Leaderboard

I think we have to take Shane's word for it that the patch has been applied to Supermium 132. As I said earlier, it's an ESR version, which surely should be capable of having the patch applied to it, as it should be fully supported until the next ESR version is released. I'm not sure how we can test whether the patch has been applied successfully or not.

@reboot12 Make some tests with disable and enable the Microsoft UAA drivers in System Devices. I remember, that I had the same problem and the admin @Dave-H here also with Baytrail Flex 10 and XP and sound Dietmar

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20250705-3219d2d-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20250705-3219d2d-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20250705-3219d2d-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250705-d849524bd-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250705-d849524bd-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250705-d849524bd-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20250705-d849524bd-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20250705-d849524bd-uxp-9175504ffc-w7plus-avx2.7z Official UXP changes picked since my last build: - Issue #2765 - Follow-up: Make scrollbar width checks use the originating non-NAC style context on Linux and Mac (af84337437) - Issue #2765 - Follow-up: Fix UAF when returning the non-NAC style context from a frameless node (6e358f1039) - Issue #2765 - Follow-up: Avoid declaring RefPtr in the return statement (e4630ce481) - Unprefix -moz-read-write / -moz-read-only (4cc014cb6b) No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20250712-3219d2d-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20250712-3219d2d-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20250712-3219d2d-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250712-d849524bd-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod.7z Win32 IA32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250712-d849524bd-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod-ia32.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win32-git-20250712-d849524bd-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20250712-d849524bd-uxp-b9ebe5b259-xpmod.7z Win7+ x64 AVX2 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.7a1.win64-git-20250712-d849524bd-uxp-b9ebe5b259-w7plus-avx2.7z Official UXP changes picked since my last build: - Issue #2106 - Part 1: Un-prefix -moz-user-select (cc55a380f6) - Issue #2106 - Part 2: Align value names (17b594b705) - No issue - Fix mixing of tabs with space-indented code. (552cb8dbcc) - Issue #2045 - Part 1: Revert "Temporarily force hidden elements to be actually hidden." (dd2cf17d30) - Issue #2045 - Part 2: Add handling and storage for the revert unit and value (7f3f90eed4) - Issue #2045 - Part 3: Implement cascade origin tracking to CSS parser (b0f0972314) - Issue #2045 - Part 4: Parse "revert" in property values wherever "unset" is allowed (9105c58a30) - Issue #2045 - Part 5: Serialize shorthands using "revert" like those containing "unset" (801d4a2db8) - Issue #2045 - Part 6: Treat "revert" values as the same as "unset" when encountered in the rule node (c4b6135c99) - Issue #2045 - Part 7: Override revert values during presentation hint cascade (166e98d2b9) - Issue #2045 - Part 8: Remap revert keyword values to a higher cascade level (a47f44e93d) - Issue #2045 - Part 9: Include the revert keyword in the list of accepted values for CSS properties returned by inDOMUtils (5346e55655) - Issue #2045 - Part 10: Regenerate devtools CSS database and include the revert keyword in related devtools code (f0b8d1df2c) - Issue #2106 - Part 3: Add 'contain' as user-select value, retain 'element' (e6b48fcc95) - [devtools] Further improve special character escaping in "copy as curl". (2d9cb22a28) - No Issue - Add detection for medium in border shorthand (9f7430f8b9) - Issue #2124 - Adjust overflow parser to handle two values (f4ffb1ec16) - Issue #2662 - Implement axis-shorthand parsing (7c52fd934f) - Issue #2124/2662: Optimize overflow shorthand parsing and serialization (7626c99ceb) - Issue #2124/2662: Cleaning of code (dae72b452c) - Issue #2106 - Follow-up: Additional Un-prefixing (1a5b3dcae6) - Issue #2106 - Follow-up: Un-prefix DOM Attribute MozUserSelect (abb891ff26) - Issue #2106 - Follow-up: Additional contain Keyword Entries (f1815317c3) - Issue #2106 - Clean-up: Remove Defunct -moz-user-select CSS Directives (8f46cd0d63) - Issue #2106 - Clean-up: Un-prefix -moz-user-select in Comments (b11affbdf3) - Issue #2780: Add back the mismatch overflow handling in nsRuleNode.cpp (c3590da576) - Issue #2757: Create a new basicShape of type inset then set inset coords to zero. (67421b3048) - Issue #2757 - Follow-up: Add clip-path test (manual QA) (3f67905afc) No official Pale-Moon changes picked since my last build. No official Basilisk changes picked since my last build. My changes picked since my last build: - gfx: relax DrawTargetCairo::IsValid() check, fixes crash when loading spectrumsurveys.com (10b96192dd) - layout: plug back alias of -moz-user-select so it won't break pages/extensions relying on this (4c8df426a8) Update Notice: - You may delete file named icudt*.dat inside program folder when updating from old releases. * Notice: From now on, UXP rev will point to `custom` branch of my UXP repo instead of MCP UXP repo, while "official UXP changes" shows only `tracking` branch changes.

