AstroSkipper
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by AstroSkipper
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
When uploading a favicon filled with zeros, then an empty image is the inevitable consequence. TBH, I would have preferred a real favicon too, but a less dirty console is even better. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 Thanks for uploading a dummy favicon.ico file to your server o.rthost.win! -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Today, I have updated to New Moon 28 (20260418) and I can also confirm that GitHub websites are running much better than in older releases. As mentioned in previous posts, I will avoid using the release 20260425. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
@roytam1 For ages one permanently gets error messages regarding the absence of the favicon.ico file in the root directory of your server o.rthost.win when visiting. Would it be possible for you to put one there? That would make my browser console look a lot less red. And if you can fix it that easily, it should be done in seconds. I would be delighted in any case. Of course, it's up to you. Just a polite request. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Many thanks for this ; it worked as described; still, this is a mitigation/a workaround, whereas the underlying UXP cause that now triggers the "incompatible" message remains unknown ... That's why I reported it to the Palefill issues. I see no reason for one to swear , is there? https://www.google.com/search?channel=entpr&q=TTBOMK That’s not swearing. It’s just a typical German habit to get annoyed by such abbreviations. Native English speakers use an abbreviation for every little thing, which is completely frowned upon here. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I meant the personal notifications. And what the hell is TTBOMK ... DKKWV (Das kann keiner wirklich verstehen) -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Read my report here and you will fix it easily: https://github.com/martok/palefill/issues/109 -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I have all three browsers installed under Windows XP, New Moon 28, Serpent 52 and Mypal 78. At the moment, Serpent 52 is the only one who works without any serious problems on GitHub. Logging in, personal messages, downloading files, searching and reading contents or issues, and even commenting is working on my old single-core Pentium 4. New Moon 28 has always had issues with GitHub, and they’re getting worse and worse. GitHub’s web technology is rubbish. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
New Moon 28 and even Mypal 78 don't work properly on Github. That's why I use Serpent 52 for accessing GitHub pages under Windows XP. @basilisk-dev and @roytam1 did a good job. -
Don't use the LUA script if you don't know how it works and which configurations have to be done! First read, then act!
- 192 replies
-
1
-
- ytBATCH
- youtube.lua
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Maybe for you but my package needs a correct configuration of Min2Tray for minimizing the proxy console. There’s no need to reinvent the wheel. My package works perfectly as it was described in my thread and inside the archive. Any modifications done by users at their own risk!- 928 replies
-
1
-
- Certificates
- ProxyMII
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
Hello @sea! Thanks for posting and interest in ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V3! However, it is more or less portable. It only uses modules from inside its programme folder and stores its settings there. The "Configure PopMenu.exe" is necessary to adapt all absolute pathes, to configure Min2Tray and to set the autostart of PopMenu and Min2Tray. You can of course use relative pathes but Min2Tray has then to be manually configured as well. It needs own registry entries and is therefore not really fully portable. I personally use ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu TLS 1.3 3V4 which I had updated to the most recent ProxyMI-20230813 long time ago but never released here due to the lack of interest. Strictly following the rule: No demand, no supply.- 928 replies
-
1
-
- Certificates
- ProxyMII
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I understand that, but there are many important things on GitHub. So, unfortunately, it is important to fix it in Mypal 78. BTW, thanks for fixing Internationalization & Localization after all these years. Is it finished? If so, you can close the corresponding issue #96.
