiny intersection. Like somebody whose mother died while giving birth and whose father died in a car crash or drug overdose. I was well into my 50s when my parents both passed within a year of each other. None of my siblings are anywhere near "no more than 20". You may want to cast a wider net. Or just admit you prefer living single.

I can say that I hereby have no plans to undertake any Catsxp-based project. I am extremely thankful that a "new" Chrome/Chromium Fork has risen to the challenge of maintaining functionality with Win7 that does not require an Extended Kernel and will keep an eye on it as a possible future project. But when it comes right down to it, there are better performing options available to the Vanilla Win7 crowd. Yet I also say this not knowing any web site examples that "work" in Chrome v110 but do not work in Chrome v96 - I'd rather run a "slightly older" variant and have improved performance than use "cutting edge" but take the performance hit. Win7 Enterprise SP1 - 360Chrome v13.5 build 1030 == 56.5 Ungoogled Chromium v86 == 67.3 Catsxp v3.2.4 == 68.7 GDIChromium v96 == 96.3

That it did, lol. I do read *EVERY* post in this thread - despite migrating to Chromium Forks over the years.

Really does not mean a dang thing. I personally find the browser "padlock" 'system' more of a NUISANCE than a 'feature' that "saves me" from dark crevices I would otherwise fall into. https://www.ipswitch.com/blog/https-and-a-padlock-does-not-mean-a-website-is-secure

Agreed, same here. So far (knock on wood), I can still do EVERYTHING on XP. But the writing is on the wall, that "window" is closing fast.

Because you are on XP. I just IGNORE this when I'm on XP. Others have jumped through hoops of importing "certificates" BUT THIS WILL NOT SOLVE THIS COMPLETELY (on XP), so I don't bother with these "imported" certificates. Others that do use those updated certificates may chime in.

I download all of my extensions from here - https://www.crx4chrome.com/ I've "never" actually installed via Chrome Web Store. There are some extensions that convert the Chrome Web Store's "install" to a "download" instead, I don't recall what they are offhand. Very rarely do I use an extension "as-is" (I remove non-English languages, I break phone-home telemetry, I disable auto-update, I edit js/css, et cetera).

Yikes, what a process! I myself prefer build 1030 and do not use 2022 either. It's always a good idea to keep your own archive of your extension .crx files.

Could you expand on this, please? Thanks in advance.

Possibly. Unsure as of yet. Catsxp will be a "godsend" for those of you that like "dark mode". My primary focus as a backburner project has been to "ungoogle" GDIChromium v96 (there are 458 strings within chrome.dll that need modified one at a time and I cannot fully test until I've performed all 458). I am aware that there is a v103 but I prefer v96 based on performance metrics.

And even MORE IMPORTANTLY (to me at least) is that they also maintained the ability to Disable DirectWrite.

I did not try the 111 beta yet. I was in-process of trying 3.2.4 when you posted. And YES, I can confirm that it is v110 and it DOES work on vanilla Win7 [no extended kernels, no POSReady-whatever-they-call-them-for-7] (I have a strong dislike toward "extended" kernels, but I applaud their role in the tech-savvy community).

No clue. I work in Engineering and follow the "back up often" motto. I've never had them disappear, but I also do not use session-restore.

Previous post was in reply to this one. Forgot to hit "Quote".

Everyone has their own hobbies. I've never been a fan of anything AGT or any of the knockoffs of AGT. In my view, if the television series falls under the category of "reality tv", then it has NOTHING to do with "reality" and I move on to the next channel.

Any of the Chrome Web Store extensions will work for setting up a default new tab. You can also design your own "local" new tab. Just .zip all of your self-made new tab html files to a file called newtab.zip and place it in the same folder as chrome.dll.

That would be a NIGHTMARE for my way of doing things. I block iframes and those "preview" boxes are done via iframes. I would have to bypass several walls of defense just to see the "preview" box. Same goes for when a few members post "nocookie" YouTube liks. And since I have to bypass several walls of defense, I just move on and consider the topic not worth my time - which "most" of the time is an accurate assessment.

Me too!

Agreed! I had to internet-search this one a good dozen times or so before it finally "sunk in" and MSFN posts that used it were always "confusing" until it FINALLY "sunk in". https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/tldr-meaning-acronym/