feodor2
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by feodor2
-
May be you please tell private what did you find about, exactly what it wants. Also I just wanted to tell that sites I check with the thing still works on the firefox 115.
-
Okey I have fixed So old EWDK not suitable because of the buggy wrl stuff inside its sdk. I shall examine this further, I restored wrl to make angle work at least on win7, to try drop it again and fix for xp too, but when, this is so unimportant. For now go to EWDK_rs5_release_svc_prod2_17763_190129-1747 and apply the patch Also if you do not want go for newer EWDK you poke its wrl stuff and build anyway, not worth a time I think. Newer EWDK is huge yes, while you need the same amount as older and other throw out. win10sdk.patch
-
I do not remember, whatever, already told that 1.52 or 1.56 no matter is now obsolete and not needed. Did you fix this for now? I remember have put there mozwrlbase.h on intent. Also I dropped win10 sdk for a time, now I use win8 sdk, but it must work with default ewdks win10 sdk too. I shall look an fix.
-
Fixed Preserved in the old version https://github.com/Feodor2/Mypal68/wiki/Building-from-the-source/30279851bed8073b139d942c2d9d8de3a5982f1d About 1.52 likely not going to fix because it totally unnecessary now, what was built with 1.52 will do same with 1.62, of course you easy can fix youself if so really want. This is not funny at all, I think everybody involved will be fed-up with this totally redundant unnecessary s***, it is to be disabled by default at the very beginning. Did you give it to the upstream rust? Also I think rename it reasonable like "make cargo checksum fail not an error but a warning"
-
Still dont, if missing stuff is not far from 105 then next version will be repaired, hope they will not push some even worse. Actually they make obstacles all the time, I think about to drop it at all
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Then conclude that roytam browsers do not have this error. I to go to some common winxp topic -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
But the hate a wrong word here, may be the jealousy close more, after all we have parted good I think. And yes it had pushed me to take Firefox Quantum. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Uh you know about, guess why the Centaury. But scatter no way, shall I spend the time solely on the mypal, nevertheless you ask free may be I to give a good tip, whatever, I see you must add new functions too. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I got that all issue and Interesting about messing with it intentional to set 0xF0000000 -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Okey this is more than 2 months, how carefully to use for not having errors is another question. I also use hibernate but after no longer a months I have to do the restart because many errors. Also I must specify about hibernate with the user. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Ah yes a hibernate, assume it does not count, for example passed week running - then the week hibernate - then another week running - assume two weeks count Hey Palemoon is irrelevant at all as it not runs on winxp, but you tell please why would I hated it? Actually never and today just dont care -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
feodor2 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Did anybody use winxp machines without restart for months, actually 50 days. If there was any errors with any browser regarding? I myself never use any pc without restart for so long -
Okey I have gone to rust 1.62, to update patch slightly. Again the cmake gasket caused me troubles, uh what a stupid stubborn s*** it is, why anybody would use it at first place, why use unnecessary redundant tools at all - make only more complexity and then troubles of course. The one feature is the open source, so may rebuild from scratch with xp support restored, while this is totally not possible with msvc. On windows the same and to build all the stuff, actually I built with it old mypals 29. My be not so good as old msvc, which I liked before ucrt bloat.
-
Today I see github became unusable, not sure what they done, by it broken on Mypal. What about move issues to the codeberg? Yes There is no a particular level, I add only necessary things I see. Yes, do you remember we discussed this
-
No, I think there clearly indicated that it is llvm 9, but there where the one file missed though so I took it from rusts, not a require I think may take the file elsewhere it does nothing significant. Rust 35 I used in my very first builds, today it is unnecessary I tried llvm 10 and it puts code for modern windowses, is it possible make llvm not put modern code - yes of course. Meanwhile llvm 9 is still perfectly valid on 105 and I think so about 115, no point to switch it. Actually I use 9.0.1 version now.
-
These things added differently on every particular pc, depends on soft installed. Certainly it is wrong with your particular setup, check other browsers like roytams and firefox 52
-
Do you want me to add it for you in your pc? If this soory I wont. Users add this things by themselves. By the way I have torrent type already of my torrent program, I also have checked switch to Save File and its remembered, so actually you missed something. I suggest just to install torrent program and not to bother add it manually.
-
Did not expect that rust is so treacherous. I tried to build cbindgen from scratch, it downloaded something, now I fail with rust too. I know it keeps a kind of a sdk, likely it updated it and overwritten with new. This is very bad. I need restore old sdk I looking a way for not allow touching the sdk at all