Leaderboard

If you had any experience with enterprise level infosec, my statement would make perfect sense. To note that I (personally) have an understanding of the execution chain in theory but this is not confirmed. It would be foolish for me to provide that information as if it were valid, and an exploit exists, it could allow malign actors to take action against the site. If you had any experience in running a website, you would know that you never make public anything that could potentially allow someone to exploit the site. The site is sometimes redirecting to a new url now, a 98m4. User Agent may play a role, but changing the user agent in Palemoon (where I am typing from) to the one that Iron uses (where the redirect happens) doesn't cause the redirect to occur in Palemoon. I suspect that I know the reason for that, however since that information could be linked to an exploit, that won't be shared.

not much you can do as they control what to block or not. you may try disabling security.csp.enable in about:config, and you may even need an user agent spoofing.

Again, I revert to this, You and I will *NEVER* know.

@ED_Sln Please, as I don't have a GitHub account, can you ask to the developper to remove the code that delete all extensions when you move the portable versions of Chromium and Ungoogled Chromium from one computer to another. It's a horrible feature added by Google... I'm not sure about that but it seems that even some settings are restored by default with the move. Tested with Chromium 146.0.7656.0 and Ungoogled Chromium 144.0.7559.59. Regards

Try the PortableApps Portable Legacy 52 and see if it launches. It will not affect other Firefox installs/profiles. https://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox-portable-legacy-52

@win32 , 373.19 is a very special case , indeed : 100% official Vista support . It still has the Vista block and it doesn't call for memcpy_s in ntoskrnl ! By the way, it is actually newer than 375 , I think . Why I think so ? Some file versions are similar and it has the telemetry . And as far as I remember, the 375 (official nvidia driver) was the first to incude it ! Pascal , no , I do not have any Pascal , also I sold my Maxwell recently . But Dereck Draker (also a Fujitsu Siemens owner) says it works with GTX980 and it is very fast. As for me , I tested it with the Fujitsu Siemens laptop (obviously), the card is the first version of GT820M , also I can confirm it works on GTX Titan (the first titan) , GTX780 , GTX780ti [the first version]. My neighbour says it works with DX9/DX10 games with his 1070 , but I can't confirm . I mean , there is no reason for him to lie to me, but I just can't go inside his house and test myself. Yet again , I can give it to you , no prob. . But only to you , since you also own a Fujitsu Siemens. EDIT : Forgot to say , there were a bit older drivers (several actually) like 372.93 , 373.06 supplied to us , and they all work with Vista . And you know 372.70 was the last one.

Still work for me ! Archived drivers from the official Intel page. http://web.archive.org/web/20171008142049/https://downloadmirror.intel.com/20758/a08/GFX_Win7_32_8.15.10.2761.exe http://web.archive.org/web/20171008142245/https://downloadmirror.intel.com/20758/a08/GFX_Win7_64_8.15.10.2761.exe The forum rules say I must include the source page too : http://web.archive.org/web/20171008141948/https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/20758/Graphics-Intel-HD-Graphics-Driver-for-Windows-Vista

I think you won't be impressed . Even though they were quite expensive , they aren't for hard core gamers . I prefer German quality , so I always buy Fujitsu Siemens (yes, they were still made in Germany up until 2018, don't know about now). If you want the models , some of them are D3012-a1 GS3 with 16GB DDR3 , D2912-A1 GS2 16GB and I game on a haswell board Siemens Fujitsu D3221-A12 GS2 W26361-W3321-Z3-04-36 , LGA 1150 , DDR3 32GB , it supports SLI . I love their design and quality . none of the Fujitsu Siemens goods have failed me yet. (for decades). Also , got several 24 inch Fujitsu Siemens premium monitors 16:10.

I have a unique driver version 373.19 x64 and x86 too (released on 1st of January 2017) , it was available only for those who paid for extended support . Only for Fujitsu Siemens notebooks' owners (some models) . So , as you may guess , I'm the owner of this marvel ! This driver works on laptops and desktops too . I'm guessing it could help you , no ? I mean , you could compare the dlls , right ? It has outstanding FPS in Vista . This driver includes the telemetry , but partially removed . I would gladly give these drivers to all of the members here , but their EULA forbids me to do so , sorry folks !!! But we know win32 has a Fujitsu-Siemens laptop , so no problem giving it to him ! Why silent about it ? I dunno , perhaps bacause he just stopped writing to me ... all of a sudden.

The solution could be to use these flags : --process-per-site (force to run all facebook or any other site's tabs in one process , even if you have a gazilion of them opened) Also , some of the flags to reduce chrome's RAM and power consumption , esp. for notebooks. Here is a good compilation : --enable-low-end-device-mode --disable-highres-timer --disable-low-res-tiling --wm-window-animations-disabled --enable-rgba-4444-textures --disable-login-animations P.S. These are only to speed up the browser , the above flags do not have anything to do with privacy/security. These also reduce CPU usage , esp. at the start : --disable-background-networking --disable-preconnect

C' mon , I was not laughing at you ! No jokes , you can test different 360 versions (including mine) and see the results for yourself. Who's version is the most advanced/protected ? Would be interesting if you make some screencaps ! Do not use your IP [not a joke]. In the end , we are trying to make a privacy oriented browser , aren't we ? https://browserleaks.com/webrtc https://browserleaks.com/webgl https://coveryourtracks.eff.org P.S. I have never ever told you I'm on twitter , etc. If you see any accounts pretending to be me (it's not me).

* these (plural) , otherwise like and totally agree .

And you need to understand , 360 browser is so rare , so if someone's using it with a Dutch or say UK/US IP , they're screwed . It means you're unique and you're logged and stored . In case someone's interested , just a small insight on how it happens . Cloudfare doesn't give a damn , they just tell it right in the open how they fingerprint and MITM us ! Of course they tell only about 5-7 % ... "When given a pair of User Agent and observed TLS Client Hello, MITMEngine detects differences between the given Client Hello and the one expected for the presented User Agent. For example, consider the following ..." https://blog.cloudflare.com/monsters-in-the-middleboxes/

It won't help in the case of youtube ang google , because they already took your fingerprint and it is stored in their database forever. So you now have your own unique customer ID . I'm sure you could do your own research about fingerprinting. [if it wasn't not too "etreme for your blood" , lol ].