
VistaLover
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by VistaLover
-
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
... You "sound" surprised ; if you please read more carefully previous posts in this thread and/or inspect related commits in Roytam1's GitHub repository (as the result of Mathwiz's PRs), you'd realise ONLY NM28/UXP and (some of) Serpent52/UXP "Help" entries were altered... If, OTOH, you are truly asking for Mail News's "Help" entries to be modified, that's a different matter; AFAICT, @roytam1 hasn't published a forked Binary Outcast GitHub repository (unlike his UXP one!) one can then re-fork and submit the necessary PR... He, of course, can do this in his local BO repo, if he agrees to your requests... NB: I am NOT a user of any of the BO forks (nor will I choose to be )... -
Actually, this is NOT accurate; Avast does provide 19.x versions of their Free Antivirus flavour; e.g. if you navigate to https://www.avast.com/download-thank-you.php?product=FAV-AVAST&locale=en-gb you will end up downloading from: https://bits.avcdn.net/productfamily_ANTIVIRUS/insttype_FREE/platform_WIN/installertype_FULL/build_RELEASE which, once on disk (337 MB, off-line setup), can be verified to be of file version 19.4.4318.0. But versions 19.x require Win7+, the version you have installed (18.8) is the last supported one on Vista/Server2008 ... Cheers
- 1,239 replies
-
- Server 2008
- software
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
... I understand this was a change implemented on a platform level, so I'm not sure as to if/how what I suggest below is feasible, but what would be best, IMHO, is to implement the upstream change ONLY to New Moon (application/palemoon) and NOT implement it on Serpent (application/basilisk); removing the "force-enable e10s" feature on NM should be favourable, because force-enabling e10s on PM/NM, even for testing purposes, will produce a totally broken/unresponsive browser (as the internal e10s supporting code is non-existent in PM/NM); just my 2 eurocents, of course -
If you have access to a Win7+ computer, then consider installing KAF19 (Kaspersky AntiVirus Free) on your off-line XP machines ( as suggested by @BTTB ) and then use latest Kaspersky Update Utility on the on-line Win7+ machine to download latest KAF19 definitions: The "def" files can be then transferred to the XP machines via, e.g., a USB flash stick and then installed via a process probably detailed in the Kaspersky Support Site (or just Google/Bing/DDG for it ). EDIT: Support link => https://support.kaspersky.com/11705 Unfortunately, latest KUU v3.2.0.153 is build on Qt 5.8 framework, which requires Win7+ (thus, I can't test it here on Vista... ). EDIT2: Last XP+Vista compatible version of KUU is v3.1.0.25 (built on Qt 4.6); official download link (retrieved via web.archive.org ): updateutility_win_3.1.0.25_release_en.zip Once run for the first time, start an update to populate the "Applications" list with latest KAF entries...
-
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@Mathwiz's PRs have been now merged into @roytam1's custom UXP branch, expect to see the changes landing in tomorrow's NM28/St52 builds... On another note, the few (?) of you running Serpent 52.9.0 in forced multiprocess (e10s) mode ( @Mathwiz, still doing this? ), will soon be unable to continue this practice, considering the upstream dev has patched that loophole: https://github.com/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/1130 https://github.com/MoonchildProductions/UXP/commit/19c0f5e -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@TechnoRelic I have already made my position very clear in the matter at hand, in previous posts of this thread: I feel totally indifferent to the whole re-branding issue, in fact I am quite alright with how things were/are now; @roytam1 is NOT compiling builds with the official branding, this is crystal clear; the whole re-branding argument has been always pushed by MCP and/or Matt A. Tobin; I am not confused in any way as to what I am using on my Vista laptop currently ; I might sound harsh, but Roy is NOT to blame whenever some NM/Serpent user knocks on MCP's door; the fault lies, IMHO, solely on those users, who can't tell their right hand from their left one (and, as said already, full rebranding won't relieve MCP of random NM users and/or make them think about us - maintainer+users - in another way; for them, we'll always remain XP+Vista freaks ) ... The recent PRs by @Mathwiz were submitted after you have, apparently, taken sides