-
@feodor2 I am in the process of thoroughly testing Mypal 78.0.2. Do you have any idea why GitHub is no longer running smoothly? I can't see any error messages in the browser console but I get the following in the web console: Content Security Policy: The page’s settings blocked the loading of a resource at inline (“script-src”). 2 content.js:71:182 Uncaught DOMException: An invalid or illegal string was specified react-core-1b7e0e8bea30ae82.js:2 connectedCallback ReactBaseElement.tsx:120 connectedCallback ReactAppElement.tsx:63 connectedCallback core.js:45 connectedCallback core.js:13 O register.js:12 O core.js:34 T controller.js:5 o tslib.es6.mjs:58 227527 react-core-1b7e0e8bea30ae82.js:3 b wp-runtime-20909bf7227a153b.js:2 122684 code-view-d1ce18268b0bf560.js:2 b wp-runtime-20909bf7227a153b.js:2 <anonymous> code-view-d1ce18268b0bf560.js:2 O on_chunk_loaded:27 <anonymous> code-view-d1ce18268b0bf560.js:2 a jsonp_chunk_loading:71 a self-hosted:1402 <anonymous> code-view-d1ce18268b0bf560.js:2 The latter I even got five times on your GitHub site.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Why do you say that ??? @NotHereToPlayGames Good question! And I’ll go one step further. It’s always the same people who don’t really have anything meaningful to contribute, but when it comes to hurling insults, they’re always first in line. -
Yes, do you remember we discussed this Of course, I remember our conversation.
-
Thanks for the information! I need such facts for programming UC.JS scripts and creating CSS stylesheets. So, Mypal 74.1.4 has a JS level of 102 and Mypal 78.0.2 a JS level of 105. Correct? But what are their CSS levels? And you raised the Mypal version number to 78 solely for compatibility reasons regarding the Custom Buttons extension?
-
@feodor2 What Firefox level are the CSS and JavaScript in Mypal 74.1.4? In the GitHub releases, I read something about FF102 regarding JavaScript, but nothing about CSS.
-
I think inserting the brackets is logical and correct.
- 192 replies
-
2
-
- ytBATCH
- youtube.lua
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Here are some facts about the sizes of SUPERAntiSpyware's virus definition files from 2024 to 2026: SASDEFINITIONS.EXE 210,345,304 bytes 07.07.2024 SASDEFINITIONS.EXE 214,737,232 bytes 27.05.2025 SASDEFINITIONS.EXE 353,800,400 bytes 23.01.2026 The virus definition file SASDEFINITIONS.EXE has increased by 4,391,928 bytes from July 2024 to May 2025, which is a normal increase of approx. 2% within 10 months. From May 2025 to January 2026, however, it increased by 139,063,168 bytes. This is an unbelievable increase of approx. 65% within only 8 months and definitely a no-go. The file has become totally bloated for whatever reason. Now, I finally know why the download takes much longer time than before, apart from the catastrophic download speed on their update server, which is used by the programme.
- 1,615 replies
-
2
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don't know about American phone numbers but you should know that. The number is (801) 523-6766.
- 1,615 replies
-
2
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
And after all these facts, here is my theory about what could be behind this destruction of 32-bit installations. Users are offered a programme update for SUPERAntiSpyware, and then, after the damage has been done, they are ripped off with great telephone support (because all is great there ) and whatever else. This is what my cat has to say about it:
- 1,615 replies
-
2
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
And if anyone thinks that there is hardly anything worse to report about SUPERAntiSpyware, I have to disappoint them. We now come to the "official support" for SUPERAntiSpyware, which has since been taken over by the American company USTechSupport. If you want to fill out the online form on the SUPERAntiSpyware homepage, you are required to provide a telephone number. Rejected! An email to support is answered immediately, but of course by a bot. You can write whatever you want, but you won't get any help. Just a recommendation that it's best to use the telephone support. And for this information, the support ticket is then marked as resolved. I've never seen such rubbish. The hotline is probably chargeable. It all smells like a rip-off. That wasn't the case when I contacted SUPERAntiSpyware support the last time years ago before it was acquired by RealDefense LLC in 2023 which is also an American company. But when it comes to America, nothing surprises me anymore.
- 1,615 replies
-
4
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I also tested again the real-time protection module of SUPERAntiSpyware. The CPU usage on my old computer is high and completely unacceptable. Therefore, a Professional licence is not worthwhile at all on low-performance computers.
- 1,615 replies
-
3
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Athough I have disabled the checking for programme updates in SUPERAntiSpyware's settings, every time I start it up or update the definitions, I am annoyed by the usual pop-up promising a programme update. Therefore, I would like to warn you against updating the programme via Automatic Updates at this point. Stay at the version 10.0.0.1254 or uninstall it!
- 1,615 replies
-
2
-
- Security
- Antimalware
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: