Jump to content

reboot12

Member
  • Posts

    463
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Poland

Everything posted by reboot12

  1. @nicolaasjan But binary from dropbox not work.
  2. @Dietmar What devices do you have on Other devices - give hardware id's then I make dummy drivers :-)
  3. @Dixel What DEV ID ? My is 0412 and driver works in WinXP 64-bit:
  4. Yes, of course, my second link in the signature.
  5. @saphta You were looking for something poorly because it was here on the forum: https://msfn.org/board/topic/176355-intel-haswell-hd-4600-xp-drivers-here/?do=findComment&comment=1227311
  6. @Dietmar Can you try to patch x64 the driver for the Intel I219-LM 8086 15BB ?
  7. @Dietmar Excellent Try also my WinXP 64-bit
  8. @Dietmar BIOS AMI ?
  9. @Jakob99 There are drivers ported for the I2C touchpad: Ported drivers for XP x86/x64 They are old in the link. Ask @George King about new ones - I have DP_Ported_DriversCollection_v44.7z from him but not tested I2C:
  10. Try this: https://forums.mydigitallife.net/threads/winxp-64-bit-on-a-modern-pc-iso-boot-wim-install-wim.88435
  11. Yea, I know - also for Intel Gen 8: https://www.betaarchive.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=477539#p477539 Intel Gen 9:
  12. Yea, what does this have to do with this topic and modified acpi.sys ???
  13. But I test same USB 3 16GB on ThinkPad X61 (original acpi.sys WinXP SP2 64-bit) and clone and copy block speed is same ~11 min Only on Intel Gen 8 Copy Block is faster than Clone
  14. Does this mean that Copy Block speed from USB depends on the modified acpi.sys ???
  15. I do not use such large pendrive as yours - the latest I have is Kingston DataTraveler USB 3.0 16GB I connected it to the USB 3 port and did the test: Clone Disk ~10 min clone_16GB.img Copy Block ~3 min - incredible (no display copy speed) copy_16GB.img Both files exactly same checksum: How is this possible? Clone USB > NVMe but Copy Block from RAM to NVMe ???
  16. OK, I'm back. The time of creating an image on the NVMe disk by cloning or copying the block is identical and the same as on the ThinkPad for SATA HDD disk - 1.5 min ??? This means that the acpi.sys or USB drivers and even the destination disk type (HDD, NVMe) does not matter and it depends only from the controller chip in-build in USB stick. I use WinHex 15.8 @Dietmar Try test with older smaller USB stick like me 1GB
  17. Hymmmm... I did the test on ThinkPad X61 with SATA HDD disk in WinXP SP2 64-bit with the original acpi.sys and USB EHCI driver. Now I'm going to my Intel Gen 8 WinXP SP2 64-bit machine with NVMe disk and modded driver NVMe 6.1.7601.23403, with modified acpi.sys 7777.8 and modded USB XHCI 6.2.9200.22099 driver I will report after tests.
  18. Which version WinHex you use? How you open USB stick and how do you mark the block? OK, I make tests with 1GB USB 2.0 stick on USB 2.0 port - 2 way to make image file - I always use Tools > Open Disk... > Physical Media > USB stick: Tools > Disk Tools > Clone Disk... > Destination raw clone.img - creation time 1.5 min Ctrl+A to select all data, Edit > Copy Block > Into New File block.img - creation time 1.5 min Both files have exactly the same size and checksum: Maybe your USB stick is damaged ?
  19. Still I don't understand! What block? Show on the screenshot how you do it in WinHex.
  20. @Dietmar I don't understand what it means to copy the block mode? How do you do it in WinHex ? (give screenshots). My way is to make an image using the sector-by-sector copy like the DD command in Linux.
  21. @Dietmar Provide data: computer hardware specifications what operating system what version of acpi.sys what version of USB3 drivers In WinHex do this: menu Tools > Disk Tools > Clone Disk... > click HDD icon in Source > Physical Media > USB stick click file icon in Destination then name copy.img on WD2003FZEX from menu Tools > Disk Tools > Open Disk... > Physical Media > USB stick from menu Tools > File Tools > Compare... compare file copy.img and opened USB stick
  22. reboot.pro not work:
  23. @LoneCrusader I do not see the sense of installing these Intel drivers (not drivers) because it does not improve the operation of the device. Intel chipset drivers does not add any new .sys or .dll files only use WinXP e.g. machine.inf and system drivers (files) - only changes the name of the device in the device manager e.g. PCI-to-PCI bridge to Intel 6 Series PCI Express Root bla bla bla and this device PCI bridge will not start working better after installing Intel drivers. I am glad that there are ported ACPI, AHCI, NVMe and USB 3.x drivers for WinXP - no matter if they are signed or not - it is important that they works.
  24. @LoneCrusader Signed, not sighed - what's the difference? As you noticed, Intel drivers are not-drivers - just a change device names in the device manager. I use WinXP 64-bit on Intel Gen 8 and I made dummy drivers to eliminate yellow exclamation marks of several devices in device manager: Now I don't have any unknown devices in the device manager
×
×
  • Create New...