NotHereToPlayGames

I don't really look at it that way. If it were my BANK not working, then I would classify it as "security". I always ponder PRIVACY RIGHTS if a web site needs something that my browser isn't providing. None of these types of things ever make any sense to me! Web sites that use "cloudflare" captchas and cite "security" - I have never once ran across a BANK LOGIN that has to pass a cloudflare captcha !!!

I only upgrade if Speedometer 2.1 reveals newer to be faster. My preference has been v136. v137 is within margin of error so I never bothered to upgrade to v137. v138 and v139 took major hits and DECREASED scores, so no interest in either. v140, v141, and v142 are indeed faster based on Speedometer scores (and others, it's just the easiest to get a score). My next (once I do upgrade) will be v141. Then keep it until it "needs" upgraded. I really really REALLY prefer to stick with ONE and not update every (feel like) three days! The web site being discussed here isn't going to be enough to get me to upgrade, but it is probably writing on the wall that my v136 will have to soon be replaced.

Interesting! That is my official "first site" ever that v136 is apparently too old for.

That web site does not work in Official Chrome v136 on Win10. And does not work in Supermium v126 in XP x86. Personally, I am *AFRAID* to even try to intentionally make it work when it doesn't work with "real" Chrome. Also, I spent the better part of an hour trying to figure out HOW to get "yt-dlp" to work (XP x86 VM with Supermium v126)! I will not be spending more time on "yt-dlp"! The "installation instructions" are far too complex (or I'm looking in the wrong spot!) for me to dig THAT DEEP into something that my lifestyle WILL NEVER USE beyond assisting somebody else that does use it. Sorry, I really have absolutely NO USE in downloading from YouTube. NONE. "Te each their own", of course.

I use this to fix the context menu -- https://github.com/rikka0w0/Taskbar-Context-Menu-Tweaker At least something very similar or a version prior to being hosted on GitHub, as my version is dated 2016 (and if it ain't broke, don't fix it).

I clearly haven't been following close enough. I have no "d#mn clue" as to just what LibreWolf-ified means. I know what LibreWolf is (tried it several years ago, didn't like it, deleted it, never looked back).

I haven't heard anything. The recent Eclipse Community discussion seemed to be developmental proposals on the direction the project was headed. There were some outspoken disapprovals of those proposals. But it didn't come across as "hyper-critical" or anything like that. But sometimes you never know, it is his project and maybe he just got tired of those "disapprovals". I kind of doubt it, and hate to "speculate". I'm sure we'll know more soon...

I shall wait for a user of YouTube-DLP to assist. I have never used this and there is a LARGE following. I would think several of them would jump in. It is possible that you will gain more traction with a dedicated "Extension for YouTube-DLP" thread. I would think several would join in the new thread that aren't even seeing this in a Supermium thread. Granted, YouTube-DLP has been on my "To Do List", but very VERY far down on that list. I'll get to it... Eventually...

ie, it is *VERY* likely that one of those "Open in VLC Player" extensions CAN BE MODIFED to INCLUDE different programs. I've done it in the past! Granted, Chrome is much more "secure" than it was with v86, but I'm still confident that if an extension can send a media file to VLC Player, then IT CAN ALSO send other files to other programs. All via *ONE* extension.

You can do that in Chromium-based extensions also. That is why I keep asking for details on just WHAT you want to do. I ran an extension in 360Chrome (based on Chrome v86) that had an extension to open .pdf files via whatever was associated at the OS level for .pdf files (Adobe Acrobat v9.5.5 is what I was using at the time). I modified that ONE extension to not only open .pdf files, but send .txt files to Notepad++, .xls files to Excel 2000, .xlsx files to Excel 2007, and .bin files to a program for modifying aftermarket turbos. So what you want *CAN* be done. You just keep dancing around giving us the DETAILS to adequately assist. If you cannot reveal the PROGRAM that you are wanting to send something to, then I'm afraid I cannot even START in seeking a possible solution. Doesn't mean I *have* a solution, but you really aren't even letting me know WHERE TO START.

YES IT IS, if you really want us to seek out a solution. There are a *TON* of Chrome extensions taylored to VLC Player. ONE example -- https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/open-in-vlc-media-player/kbonopecbfhedlfpaphndlaoppmdppim?hl=en Then browse the "related" and then browse the related's "related". *TONS* of them. Though I myself have not used any of them to speak towards any recommendation.

That is my understanding. Admins [plural] have been cited in this thread, so if any violations were made, the thread would have been locked. Anything beyond that is really all just "personality clashes" and one set of rules attempted to be forced upon a subset of "liked contributions" and a different set of rules attempted to be forced upon a subset of "disliked contributions". Strictly speaking as a third-party. I'm not a fan of these types of programs, but as far as I can tell, you didn't do anything at all different than other members here have done in the past. You are a fan of something not hosted here, and you came here to discuss with your MSFN Family. Personally, in my opinion, things like "extended kernels" have always been a very fine line. To the best of my knowledged, MSFN has never allowed direct links to their downloads as they violate MICROSOFT licensing terms. Admins have the last word, of course.

Works for me...

There are also Chromium extensions to open "local files". So in short, you kind of need to tell us just what you are trying to open, instead of vague generality of "Open With".

There are Chromium extensions to send URLs to Edge and Firefox, among many other things (VLC Player, PDF Viewer, Google Docs, etc). So "yes and no"... You can send URLs, but maybe not thru "Open With".