Strange, but it appears that the issue has completely resolved itself.

At least the acronym (BSoD) will still be valid, since both black and blue begin with the letter 'b' c

Then it's a good idea to use the patched ungoogled for Server 2008 R2. No one knows and no one can guarantee how good and when the old 132 Supermium will (ever?) be patched for that serious vulnerability. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_138.0.7204.96 Edit/ They say it's been patched in R5. But in the article they say the patch is for 138+! Contradictory. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v132-r5

https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mj9c-f5v6-7665 Severity: High (8.1/10) https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2025/06/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_30.html Manual mitigation, at the expense of performance, if you don't want to update: https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium/issues/1024#issuecomment-3038992237

off topic: after using for 5 years and wrote ~90TB, my SN750 1TB lost from system first time. following experience from last time, I grabbed my unconnected idle 970evo+ and did a quick clone and let SN750 idle without electricity instead. time to find another m.2 stick with DRAM.

See: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=32478#p263454

Sotwe.com is working fine here in the UK on Supermium 132.0.6834.224 on XP.

Thanks for linking! Unfortunately, such comparisons are not particularly useful. It also depends considerably on other components such as the RAM memory, north and south bridge, the bus clock, the graphics adapter, processor features, hyper-threading and so on.

Not quite true. I use both my old Windows XP computer and my Android tablet for what you call "real work". And in some special cases, a notebook with Windows 7 and Windows 10. But that was not the point here. Anyway! This thread is actually about Mypal 68, and I am happy to confirm that this browser works well on my old hardware. And much better when optimised.

Probably @Cixert assumed, and rightfully so, the double engine of 360 Explorer or something similar would be implemented in Supermium, too.

@win32

You mean ChatGPT suffers a notorious paranoia?

There's something wrong with the latest (v2025.07.11) youtube-dl.exe build downloaded from GitHub: https://github.com/nicolaasjan/youtube-dl/releases/tag/2025.07.11 https://github.com/nicolaasjan/youtube-dl/releases/download/2025.07.11/youtube-dl.exe youtube-dl -vU => [debug] System config: [] [debug] User config: [] [debug] Custom config: [] [debug] Command-line args: ['-vU'] [debug] Encodings: locale cp1253, fs mbcs, out cp737, pref cp1253 [debug] youtube-dl version 2025.07.11 [debug] Lazy loading extractors enabled [debug] Single file build [debug] Python 3.4.4 (CPython x86 32bit) - Windows-Vista-6.0.6003-SP2 - OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015 [debug] exe versions: none [debug] Proxy map: {} Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Users\nico\Desktop\youtube-dl_source\youtube_dl\update.py", line 48, in update_self File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 470, in open File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 580, in http_response File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 502, in error File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 442, in _call_chain File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 685, in http_error_302 File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 470, in open File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 580, in http_response File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 508, in error File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 442, in _call_chain File "c:\Program Files (x86)\Python3.4.4\lib\urllib\request.py", line 588, in http_error_default urllib.error.HTTPError: HTTP Error 404: Not Found ERROR: can't find the current version. Please try again later. The previous compile, of version 2025.06.26: https://github.com/nicolaasjan/youtube-dl/releases/download/2025.06.26/youtube-dl.exe , behaves as expected: youtube-dl -vU => [debug] System config: [] [debug] User config: [] [debug] Custom config: [] [debug] Command-line args: ['-vU'] [debug] Encodings: locale cp1253, fs mbcs, out cp737, pref cp1253 [debug] youtube-dl version 2025.06.26 [debug] Lazy loading extractors enabled [debug] Single file build [debug] Python 3.4.4 (CPython x86 32bit) - Windows-Vista-6.0.6003-SP2 - OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015 [debug] exe versions: none [debug] Proxy map: {} youtube-dl is up to date (2025.06.26) Many thanks for your ongoing efforts towards maintaining support for "our" older OSes ...

