Jump to content

jumper

Member
  • Posts

    2,006
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    United States

Everything posted by jumper

  1. > Could you provide a link to UMPlayer 0.95? I can only find 0.98 portable for Windows. 0.95 was current at the time; 0.98 should be fine. > This is a bit off topic, but how did you manage to get Slimboat Portable working on 9x? Huh? Slimboat is covered elsewhere. Ask with more details in the "Backporting" or "Really" thread if Google site:msfn.org doesn't answer it.
  2. > I am running Windows ME in WMware because I don't have access to my computer. VkrnlEx.vxd modifies memory but hasn't changed, so I don't see how WMware could be affected. >> Kexbases 4.5.2016.20 delta.7z > Can you try a different file host? The download link here is broken! Link works if logged in. > Any help? KernelEx 4.5.2 or later FULL package must be installed first. Then update with files from 4.5.2016.18 through .20 in DOS and reboot. Verify.exe needs KernelEx to be enabled on it with any mode other than the new "Minimal".
  3. Kexbases.map is just a text file the linker outputs that can be used for debugging. It has no effect on the execution and isn't even required. The new Core.ini sets the default mode to Base. If you previously had it set to something higher, that might explain why the ReactOS (or other) files seem faster.
  4. If SpeedDial is implemented as a local page, we should be able to modify its style sheet. In Opera 10.63, gstreamer required KernelEx when the rest of the browser didn't. In 12.18 it might also need more help from KernelEx than the rest of the browser. I'll take a look. It might also be possible to downgrade gstreamer to 11.x or 10.63 for smoother playback.
  5. No speed-ups intended--same code and build options. Just some new Version data and functions that can be accessed via new Core.ini modes. Perhaps SM is now running in a different mode?
  6. [at library attaching file] Kexbases 4.5.2016.20 delta.7z
  7. > I tried the newest KernelEx version. In what OS with what service packs? > K-Meleon appears more stable What version of KM? > my WinME installation in my VMWare Are you running ME in VMWare on SE?
  8. Maybe later this week. Will be testing on SE+IE5.
  9. Are KB971512 and KB2117917 two of those four, or in addition to the four?
  10. > The *\mfc*u*.dll in KEX registry stopped working for me with K19. I use the full paths now. I have no idea why. Please provide details on how you came to this conclusion. I have already added support for eight new OS versions to Kexbases.dll: + Windows Vista sp2 (6,0,0x1772) + Windows 7 sp1 (6,1,0x1DB1) + Windows 8 (6,2,0x23F0) + Windows 8.1 (6,3,0x2580) + Windows 10 (10,0,0x3AD7) + Windows 10 (10,0,0x42EE) + Windows 98 (fe) (4,10,0x040A07CE) + Windows XP sp3 (5,1,0x0A28) They are added after the existing functions for compatibility with existing CORE.ini modes. Please request now any other Windows versions you would like added.
  11. KernelEx 4.5.2016.19 delta.7z - 191KB
  12. KernelEx core update 4.5.2016.18 (beta) Core.ini update
  13. I upgraded to 4.3.2.7 (sponsored mode) instead. Hope to resume programming soon.
  14. But does the use of Uxtheme actually allow any theming? If not, the best choice is my 95-API version (including OpenThemeDataEx @61) at KernelEx Auxiliary DLL Updates I have given up on using any ROS files as complete replacements. I do test individual APIs via Kexstubs. Now I mainly use ReactOS source code directly in KernelEx.
  15. Perhaps the "XP computers and laptops everywhere" belong to the patients in the Gaming Addiction Ward?
  16. You don't know how to swim yet, so please stay away from the deep end of the pool! Install the 8.0a SDK and build some of the samples. Once you realize how much programming is involved in writing a game from scratch, choose a game engine. (If you want more than 5-10 FPS with fancy shading, you will be limited to 640x480 [or less]. What you really need is a DX9 card in a Win98+ system for your DX9 game.)
  17. The use of a manifest defeats the purpose of the test, so don't bother. More later....
  18. Knowing some of the hex values allowed me to search the internet for more. Please confirm as many as you can and any more you find: . WIN95....0xC0000004 4,0,40003B6,1,,0,0,0,0,0 . WIN95A...0xC0000004 4,0,40003B6,1, A ,0,0,0,0,0 . WIN95B...0xC0000004 4,0,4000457,1, B ,0,0,0,0,0 . WIN95B1..0xC0000004 4,3,40004BC,1, B ,0,0,0,0,0 . WIN95C...0xC0000004 4,3,40004BE,1, C ,0,0,0,0,0 . WIN98....0xC0000A04 4,A,40A07CE,1, ,0,0,0,0,0 + WIN98SE..0xC0000A04 4,A,40A08AE,1, A ,0,0,0,0,0 + WINME....0xC0005A04 4,5A,45A0BB8,1, ,0,0,0,0,0 . . . . . . . NT40.....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,,0,0,0,1,0 . NT40A....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,0,1,0 . NT40B....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,0,1,0 . NT40C....