Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Cixert
-
Updated browser list for Windows XP
Cixert replied to Cixert's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The last version Windows XP compatible from Liebao Browser aka Cheetah Secure Browser aka Cheetah Safe Browser aka Kingsoft Browser is the 6.5.115.19871 from November 2021. It is possible download here http://www.liebao.cn/6/index.html New version is not Windows XP compatible.- 81 replies
-
2
-
- Browsers 2022
- Browsers
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Thanks, but I have copies of the registry made with WinRescue2000. After defragmenting it seems strange to me that after restoring a previous version of the registry sometimes it starts and sometimes it doesn't
-
The hard drive is 500 GB Sata II with 4 primary partitions in Fat32, in the second partition Windows 2000 is installed. The SYSTEM size does not reach 6 MIB. I have executed Chkdsk / f / r and has no errors. I have executed the Victoria test and does not find defective sectors. S.M.A.R.T. It is not very healthy, but it does not say that the status is critical, I have Windows XP in the third partition running without problems. I have defragmented the Windows 2000 partition and now the system does not start though I restore any registry copy complete. This says that all SYSTEM copy is damaged. Edit: After executing Victoria I can restore copies System file and I return to the initial problem
-
Root Certificates and Revoked Certificates for Windows XP
Cixert replied to heinoganda's topic in Windows XP
Sorry for not reading all previous conversations. I have not understood in the first post if to update the certificates it is enough to download the application or if it is necessary to follow the additional steps. -
I would like to know what the 360 Extreme Explorer engine really is. In the interface it says Webkit. But the doubt enters when seeing that it runs Chromium 86. In my notes I had pointed out that this is webkit adapted to Chromium, but I have the doubt if 360 Extreme Explorer has a Blink engine. How is the case in other chromium browsers like DC Browser, Kafan MiniBrowser, Liebao Cheetah Secure Browser, Maxthon, QQ Browser, Sogou Explorer, UC Browser, TS Browser...? Do they have blink engine or webkit engine? I take advantage of the post to ask if it is possible that 360 Extreme Explorer does not change to the Trident engine, when it does not load a page the first time. I already have configured in settings to use only webkit, but sometimes it changes to the Internet Explorer engine.
-
I have 2 computers with the same problem, a desktop and a laptop. When starting Windows 2000 it says that the SYSTEM registry file is corrupted. I restore a previous registry backup made automatically with the WinRescue 2000 program and then Windows starts again. But when I restart the computer the problem returns. I think I don't have any rare software installed that I don't have on other computers. What can be?
-
Updated browser list for Windows XP
Cixert replied to Cixert's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
How odd, in spain is error 404- 81 replies
-
- Browsers 2022
- Browsers
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Updated browser list for Windows XP
Cixert replied to Cixert's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
It seems that UC Browser is discontinued. The latest version for Windows PC is 2018 and the latest Android version is 2021. The website does not work: https://www.ucweb.com- 81 replies
-
1
-
- Browsers 2022
- Browsers
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
The compilation is made 1 year ago. I had it saved, pending publication. I've tried a few links and found they work, sorry if some don't work anymore. I use Avast 6 with March 2020 definitions. I don't want to use more current versions, since they consume a lot of resources and try to protect me in matters that I don't need. I prefer to work without antivirus, my computer is much faster. Most of the programs that I need, I have downloaded them before 2020 or I do not need versions after 2020 generally. The antivirus only works for me to scan for viruses, not to run in the background. But above all what works is experience and thinking with your head. I am still alive since 2008 without any new virus in my system. I live hahaha without antivirus.