Did you try to launch it on Vista with SM files? See if MV2 will also be supported?

So I updated my Vista SP2 x64 to 2016, still no joy. Chromium for Windows 7 by e3kskoy7wqk starts with the same method! Ideas? I don't understand what else CatsXP wants, aren't those both made for win 7?

they did this because they want jemalloc to be integrated into C runtime, which is un-recommended by MS later.

Yes, I can. Then leave only one, what stops you? Never heard of XP using two modern cards all at once in one setup troub;e free.

It appears that Windows Defender Updates may not work any longer without the Windows Update service enabled. Tried to enable the update service, and it worked. Turning off the service and trying to update Defender fails with an error now.

That was clear, but from what they tell, looks like the patch is intended to be applied only to 138+. Who would write a patch for the old 132, while we are at 140+ already?

i was referring to group of people they selected even more ironic they taped it and showed to public you can still find it, bunch of brainless people who never used pc...

im not certain, it would requie to read out all the stuff that has been done related to this patches the /3GB is known to have some problems too, i dont know the problems with it j7n maybe has some knowledge here ? if its a problem with the /3GB switch there would be also the /USERVA switch to set a different value (between 2048 and 3072 (3 gb)) https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/memory/4-gigabyte-tuning the one from dibya only use a small patch - maybe that would be worth a shot daniel k.´s patch use more of changes, maybe static offsets - that would be a reason why they dont work together also the method daniel k. described could trigger a crash not certain what "the russian patch" do to solve this problem is at the moment to much things around, i might can tell the norm´s, talks, idea´s a debug analize for example would take some time but if it comes to new work im busy at the moment sorry i also dont have the function test for dibya´s patch (aka if it passes the 4 gb limit) there should be someone to try these patches with the method j7n did to do so is simple just disabling the pagefile, then starting up app´s/executables that eat up more then 4 GB of ram if that is possible that patch is likely to work