with MCP/M.A.T in your recent post ; you have yourself appointed only myself and Mathwiz as the users who should be consulted about your "re-branding" expectations, but this leaves out numerous other NM/St users who might not be as vocal in the forums here, but their own opinion should also carry weight... Mathwiz created his PRs as an interim and "easy" solution, with the hopeful aim of deterring additional NM users from seeking support at MCP's HQs; twice you said "is FINE with me", but it now becomes apparent, even after the PRs have been created, that you won't feel satisfied unless a full rebranding takes place: in other words, in your own subtle way, you are coercing @roytam1 to proceed into full re-branding, echoing MCP/M.A.T 's agenda... Roy shouldn't be forced to make any additional efforts, he's working wonders as it is, regularly providing browser builds for a plethora of older OSes/platforms... And this is my final say on this... -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
This is a tough one to solve ; selecting in Serpent 52.9.0 "Help => Keyboard Shortcuts" is, code-wise, contained in: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/blob/master/application/basilisk/base/content/baseMenuOverlay.xul#L55-L56 <menuitem id="menu_keyboardShortcuts" oncommand="openHelpLink('keyboard-shortcuts')" The code to execute the command is contained within: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/blob/master/application/basilisk/base/content/utilityOverlay.js#L818-L823 function getHelpLinkURL(aHelpTopic) { var url = Components.classes["@mozilla.org/toolkit/URLFormatterService;1"] .getService(Components.interfaces.nsIURLFormatter) .formatURLPref("app.support.baseURL"); return url + aHelpTopic; } The default value for app.support.baseURL is https://support.mozilla.org/1/firefox/%VERSION%/%OS%/%LOCALE%/ so the URL returned is https://support.mozilla.org/1/firefox/52.9.0/WINNT/en-US/keyboard-shortcuts which then auto-redirects to https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/keyboard-shortcuts-perform-firefox-tasks-quickly?redirectlocale=en-US&as=u&redirectslug=Keyboard+shortcuts&utm_source=inproduct ... As for the browser.slowstartup.help.url, I merely proposed what appeared to me as a simple (but functional) enough solution, provided @dencorso obliges ; but, since this is basically your PR and your call, you are free to proceed as you see fit... -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
... And why would you not link to this very MSFN thread? It would be consistent with what is already displayed in @roytam1's binary repository: https://o.rths.cf/palemoon/?sort=date&order=desc Index of /palemoon/ Welcome to New Moon (a.k.a. Pale Moon fork targetting XP) binary directory. These projects have no affiliation with any upstream community code sources or organizations. Please direct all support or related questions to disscussion thread in msfn.org. So, my recommendation would be: app.support.baseURL;https://msfn.org/board/topic/177125-my-build-of-new-moon-temp-name-aka-pale-moon-fork-targetting-xp/ WRT http://www.palemoon.org/support/slowstartup.shtml , this is just an adaptation from the corresponding Firefox guide: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-takes-long-time-start-up Admittedly, the PM page is better tailored to New Moon users, but, again, that page is copyrighted to MCP and has references to official app name, logo and support forum, so... Perhaps @dencorso can somehow transplant the following text: as second post to this very thread, then the URI to that post could be used as value of pref browser.slowstartup.help.url ( I am against this myself, but one can supposedly disable a "slow start-up" page from appearing by toggling pref: browser.slowStartup.notificationDisabled; this will disable the notification and the access to the support page ). -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Thanks. I'll make the necessary fix and create another pull request, probably tonight. ... Have you looked at my own post on this subject? -
Latest version 0.49b 1. Has rectified the oversized/elongated app window 2. App window can now be minimised to taskbar 3. App window can't be maximised or resized 4. There is no more a right "sidebar", but the test result is being displayed in the bottom "status bar" 5. As with previous versions, 200 sample hosts are being checked against... I ran the app on my Vista SP2 32-bit old laptop (so can't tell whether it runs under XP SP3 ), 0 detections and 7 handshake failures here...