-
As I have not been able to get 360 Extreme Explorer version 13 to correctly recognize the certificates of the pages, I have continued working with version 11 for the last few years, until I verified that my browser is outdated. Then I have started to work with version 13.5.2022 displaying many pages with the red padlock and the message "the page is not secure" appearing, so I have to click on the option to access this site without a certificate. OK, now the problem is that I see that in version 13 many pages are not displayed correctly, while in version 11 they are correctly displayed (the style sheet does not load, the menus, images, etc. do not load) For example: https://sourceforge.net/
-
Official download definitions (no longer given for versions 5,6,7): http://www.avast.com/en-us/download-update https://www.avast.com/ivps5x/vpsupd.exe THIS WORKS IN 2022 for version 5,6,7: http://redir.iavs5x.u.avcdn.net/iavs5x/vpsupd.exe version 4 here: http://files.avast.com/iavs4pro/vpsupd4.exe Alternative servers: https://www.downloadsource.es/1005/avast-Virus-Definitions/ (official download) https://www.mediaket.net/en/software/updates/2211-avast-offline-update.html https://www.techspot.com/downloads/2108-avast-virus-definitions-update.html Definitions download from the program itself 5,6,7: k8814960.iavs5x.u.avast.com O well: g8263259.iavs5x.u.avast.com (185.43.182.106) Latest Avast 5,6,7 updated: http://redir.iavs5x.u.avcdn.net/iavs5x/setup_av_free.exe (download the latest version 5,6,7 updated) (the 7.0.1474.773) Unofficial download definitions all versions: https://www.techspot.com/downloads/2108-avast-virus-definitions-update.html Definitions download Unofficial latest update versions 5,6,7: https://www.techspot.com/downloads/downloadnow/2108/?evp=1502b5e49e92dceb4c15b688c47fc09b&file=3
-
Updated browser list for Windows XP
Cixert replied to Cixert's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Lobo Evolution 3.0, fork Lobo 0.98.4 java browser, is running on Windows XP but on my computer it run very slow. Release date 21 July 2022 is here https://github.com/LoboEvolution/LoboEvolution/releases- 81 replies
-
- Browsers 2022
- Browsers
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I have seen that the Lunascape downloader version tries to download a file called Webkit.exe and Gecko.exe to install these engines. This doesn't work anymore, the last Lunascape is from the year 2018. Looking for information I have found some instructions to run Apple Webkit on Windows. https://schepp.dev/posts/running-webkit-on-windows/ I try to follow the instructions, but I don't know which is the WebKit-Cairo folder and I can't find the MiniBrowser.exe file Has anyone tried it? I think it should run on Windows XP, Otter Browser and other webkit powered browsers work on Windows XP. Edit: From what I've been checking minibrowser.exe is inside the builds for Windows, but the links I find don't work. https://medium.com/@alSkachkov/how-to-load-the-latest-webkit-on-windows-962a9219c1e1
-
The disk is 4 KiB native. I am working without problems with MBR on Windows XP. I have found many peculiarities in tests with GPT disk that I will comment on in a short time in this other thread. For example, only two partition programs correctly read GPT disk on Windows XP and only one allows working with GPT partitions on Windows XP, Acronis Disk Director. But I now want to continue solving questions about MBR with 5 TB. 1-If I try to create 3 primary and 3 logical partitions with Mini Tool Partition Wizard in Windows 10 it doesn't work. I had no problems with just 3 primary partitions, one with 3TB. Edit: With other programs I have had no problems. If I align the partition with Mini Tool to the size in MB instead of the cylinder, will I have problems on Windows XP? 2-When I create partitions on Windows XP I don't have problems, but I am curious to know why all partition programs have a limit for the smaller size of the cluster with FAT32. For example, if I create a FAT32 partition with more than 600 GB, Mini Tool forces the minimum cluster size to be 16 KiB. Other programs have other different limits, I remember that Partition Magic forced a minimum cluster size of 32 KiB in +32 GB partitions. Is there a physical limit? I can easily format FAT 32 partitions with +1 TB and 4 KiB cluster size with Guiformat FAT32 Format. 3-I would like to know if there is any physical limit so that the most modern Logilink USB adapters do not work with +5TB disks (4 TB limit). And that these with the updated firmware have a limit smaller than 2.2 TB. I'm still looking for other USB adapters that work with +2.2TB drives. Please comment. I am also going to comment that I have bought another disk, this time 6 TB Toshiba P300, no computer is able to detect it, neither internal SATA nor external USB. I think the drive is faulty. I've already taken it to the store, all are problems. There is no real evolution, Mini Tool Partition Wizard 12.5 free has its latest version for Windows XP https://surgatekno.com/download/minitool-partition-wizard-free/ The evolution of the program has been to add Google Analytics to retail version, 12.6 no longer works with Windows XP. It is now spyware.
-
Yes, I know the methods and still experiment with them so that there are no errors with GPT disk on Windows XP. I confirm that Seagate Box does not mount the GPT disks on Windows XP or with Paragon GPT Loader or Windows 2003 drivers. I confirm that USB Logilink adapters work properly with GPT disk on Windows XP. Furthermore, I also confirm that USB Logilink AU0028A model does not work with MBR disks larger than 4 TB. In addition, this same model with the updated firmware has the MBR limit on 2 TB. This is possible a firmware downgrade. Oldest USB Logilink AU0028 (without letter "A") work without problems with MBR discs with 5 TB. I have five USB Logilink adapters, but only an old model that works without problems with MBR. Please, you comment SATA to USB adapters that work without problems with MBR disk on Windows XP or Windows 2000.
-
After formatting as MBR on Windows 10 I have removed the disc from the box. First, I have connected it through a Logilink USB adapter that I bought in 2017 and that was working with an MBR 4 TB drive. Then the MBR disk is recognized by all Windows with a false capacity of 561 GB. A moment when I remembered that I have an older Logilink USB adapter, with different hardware, but with the same external appearance. Then the disk has been read by Windows XP successfully. I have tried to format it as both MBR and GPT with various programs, and it works perfectly on XP. Paragon GPT with modifications has worked. Then I put the formatted GPT disk with 5 partitions back into its original box, then Windows XP again recognizes the disk but doesn't mount it. Partition Wizard now says that the drive only has a 2 TB partition, which is false, plus a small front partition. So far these are the conclusions: -Seagate box does not work on Windows XP neither as GPT nor as MBR. - Logilink USB adapters with newer firmware work up to 2TB on MBR, with older firmware up to 4TB on MBR and GPT. -Older Logilink adapters currently have no limit. It is necessary to make a list of USB adapters that work with large drives MBR in Windows XP. why is a Logilink model limited to 4TB? Why doesn't Segate box mount disk as GPT in Windows XP?
