Now, what do you think your customers do? They won't know to go in and configure their service back. More likely than not, they will either call you and complain since it was you/your shop who "fixed" their computer. Since it would be your shop causing the problem, do you think they'd return to your shop in the future if you broke their computer by tweaking it? No, they won't be back; and believe me, they'll tell their friends too. As much as you may think you're helping them, you're actually hindering them and their computer experience. While they may think it's a problem with the OS, it was actually the one who disabled the services which should be left alone. None of this is flaming dude, it's common sense and the truth. It's only the truth from the standpoint of a MS fanboy. All that stuff you're spouting is rubbish. Common sense says that more services uses more resources. Anything other than that is either a lie or plain foolish. Hindering their computer experience is accomplished by allowing you or MS to decide which needless services run continually in the background. The operating system is not the reason for the computer but a tool to host the real reason for the computer. The supported software and/or hardware. Clipbook > A security risk to have your clipboard shown to whomever. Computer Browser > totally unnecessary even in a network Distributed Link Tracking Service > Without a domain it's useless. Error Reporting Service > Great if you want YOUR computer reporting everything to MS Indexing Service > A resource hog that does nothing to speed access to anything Internet Connection Firewall > A worthless POS. Zonealarm Free is 10x better. Messenger Service > Go ahead and tell everyone that this one is good?? Net Logon > Most average users do not need this service. NT LM Security Support > Using telnet great, otherwise a waste. Performance Logs / Alerts > What average user even knows what this does, or cares. QOS RSVP > Average users don't use QOS but Windows Mgmt starts it anyway. Turn it off. Remote Access etc, etc > Again the average user won't use this. If you want to, your problem. Server Service > If you don't have a network, File and Print sharing over TCP is a really bad idea. UPNP > Security risk on any computer. SSDP > Only needed for UPNP. TCP/IP Netbios Helper > Netbios over TCP has always been a risk. Everybody except MS says so. Telnet > 90% of MS users don't have a clue what it is or how to use it. Uninteruptable Power Supply > If you don't have one it's useless. Upload Manager > No network, not necessary. Windows Time > Get a F**king watch. Turn this off. Maybe you should stop telling people to do something just because MS said so. Your computer security or "computing experience" is not high on their list. Their profit, IP and desire to control everything you do online is their agenda. I hope this doesn't jeopardize your quarterly MS stock divident.