Leaderboard

In comparison to Mypal 68.14.8b, I have executed the two JavaScript commands again in Mypal 68.14.7b: JavaScript commands: parseInt(Services.appinfo.platformVersion); Output: 68 parseInt(Services.appinfo.version); Output: 68 In any case, there is a clear version specification in the previous release.

Sorry but unfortunately, I have to disagree when it comes to Windows XP -> Windows NT 5.1 and Mypal 68. As you know, this topic here is about Mypal 68 in Windows XP . I have tested all possible Firefox version numbers by a SSUAO in Mypal 68.14.8b, and 128 was definitely the minimum to get rid of the yellow message box. Any version lower than 128 failed. Greetings, AstroSkipper

Here are some facts about versions inside Mypal 68.14.8b: JavaScript commands: parseInt(Services.appinfo.platformVersion); Output: 74 parseInt(Services.appinfo.version); Output: 68 ------------------------------------------ Some preferences in about:config: browser.migration.version: 94 extensions.lastAppVersion: 68.14.8 ------------------------------------------ General user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/88.0 Mypal/68.14.8 68, 74, 88, 94 Neither fish nor meat (German saying). Or, neither fish nor fowl. The problem with this is that there have been some significant changes in the Firefox versions from 69 to 72. If an extension receives the wrong Firefox version at a certain point, this can of course lead to malfunctions. And that's exactly what I think might be the case with the Custom Buttons extension. The other theory, that something elementary has been removed, of course remains. Strangely enough, a few typical error messages relating to the cbeditor.xml file have completely disappeared. Maybe, this file can't be correctly processed now. Possibly due to @feodor2's remove of XBL?

Ok. This issue seems to belong to all old browsers. To get rid off this yellow message box, you need an updated user agent. Firefox 128 is now the minimum under Windows XP: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0

@feodor2 Due to the changes in Mypal 68.14.8b, the Firefox Add-ons page shows the yellow message box even with compatible extensions "You need an updated version of Firefox for this extension". Here, for example, is the extension TWP - Translate Web Pages whose latest version 10.1.1.1 has a minimum version of 64: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/traduzir-paginas-web/ TBH, this message is now displayed on all extension pages, and it doesn't matter whether the extension is compatible or not. So, what's going on here? Somehow, your browser seems to have become versionless.

Found it! This driver worked for that member, I don't remember, probably, and most likely I gave it. https://drivers.softpedia.com/get/GRAPHICS-BOARD/NVIDIA/NVIDIA-GeForce-iCafe-Graphics-Driver-35573-for-XP.shtml

This hubbub is all irrelevant. Nevertheless one place checks MOZ_APP_VERSION So you can fix this diff --git a/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm b/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm index 8e009ac..42807e7 100644 --- a/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm +++ b/chrome/custombuttons/content/SelfHelper/SelfHelper.jsm @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ var AC, SelfHelper = { this.platform = ["win", "linux", "macosx"] .includes(platform) ? platform : "linux"; - this.version = parseInt(AppConstants.MOZ_APP_VERSION); + this.version = 74; if (this.version >= 95) { var pref = "extensions.custombuttons.prefersColorSchemeOverride"; var pb = Cc["@mozilla.org/preferences-service;1"].getService(Ci.nsIPrefBranch); I shall think out what to do with the version discord.

I see, but how any of this is related to 1050 Ti and its inability to use drivers under XP?

Booting from such a drive, no. Storing allegedly pirated content, such as films, games and 2160p WebRips, on an external drive with 4Kn sectors, yes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Format

A lot of evidence on youtube. With 1050??? Which driver?

( Happy Easter to all those who observe it ! ) New r3dfox releases have appeared on its GitHub repo : https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v128.9.0 ... and: https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v136.0.4 Many thanks to the maintainer! ...

I do not use YouTube-DL Gui 0.4 anymore. ytBATCH for Windows XP is much better. But I will have a look at it when I am back at my desktop computer.

Thanks. No, I have lots and lots of different hardware. Windows 7 sound is the worst, sandy, Win 8 is soooo soft, like Sony HiFi audio (if you remember the late 70s-80s, of course, you'll understand). XP isn't far away from 7, a bit punchier, but also over-bassy and flat (poor surround), like they smash you straight in the face. But if you listen to CDs with their 16bit primitivism and over-loaded, highly compressed to the "brick wall" audio, which totally suck in the first place, probably you won't notice. Edit: Read about loudness wars, and even if a CD is properly mastered, 16bit is still not enough. It's 60s tech.

Yeah, but 7z should *allegedly* compress the files, no? And it looks like it simply fails.

I used the drivers that came with the Xonar CD (which contained both Xp and Vista), but obviously not 11, hence I don't know and can't make judgements about 11. At that time, I had just D1, but later upgraded to the more advanced Xonar D2, The sound on Vista was fantastic, on XP and 7, very similar to what we were listening in the 80's terrible cassette walkmans. or similar to the garbage mp3. On Vista, I always choose 192Khz, of course not 44, and 44 is more like for partially deaf people, the ones who have nothing to lose in the terms of quality anyways. I served in the artillery, my hearing is damaged, and even I hear the clear difference in favour of Vista.

@mjd79, the new 135 is 400mb in size, is this normal?

Brave https://browserleaks.com/javascript

Make a dedicated topic to help you diagnose the trouble.

@Mark-XP, did my 347 driver suggestion help? Need further assistance?