-
It does not mount. It seems clear that the Seagate box doesn't support LBA48, but I think if I remove the drive to work with an LBA48 compatible interface it might not work either. This happens: -I delete the partitions -I create a new partition with less than 2 TiB -I close Partition Wizard -I reopen Partition Wizard. So I see that there are 2 unformatted spaces: -1 MiB in front of the formatted partition. -Remainder of the size behind the formatted partition. Could this problem happen? https://msfn.org/board/topic/173265-formatting-an-external-drive-using-different-interfaces/ The difference is that it does not read the disk after formatting on the computer itself.
-
I have bought a new 5TB Seagate Basic external drive. https://www.seagate.com/products/external-hard-drives/basic-external-hard-drive/ I understand how to use +2TB drives on Windows 2000 & XP. https://msfn.org/board/topic/176480-2-tib-limit-size-in-mbr-hard-drives/ When I plug in the drive it is not recognized by Windows disk manager. So I have connected the drive on Windows 10 and converted the drive from GPT to MBR. The first thing that surprises me is that MiniTool Partition Wizard and EASEUS Partition Master won't let me partition larger than 2TB on MBR. So I make an NTFS partition less than 2TB, leave the rest of the drive unpartitioned, and plug the drive into Windows XP. But the drive letter is still not recognized on Windows XP. In file explorer the drive does not appear. It doesn't show up in disk management either (on windows 2000 it shows up but says unreadable). In device manager the drive is perfectly installed. On eject hardware the drive appears. If I try to assign a drive letter with Partition Wizard it doesn't work and also tells me that the size is only 2Tb, instead of 5TB. Is the Seagate box Windows XP or NT5 incompatible?
-
This has worked on Outlook Express. I have followed these instructions. This enables 2-Step Verification without the need for 2-Step Verification. This provides a new password for each device. https://old.reddit.com/r/GMail/comments/t6hhfj/you_may_lose_access_to_some_of_your_thirdparty/ 1) Log into gmail 2) Click the user icon in the top-right corner and select "Manage your Google Account" 3) Go to the security page (from the list at the left) 4) [This is necessary for the next step, but will stop your scripts from logging into smtp with your regular password. This is sort of the point of no return. Make sure you are ready to go all the way and update all of your email-sending scripts before continuing.] Enable two-step authentication. 5) Once two-step authentication is enabled, go back to the security page. There should now be a new section called "App Passwords". Select it. You will probably be asked to log in again. 6) Generate a new app password. I put in "Mail" under "select app" and "Other" under "select device," but I don't think any of the information you put it matters. 7) It will give you a 16-character app password which will be shown in yellow. 8) Have your scripts use this password to log into smtp instead of your regular password and everything should work. It will not prompt you for 2-step verification. Details: After enabling two-step verification, an error message appears in Outlook Express when trying to access Gmail. After copying and pasting into tools+accounts, the new 16-digit password for my computer, provided by the Google website, didn't work for some reason. This worked when I pasted the password when Outlook Express gives an error when trying to access the Google server to try to receive mail in Outlook Express. Important: You do not close the tab with the new Google password until you try to receive and also send Gmail mail. It asks for the new password twice, both when receiving mail and when sending it. I had previously enabled temporary permission to https://g.co/allowaccess But I don't know if that's essential.
-
is there a 2-step verification option? I try to enable access to unsecured applications https://www.google.com/settings/security/lesssecureapps and this message appears. It has been disabled since May 30, 2022. https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/6010255?hl=en However, temporary app access still works https://g.co/allowaccess But this does not give way to Outlook Express. Has anyone found the solution?
-
Perfect explanation, thank you very much. about MyPal68 I have seen this here https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/releases/tag/68.12.2b Enabled webtrc - please check, the discussion is here #24. FFmpeg hardware acceleration - its own technique not related to the browser. media.ffmpeg.hwacc_type 0 - none 2 - cuda 4 - dxva2
-
Yes, but I think it works on Windows XP and even on Windows 2000, how can it be verified? What about you shouldn't defragment SSD drives because they get damaged?
-
I have a doubt: Firefox from version 53 implements H.264 in the API? I have made several tests and I see that Serpent, New Moon, K-Meleon and Mypal 68 support native H.264. How do they do that? and Chrome? I have also seen that New Moon has differentiates from the previous ones, New Moon does not install OpenH264 by Cisco, for webRTC compatibility with calls H.264, if it is not created medium.gmp-provider.Enable with the TRUE value.