hmmm in the past we had often a discussion about "32 bit is the 4 gb limit" or = 32 wires 32 bits can form 2^32 bits therefore 4´294´967´296 what represents 4 GB the problem with that is that even in 8 or 16 bit´s there are so called selectors those do actually still exits in 32 bit too also very important is that these 4 GB of possible "addresses" are not converted into that rather the representing PTE´s and PDE´s represent to a 4 KB page (in old normal 32 bit style) so going with that if you have 4 GB/ 4 k pages you end up in only using 20 bits ! (20 bits * 4k = 4 GB) a idea (very similiar to the discussion about 4 k sectors and 4 MB sectors with the harddrive(hdd/ssd)) would be just to increase the 4 K pages to 4 MB pages that would be 1024 times as much RAM the discussion about this are elder thats why that bit (PSE (page size extension)) was 1 candidate to pass that 32 bit limit the other candidate was the PAE bit (physical address extension) here is 1 catch PSE can extend the 4 GB by increasing the page size (even with a 32 bit PDE´s and PTE´s) in PAE mode PDE´s and PDE´s are 64 bit (yes even in 32 bit mode), that´s one of the reasons why PAE can address more then 4 GB of ram (to be more precise paging are mechanism´s there also some more things they play a role the CR3 register (also called the page directory base register) or the GDT, it would be to long to explain all but lets stay like this for now) so let us take the next important step in the old 32 bit system without PSE,PAE or "concrete use of segments", an app/executable had to use up the 4 GB ram because there was a user-mode (ring3) and a kernel-mode (ring0) there had to be a part in kernel mode and a other part in user-mode offsets are not a problem (as you can map a address like 0xFFFFFFFF to page 0 if you wanted) deviding the kernel mode and user mode is important, if that would not be the case every crash on a normal app/execuble would be a entire OS crash (BSOD or wrose) so the solution was simple usermode 0x00000000 - 0x7FFFFFFF - kernelmode 0x80000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF thats how the eldest 32 bit norms work it is not to bad to have kernel mode ram because many modules actually need space in memory (its not like an app is just made out of the app itself the app consits of many modules that also use ram internal) - also the video frame buffer often has a kernel mode area that takes memory for example so here we finally have our split 0x00000000 - 0x7FFFFFFF (2 gb) + 0x80000000 - 0xFFFFFFFF (2 gb) = 4 GB the app/executable now has the problem that it cant directly use the kernel mode offsets (it certainly use them but rather passiv (its some memory you need less in your app)) for this microsoft then made the /3 GB option in this one usermode has 3 GB and kernelmode 1 Gb (0x00000000-0xBFFFFFFF) + (0xC0000000-0xFFFFFFFF) = 4 GB but now the important part those offsets are not physical addresses ! actually you can map every of that "offset´s" to different places in memory (including the ones above 4 GB RAM) so thats why multiple applications/executables can use up the entire 64 GB of RAM (in j7n example he had 20 GB of 64 GB possible) thats more then 4 GB of ram and the proofes XP 32 bit can do it that way now we also have to mention the ramdisc solution, if you have like 20 GB of data and map then into the physical ram then the ramdisc use a chuck-wise solution it then maps for example 1 GB of that 20 GB data into an offset (that goes like fast) (when it wants the next part it just maps the next part - but it is chuckwise) now we have to mention the pagefile, in the pagefile windows stores memory data on the harddrive (HDD/SSD) when windows wants it use exactly that trick (it loads the data from the harddrive into that virtual offset) but this time there is an important differenz - the data is not from a RAM memory - it has to load that from the harddrive (and that is slow) for a SSD its faster - but still not as fast as it would be in memory so i guess some have reconized the increase in speed with SSD`s ? now you have a little more precision why this is the case so now to the part why a "normal app/executable" actually dont pass that 4 GB ram ram limit i already explained why it is rather like 2-3 GB ram + some kernel mode memory that is rather used like passiv but now the reason why it actually dont go beyond the 4 GB ram in "just one application/executable" here you have to know that all compilers form the past-now dont use segment selectors to pass that 4 GB ram i never seen a compiler that would be able to do so. probaly windows xp (even up to win10) dont have code for this either. but here is the thing normally in a code flow of a debugger you see a offset (or better called vitual offset this time) for the code flow it use a register called EIP (instruction pointer) - the E stands for 32 bits - for example only IP for 16 bit and REIP for 64 bit (R means 64bit) but here is the next catch ... the most common debuggers dont show the selector but for the code flow the CPU use a combination of a segment selector + virtual offset (the one you see in a debugger for example) this is called the CS:EIP combination - where CS is the segment selector (called the CODE SEGMENT(short CS) selector) EIP E for 32 bit and IP for instruction pointer now might be a good time to call out a wiki page about that: https://wiki.osdev.org/Segmentation that CS selector is 16 bits wide (in 32 bits) and 16 bits means 65536 possible selctors ... so the combination 16:32 or CS:EIP would be 65536 * 4 GB - that would be theoretical 262144 GB that it could select (+ you have 6 of segment selectors all in range 0-65536) but here is the catch windows (either xp - 10) dont use this to pass the 4 GB limit the only things windows actually did with these registers is that they point to small pieces of memory (like the EPROCESS structure) that is possible - but it leaves out the use to pass the 4 GB of ram limit by just using a few kilobytes with that method ... here is an example where microsoft accesses a small piece of ram using a selector : https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20220919-00/?p=107195 (the problem with the way this is used, it not used that to pass the 4 GB ram limit, rather is use that as small memory storage) so the next step: back to the app/executable as mentioned there is no compiler that actually generate the useage of segmentation ... therefore you would need a specific app/executable that can do so - and that means chrome still would not pass the 4 GB ram limit (because it cant use segmention) (and then you also would need the windows operating system code also to control this kind of memory managment) also to mention is the FPU unit even the elder ones are 64 bit (or bigger) in modern cpu´s they are 512 bits (AVX) so actually you can make 64 bit moves in 32 bits or calculations, compessions like h.265 do so also some routines are written in the FPU, for example cpu intense sort mechanism´s - you might heared MMX, SSE ect. so in short 32 bit has 64 bit commands that it can use over the FPU unit (what is actually done sometimes) it can pass the 4 GB of ram over multiple app´s/executables it cant pass more then 4 GB of ram with just one app/executable - unless it use a chuckwise method (like the ramdisc) - the segment registers are actually not used to pass the 4 GB ram limit(that also goes for win10 32 bit) so i tryed my best to explain this as simple as i could

*facepalm the vista experiment among id*** if i have to write it like so ...