-
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@Mathwiz: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/blob/master/application/palemoon/app/profile/palemoon.js https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/blob/master/application/palemoon/app/profile/palemoon.js#L82 https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/blob/master/application/palemoon/app/profile/palemoon.js#L927 We need the location of the code to be modified inside the Source Code, not inside the compiled application ... -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The "instagram" issue in UXP browsers (NM28, Serpent 52) has been covered in fine detail in previous pages of this thread, when it first manifested itself ; it's a case similar to player.pl, that is due to new UXP defaults (general.useragent.compatMode.version;60.9), instagram sends JS code the platform can't cope with... The solution is similar to the one suggested for player.pl, i.e. use a SSUAO for instagram that advertises a Firefox < 60.0 version; DON'T touch the "general.useragent.compatMode.version" pref, just create: general.useragent.override.instagram.com;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0 -
@Mathwiz For troubleshooting purposes, things are much easier when using portable packages/installations; for example, official PM28 (recently updated to v28.5.1) is being distributed also as a WinPenPack portable "setup" (in reality, an extractor): You can substitute the contents of the "Bin" directory (respecting folder tree) with latest NM28 binaries... The portable package comes by default with an empty profile (found inside the User directory); by running the portable launcher, you instantly get a pristine/default browser profile to test with! NB that this portable installation does not interact with your "installed" NM28 version, but they shouldn't be run concurrently while testing... When you want to start fresh with a new clean profile, just back-up/trash the previous one (while the browser is exited) and when you then re-launch Palemoon-Portable.exe, it's like the first time all over again
-
The same file mpengine.dll is used inside mpam-fe.exe (MSE manual definition updater) and mpas-fe.exe (manual definition updater for Vista+Win7's iteration of WinDefender); while MSE itself is NOT officially supported under Vista, Vista's native WD (for some undisclosed reason) IS, as one can see by visiting: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/definitions Microsoft Security Essentials 32-bit | 64-bit Windows Defender in Windows 7 and Windows Vista 32-bit | 64-bit So if M$ decide on breaking mpengine.dll on Vista (make it only Win7 compatible), they will intentionally quit supporting Vista's WD antimalware solution; but it's their prerogative, you know ; Vista has been EoS for more than two years, Vista users are currently at M$'s mercy (and if one of you "XP-ers" decides to visit MSFN's thread pertaining to installing Windows Server 2008 SP2 updates on Vista, one will clearly see that things have started falling apart recently... ).
-
Try to install it.xpi from: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.9.0esr/win32/xpi/ (not tested )
-
... Dumb question, but has it been verified via Dependency Walker that the new engine file still remains XP incompatible? Engine version 1.1.16000.6 (file mpengine.dll) works OK under Vista SP2, too...
-
... Would you really? First, you'd have to acknowledge that Serpent 52.9.0/UXP and Serpent 55.0.0/Moebius are two different applications on two different platforms (because I often sense a notion, shared by many here, that they are, in fact, quite similar ...); the former is under active development by the upstream devs, while the latter only receives the occasional "experimental" update by its current maintainer... MCP have changed pref general.useragent.compatMode.version in St52 to value 60.9; this means that the Firefox portion of St52's UAS claims rv:60.9, this alone satisfies GitHub's needs and "github.com" should work out-of-the-box; with recent builds of St52, one does not need a SSUAO for Github per se: (on Vista:) Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:60.9) Goanna/4.2 Basilisk/52.9.0 unless the global UAS has been modified to something claiming older Firefox versions... semi-OT: To ensure better compatibility with the largest number of sites, I have turned ON both Gecko and Firefox compat modes: general.useragent.compatMode.firefox;true general.useragent.compatMode.gecko;true so my global St52 UAS reads: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:60.9) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/4.2 Firefox/60.9 Basilisk/52.9.0 In the case of Serpent 55, the value of pref general.useragent.compatMode.version has remained at 55.0 (<60.0), additionally Gecko & Firefox compat modes are defaulted to true; this means github.com sees the client as Firefox 55: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:55.0) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/4.0 Firefox/55.0 Basilisk/55.0.0 , hence it gets broken and doesn't work out-of-the-box there... You have several options to restore GitHub on St55, the one I suggested was to use a SSUAO which doesn't contain any Firefox portions (github.com gets "confused" and serves moebius compatible code): Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:55.0) Goanna/4.0 Basilisk/55.0.0 ... or you could modify pref general.useragent.compatMode.version to 60.0; in that case, the global UAS will read: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/4.0 Firefox/60.0 Basilisk/55.0.0 and github will work (but "instagram", "player.pl" and possibly others will break...). To conclude on this, my tests have shown that you can use in St55 the same SSUAO that works in St52 (which, as explained, doesn't necessarily need one!) to restore GitHub functionality; e.g., I just used Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:60.9) Goanna/4.2 Basilisk/52.9.0 successfully in latest Serpent 55.0.0
-
Latest Serpent 55/Moebius works fine on GitHub here, if the following SSUAO is employed for domain "github.com": general.useragent.override.github.com;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:53.0) Goanna/4.0 Basilisk/55.0.0 Proof (new clean profile, no extensions): Forgiven ; but you did scare the cr*p out of me! I thought we were good at least until Quantum 60.x.x becomes EoS later in the year...
