Jump to content

mina7601

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,792

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Egypt

 Content Type 

Everything posted by mina7601

  1. mina7601
    Thanks, done.
  2. mina7601
    Oh, thanks for the information, sorry @Mathwiz.
  3. mina7601
    I got 21%. Too sad they don't support Adblock Plus.
  4. mina7601
    52.9, not 52.6.
  5. mina7601
    Already reported and it will be fixed next version. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/245
  6. mina7601

    Hello!

    mina7601 replied to pioj's topic in Introduce Yourself!

    Welcome to MSFN, Carlos!
  7. mina7601
    Mine doesn't even redirect to that web page, just stays on a blank screen with a black frame around it. Tried in both Serpent 52/55.
  8. mina7601
    Can confirm, it just shows a blank screen with a black frame around it. Changing user agent did not help.
  9. mina7601
    Oh my, that's wow! Enjoy latest Chromium in your XP PC, and I hope it's running smooth, and that you are not facing any crashes at all.
  10. mina7601
    Though, you can restore the old context menu with the help of this guide: https://pureinfotech.com/bring-back-classic-context-menu-windows-11/
  11. mina7601
    That's one of the things I also hate about Windows 11. They did this basically to match Windows 11 design principles. They still allow the legacy context menu to be opened by pressing Shift while right clicking.
  12. mina7601
    Your statement was a reply to @VistaLover, which has a link to an old post of mine, so I am still mentioned anyway. Yes, I didn't use the tag, and I know this topic is about roytam1's browsers, but does that mean my post isn't off-topic? Of course not, it's still off-topic. My sincerest apologies to roytam1 for this mess happening in your topic...
  13. mina7601
    Have you tried the rebased DLLs mentioned here? And BTW, we should move our discussion to that linked topic, since this topic is about Chrome 115 for XP, and we are talking about Supermium, which is OT for this topic...
  14. mina7601
    Oh, and I was talking about the current Adblock Plus from its homepage https://adblockplus.org/en/download for my browser Chrome on my Windows 11, not the legacy Adblock Plus for roytam1's browsers, hence the <Offtopic> tag added by @nicolaasjan.
  15. mina7601
    No, no, no, I never said that, and don't even plan to do that at all. In fact, I actually find using old OSes like XP or Vista (and even 2000, if we are to go to the mimimum of Older NT-Family OSes) very fun. Please, don't assume stuff I don't plan to say. Also, I don't disrespect your own reasons for not wanting to use something, so please, kindly respect my own reasons for not wanting to use something. Thanks.
  16. mina7601
    That + too advanced for me to use. BTW, I really have no problem with using old stuff, but I mean, when it's something that gets an update after a month or so (like the case with uBO Legacy), and it stops getting updates suddenly, without even specifying this will be the last version, then that's what worries me, but I didn't really stop using uBO because of what "old" means to people. No, really, I didn't.
  17. mina7601
    For me, it doesn't even run, only crashes with no error message, and generates a crash dump. But, I already know why it crashes: because it requires 2 CPU cores, and I only have 1 CPU core. The next release of Supermium will fix that.
  18. mina7601
    Unfortunately, I am not a uBO user, but thanks anyway. Would it actually be possible with Adblock Plus? Since that's what I use.
  19. mina7601
    Hmm yes, much better, thanks!
  20. mina7601
    Google is your friend: over-exaggeration meaning Yes, there is: under-exaggeration meaning
  21. mina7601
    Yes, they showed up. Anyway: Yes, it is that blue pane. It's called common tasks, it's not tabs. I think I saw somewhere on MSFN a method of bringing this shell to XP, but I don't remember where was it. Will need to search for it.
  22. mina7601
    Yes, I perfectly understand that like me you don't want to use uBO. I am just saying that the userscript manager solution is much easier in my opinion, and that it's the solution I had so much luck with, my apologies, forgot to clarify that in my post.
  23. mina7601
    Not only is this solution very old as said above, I didn't have so much luck with it. It only made a few Discourse-based forums work, and others still remained broken as they are. I, however, had so much luck with this solution > Link (the userscript manager method) It was much easier for me to apply, and it made ALL Discourse-based forums work.
  24. mina7601
    @FantasyAcquiesce Thanks, and what about this question?
  25. mina7601
    You want DirectX 6 itself? You can get it from oldversion.com. http://www.oldversion.com/windows/directx-6-0 Edit: Oh wait, you are talking about the End-User Runtime. Would this one work for you? https://legacyupdate.net/download-center/download/7104/directx-end-user-runtimes-3
×
×
  • Create New...