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20250705-7bda12e7-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20250705-7bda12e7-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20250705-id-656ea98-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20250705-id-656ea98-ia-c642e3c-uxp-9175504ffc-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild

But it existed before! It'd be confusing.

That is, the breaking of the engine or V8 by author continues. The question is for what reason? The author doesn't have to do anything with it to maintain legacy OS compatibility.

Does anyone else use Supermium with Instagram? The reason I ask is because recent versions for me seem to have trouble with the overlays which should come up if you click on the link in a post to view the comments. What often happens for me is that the screen darkens down, but the overlay does not appear. The only way I can view the whole list of comments is to open the link in a new tab, which I shouldn't have to do. The equivalent overlay on Facebook works fine. I'm pretty sure this isn't being cause by any of my extensions. I did suspect uBlock, but I've switched it off on IG and the problem is still happening.

Unlike in your country Armenia, in France sellers are under certain obligations before the customers, for example: they can't refuse to serve basic needs items like soap, condoms, cosmetics, refrigerators, etc. As for the Chanel bags I was going to buy, unfortunately, they can because they belong to the luxury segment. So no, he can't put deadbolts because he registered as a seller and owns a website that he must maintain in accordance with the French laws. And if we speak about that site in particular, the laws of Quebec, which aren't that different because they are an off-spring from France.

I strongly suggest you all simply ignore those dimwits. let their businesses go bankrupt. Enough of this nonsense. Recently, I was willing to spend several grands on a bag, yet I have problems with their site. I'll think twice now. And looks like they just lost a customer. In details. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186728-chanel-french-bags-website-err_http2_protocol_error-from-my-ip-blocked-from-vpn-too/

He lied to you, the owner simply put the slider to the "maximum protection". Again, Cloudflare could care less what the owner chooses.

I am not always right. But a pure comparison of CPUs is not sufficient. Read here, for example, about the difference between SD-RAM and DDR2-RAM: https://www.transcend-info.com/support/faq-296#:~:text=DDR2 SDRAM(Double Data Rate,(double of DDR SDRAM). Maybe now you'll realise what I'm talking about. And apart from that, an Intel Pentium 4 is not the same as an Intel Pentium 4. There were different series like Willamette, Northwood, and Prescott. And within these series different FSB clock rates. So, forget about these comparison sites! The only way to compare our computers is doing the same test regarding all hardware components. P.S.: Due to my motherboard layout, there are several bottlenecks. Firstly, the extremely slow SD-RAM memory, then the very low bus clock rate and finally the AGP 4x interface, although my graphics card actually is an AGP 8x one.

Please, don't come up with your "gut feelings"! I have presented all the essential facts that you have not commented on. My presentation has nothing to do with subjectivity and hypotheses. But as I said, it's offtopic here anyway and actually totally irrelevant. Your cucumber is old and mine is many years older.

Bride

Share

Done! https://msfn.org/board/topic/186225-change-a-letter-game-part-ii/?do=findComment&comment=1266415

And now, disable Circular Kernel Context Logger and Audio logger. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WMI\Autologger] "Status"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WMI\Autologger\Audio] "Start"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WMI\Autologger\Circular Kernel Context Logger] "Start"=dword:00000000

WMItracing.log OFF (Vista) Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WBEM\Tracing\WMI] "SessionEnabled"=dword:00000000 "Level"=dword:00000000

Thanks for clarification! I will edit it to my needs.

No such ads here.

Spring

Reading. (town in Berkshire)

Knickerbocker Glory

Did you also try different user agents on this website?

@dmiranda, @Ascii2 Do you still use custom buttons at all? This was actually my initial question. What do you think about custom buttons in general? And have you ever tried the Pref Toggler custom button or my modded version I recently presented here?

Chip NEC D720200AF1 has certified Dell Vista drivers. Supported Operating Systems Windows Vista, 32-bit Windows Vista, 64-bit Windows XP Windows XP, 64-bit Don't worry about the Dutch language link, it will switch to yours automatically (it depends on the location). https://www.dell.com/support/home/nl-nl/drivers/driversdetails?driverid=36x7d

Thank you for the detailed explanation!