-
... What aspects of the GitHub site have now become broken for you? I had restored the SSUAO feature in FxESR 52.9.1 in the way I posted about previously (manual insertion of two local *.js files in the main app directory), my override pref for github is: general.useragent.override.github.com;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/60.0 and at the time of this post (June 3rd, 2019, ca, 22:50 UTC) I see no obvious breakage in github.com; but it might also be a CDN issue, i.e. the changes may have been first rolled-out in the Americas and have not yet reached the Europe github mirrors... Time will soon tell... ( On a related note, I see no github.com breakage in both UXP forks (NM28, St52) )
-
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
uB0-legacy has just been updated to version 1.16.4.11; those without uB0 updater installed, should download and install manually: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/releases/tag/firefox-legacy-1.16.4.11 Also, latest NM28-compatible language-packs have been (recently) updated to v28.6.0_RC2 : https://github.com/JustOff/pale-moon-localization/releases/tag/28.6.0_RC2 -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Have you, by any chance, tried GreaseMonkey for Pale Moon : https://github.com/janekptacijarabaci/greasemonkey/releases/latest (file greasemonkey-3.31.4-pm_forkBranch.xpi) ? Personally, in Serpent 52.9.0 I'm using latest ViolentMonkey (2.10.5) as userscript manager (of the WE type, still supported in St52 - but not official Basilisk/UXP). -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
It's controlled by pref app.support.baseURL default value is http://www.palemoon.org/support/ When you choose "Help", the browser tries to load http://www.palemoon.org/support/firefox-help which then auto-redirects to http://www.palemoon.org/faq.shtml -
My Browser Builds (Part 1)
VistaLover replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
+1 ; in fact, I am indifferent to the whole "rebranding" hullabaloo ; personally, I know very well where I first learned about the existence of the Pale Moon fork (yes, that's what it is), i.e. this very forum/thread, I know very well where the compiled builds are hosted and where to download them from, I am well aware of @roytam1's GitHub repositories and blog, so I'd have to be senile to direct myself to one of the upstream sites for official support (especially given the fact how rude/hostile people there are to "intruders" ); OTOH, taking into account how similar the code is between PM and the fork in question, I have every right - if I wish to do so - to visit the official Pale Moon forum as an unregistered user and seek help there by searching already posted content; and, provided I have access to working official binaries, I might post an issue in the official github tracker (given I already have a GitHub account) if a bug I discovered in NM is reproducible in official PM; I won't, of course, make any mention of the fork on a non-supported OS; NB that Moonchild doesn't like people "littering" his tracker before the reported "issue" has been first filtered in his forum, but that's his own problem... To conclude, that is how far I would approach the official support avenues... ... New-name giving and artwork? Fine, if you like to occupy yourself with what is devoid of real substance ; there, I said it... (DISCLAIMER: No offence meant to members about to - once again - inundate this thread with new candidate browser names )