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 3,3,0,0,1,0 . NT40D....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 4,4,0,0,1,0 . NT40E....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 5,5,0,0,1,0 . NT40F....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 6,6,0,0,1,0 . NT40G....0x05650004 4,0,565,2,Service Pack 6a,6,0,0,1,0 . . . . . . . WIN2000..0x08930005 5,0,893,2,,0,0,0,1,1E . WIN2000A.0x08930005 5,0,893,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,0,1,1E . WIN2000B.0x08930005 5,0,893,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,0,1,1E . WIN2000C.0x08930005 5,0,893,2,Service Pack 3,3,0,0,1,1E . WIN2000D.0x08930005 5,0,893,2,Service Pack 4,4,0,0,1,1E . . . . . . . WINXP....0x0A280105 5,1,A28,2,,,0,100,1,0 . WINXP1...0x0A280105 5,1,A28,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,100,1,0 . WINXP2...0x0A280105 5,1,A28,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,100,1,0 + WINXP3...0x0A280105 5,1,A28,2,Service Pack 3,3,0,100,1,0 . WINXP64..0x0ECE0205 5,2,ECE,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,100,1,0 . WIN2003..0x0ECE0205 5,2,ECE,2,,0,0,100,3,0 . WIN2003A.0x0ECE0205 5,2,ECE,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,100,3,0 . WIN2003B.0x0ECE0205 5,2,ECE,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,100,3,0 . . . . . . . VISTA....0x17700006 6,0,1770,2,,0,0,100,1,0 . WIN2008..0x17700006 6,0,1770,2,,0,0,100,3,0 . VISTA1...0x17710006 6,0,1771,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,100,1,0 . WIN2008A.0x17710006 6,0,1771,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,100,3,0 . VISTA2...0x17720006 6,0,1772,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,100,1,0 . WIN2008B.0x17720006 6,0,1772,2,Service Pack 2,2,0,100,3,0 . . . . . . . WIN7.....0x1db00106 6,1,1db0,2,,0,0,100,1,0 . W2008R2A.0x1db00106 6,1,1db0,2,,0,0,100,3,0 . WIN7A....0x1db10106 6,1,1db1,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,100,1,0 . W2008R2B.0x1db10106 6,1,1db1,2,Service Pack 1,1,0,100,3,0 . . . . . . + WIN8.....0x23F00206 6,2,23F0,2,,0,0,100,1,0 . WIN81....0x25800306 6,3,2580,2,,0,0,100,1,0 . WIN10....0x3AD7000A A,0,3AD7,2,,0,0,100,1,0 . WIN10A...0x42EE000A A,0,42EE,2,,0,0,100,1,0 ^--- confirmed (+)?
  19. > can it just be done with two computers and some phone cord? That's a different (but related) topic. Short answer: Use three of the wires as a cross-over cable between serial ports (not modems) and do DCC (Direct Cable Connect) networking. For long answer, see discussion in threads linked by @jaclaz. A dial-up server requires POTS service.
  20. > the lite version of Eudora Yes, Eudora 3.0 Light is what I resurrected from a 2001 backup of my '90s software. I've just downloaded 4.3.2 and 5.2.1 and will give them a try. > my full Eudora Unfortunately, still way too "full" for me. What version is it?
  21. Startup->Help->Dial-Up Server
  22. > directx 8.0b wasn't ever a full update There is no 8.0b. Perhaps you're thinking of the 8.1b update. 8.0a is the last for Win95 (but it might be possible to mod 8.1 into working). First you need choose your DirectX Game Engine for Win95. The requirements will probably be the following: * Install MSVC 6 (VS98) (or maybe MSVC5/VS97 or MSVB6) * Install the Win95 Platform SDK (if not included with VS) * Install the DirectX 8.0a SDK * Install the Game Engine SDK (Or modify DX8 samples) VSE2003 might work for development (depending upon platform), but the runtimes might not (on W95; if not, static link instead). Avoid .NET unless the Game Engine uses it. Win95 DDK is not needed.
  23. Microsoft has shut down the Search Assistant. "ie.search.msn.com" now redirects to "bing.com" which doesn't support "srchasst\srchasst.htm" (or "srchcust.htm"). Scan your registry for the string "ie.search.msn.com" or "srchasst" and replace that URL with a new one of your choice such as "http://ie.search.yahoo.com/{sub_rfc1766}/srchasst/srchasst.htm". See: &tab; answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006043010329 (Alternately, you can install some mid-2000's malware and let it hijack the search assistant for you!)
  24. So as of 8.1, GetVersion, GetVersionEx, and VerifyVersionInfo are deprecated in favor of the new Version Helper APIs: So Windows is now doing with a manifest just what KernelEx does with compatibility modes. Okay, got it! Can you run the test again with just the Win8.1 manifest entry? Also Win7? That would complete our post-XP version gathering. Support for manifests and the Version Helper APIs will be added to KernelEx todo list.
  25. So Win10 1809/17763.316 and 1803/17143.590 are both reporting the same (incorrect) build number: 23F0 hex = 9200 dec In comparison: WinXP SP3 build 2600.xpsp_sp3_qfe.180912-0606 (with POSReady patch) reports: A28 hex = 2600 dec What is MS thinking! Are 17143 and 17763 updates to an earlier 9200 install?
×
×
  • Create New...