Leaderboard

aaah, no clue whats wrong here: 0:26.17 c:/devel/myUXP/intl/icu/source/i18n/messageformat2_function_registry.cpp(862): error C2280: 'icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Plural::Plural(const icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Plural &)': attempting to reference a deleted function 0:26.17 c:\devel\myuxp\intl\icu\source\i18n\messageformat2_function_registry_internal.h(248): note: compiler has generated 'icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Plural::Plural' here 0:26.17 c:\devel\myuxp\intl\icu\source\i18n\messageformat2_function_registry_internal.h(248): note: 'icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Plural::Plural(const icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Plural &)': function was implicitly deleted because a data member invokes a deleted or inaccessible function 'icu_78::LocalPointer<icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Number>::LocalPointer(const icu_78::LocalPointer<icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Number> &)' 0:26.17 c:\devel\myUXP\intl\icu\source\common\unicode/localpointer.h(343): note: 'icu_78::LocalPointer<icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Number>::LocalPointer(const icu_78::LocalPointer<icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Number> &)': function was implicitly deleted because 'icu_78::LocalPointer<icu_78::message2::StandardFunctions::Number>' has a user-defined move constructor and v141_xp seems to be not good enough to build ICU 78. EDIT: got it fixed, -std:c++17 is needed by new ICU, so vc2015 branch will no longer be buildable as ICU can't be skipped. EDIT2: the above error is solved by adding a copy-ctr line in localpointer.h, all changes are in https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/9f6727874f81bf98ef3f54f046d14c6c5cfdc20f , and hope I did it right. I think I can make a special release tomorrow! And now I have a newer-than-mypal ICU and feodor2 may have a look?

info here It states that : Sometimes Microsoft released builds referred to as “Escrow”. Escrow means the development of a branch gets stopped and the code is being tested. If Microsoft or its testers don’t discover any serious bugs (“showstoppers”), the current build becomes the final milestone (usually RC or RTM, but sometimes there are also beta escrow builds). Escrow builds are usually handed out to TAP (Technology Adoption Program) testers, ISVs, IHVs, etc. http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/

https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/15325 (for reference: https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues/14923 )

Apparently, I'm not the only one who has noticed such abnormal delays when starting up Panda while system start: 16 minutes! That's record-breaking. Any other here observing similar issues? Until Panda fixes this bug, I will avoid using the latest version 22.03.05. When starting my Windows XP computer, I am not prepared to accept lazy compromises. The start-up process must run smoothly as I always managed in the past. Panda offers two different installers, one of which is a "legacy" one. This installer does not solve the delayed start-up problem either. All 22.0x.0x versions have start-up problems on my computer. Especially the PSANHost.exe process leads to a full utilisation of the system during computer start-up. During my tests and investigations, I have now also looked at older versions. One of these seems to run much better, with a start-up behaviour that appears almost normal. Let's see if this proves to be true over the next few days.

Apparently, I'm not the only one who has noticed such abnormal delays when starting up Panda while system start: 16 minutes! That's record-breaking. Any other here observing similar issues?

Thanks for mentioning fltmgr.sys build 6750/KB4493563 in your posts. Build 6750 works OK on my SSE-only Inspiron 7500. The Properties sheet of fltmgr.sys indicates as File Version: 5.2.3790.6750 (srv03_sp2_qfe_escrow.190315-1901), no idea what "escrow" specifically refers to. On my Inspiron 7500 with a Pentium IIi ["SSE-only" = Non-SSE2] I have tested/run OK the following versions of fltmgr.sys: - MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.2180 (WinXP SP2 32bit, 4Aug2004-19Jan2005) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.5512 (WinXP SP3 32bit, 13Apr2008) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.3959 (Win2003 SP2 32bit, 17Feb2007) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.5107 (KB2839229, 7Jan2013) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6750 (KB4493563, 16Mar2019) - MS fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (KB4512787, 11Jul2019) The above versions of fltmgr.sys work under both Non-SSE2 and SSE2. I don't use a special installer, just a file-copy after booting into another operating system. Are any additional registry entries necessary? Builds 5512, 5107, 6750 and 6912 seem to work OK under WinXP SP3 without additional registry entries.. "MS fltmgr.sys v5.1.2600.2180 (WinXP SP2 32bit, 4Aug2004-19Jan2005)" is a leftover on my Inspiron 7500 in \$ntservicepackuninstall$\, after the upgrade from WinXP SP2 to SP3. Its timestamp is 4Aug2004 and its file modificaton date is 19Jan2005. The big question now is: which build is the best one for WinXP SP3?

Notice: upstream pushed a big ICU update, and I may need to further look at the changes to see if any new changes are needed for our old target platforms, currently no ETA for upcoming new builds.

me have some knowledge of modifying Microsoft installer files. I've modified the update.inf file to a single file and removed files from Server 2003, except for fltmgr.sys, because it contains necessary registry entries. https://mega.nz/folder/noJVCRzL#VByCvDGgf7Y4EGTR4f-bmQ

I have now installed fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (11Jul2019) on my old 700MHz Inspiron 7500 under WinXP SP3, and everything works fine. Browsers with this old, slow laptop work MUCH less sluggishly under WinXP SP3 than with the original WinXP SP3 build 5512 when JavaScript is turned. I have made this posting with New Moon with fltmgr.sys build 6912 on this old laptop under WinXP SP3, which has now become much more useable. Thanks! Identical versions of fltmgr.sys v5.2.3790.6912 (11Jul2019) are contained in KB4512787 and KB4512788. I have not yet decided between the two builds 5107 and 6912 for WinXP. For now I will keep build 6912 installed under WinXP, to see whether any issues come up.

I tested the new Chromium on Win XP. It runs faster than Supermium. But there are a few things to note. The RAM consumption bug when C++ is installed can be resolved by adding the corrected_api_sets.zip folder from Supermium. In XP x64, there is enormous virtual memory consumption, and I haven't found a solution. WebGL is completely disabled, even the software version, which means that websites that require it do not work. Manifest v2 is available but disabled by default. You need to add the parameter --disable-features=ExtensionManifestV2Unsupported,ExtensionManifestV2Disabled to the shortcut. To disable the notification that the OS is not supported, add --test-type to the shortcut. The browser requires a CPU with SSE3. Browser crash during import fixed in version 144.

Even today, the proxies ProxHTTPSProxy, HTTPSProxy and ProxyMII have lost none of their importance for Windows XP. There are programmes that still run on Windows XP but require a secure TLS connection. A good example of this is Panda Antivirus Free, which requires such a connection to activate the user account, albeit only once.

Constant update about the current state of things from Rob Lee , PhD student (warstudies), focused on Russians and their war tech. Videos and analysis about russian/belarussian war crimes and atrocities like cluster bombing of peaceful cities , thermobaric weapons usage results, russian war tech movements , etc. Also, he wrote he removes videos with bodies and POWs. So OK to watch under 18. https://twitter.com/RALee85

Your statements are very confusing.What are you talking about? I know you never used it in Win 7 but you want to get it workung. Then you say you just want to get updates from the website like @xpandvistafan. But no one has got workung it until now. The problem is your English. You have to improve your way of articulating and to be more accurate in writing comments.

There he said he'd prefer the web version but he didn' t say he already had got working it. So @xpandvistafan does the web site version of MU work in your Windows 7 system?

AFAIK he hasn't got working it yet or have I missed anything? @xpandvistafan

So you tried both ways, app version and web site version, alternately and none of them is working. Right?

You are effected by error code 0x80072EFE too. It's not only 0x80070002, it's just the final output.

Please upload the Windows Update Log of Windows 7 only to have a look into! No screenshot, log file only!