All Activity
- Past hour
-
Broadcom NetXtreme II 5708 Windows NT 4.0 driver
ruthan replied to ruthan's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
My memory is not working well, but im like 95% sure that i already tried these.. Soggies drivers - they failed more than once for me, it could be about skill, but i doubt it.. Because you can download lots of drivers which claims that support HW X,Y,Z and some old OS, but nobody tested them and they worked worked, its very easy edit inf and add some new option.. There are also drivers which simply claim NT suppport na never is mentioned lowest supported OS, so in theory they should work on NT, WIn2000.. but they never do, its often because some MS driver kit helper version, which rely on specific OS features.. -
Well Uniprocessor means Uniprocesor means not more multicore usage, or its still fine for multicore cpus? I have now 2 cpus in this machine. For me another PCI and PCI-X cards are working fine, even this one is half working, it just not keeps working after reboot.. It would probably need some HEX ASM magician to find out why.. Or find some old thread where someone fixed it, or find another card, which has good NT4/Win9x/Win2000/WinXP/Win7 driver and working with SBEMU in MS-DOS.
- Today
-
Copy the FOLDER NAME, delete the FOLDER, then create a *FILE* with the same exact NAME but *without* any file extension. Windows will not allow a FOLDER and a FILE by the same exact NAME. The presence of the FILE *prevents* the folder of the same name from being created. ie, you will never have to delete the folder ever again because it cannot be created.
-
hmm trying to get a view do you use a kernel extender ? some are partial functional and use the same folder what software you are using ? if you turn off many of them and limit the software, would be something the OS in this case xp has background activity for the system - but first would be the software to be turned off you know how to handle a file logger ? maybe microsoft´s filemon a lot of these files are not cookies - your search is for changes - activity also caused changes like stats, or that deskop.ini is not a cookie file https://www.techbloat.com/what-is-desktop-ini-on-windows.html
-
Drew Hoffman started following Native (WDM) HD Audio driver for Windows 98se/Me
-
https://github.com/andrew-hoffman/WDMHDA This audio driver now functions well in VMWare and VirtualBox, and may work on some real hardware with an Intel controller and Realtek audio codec. More testing and work is still needed. Any compatibility reports would be appreciated.
-
justacruzr2 started following Unusual Folder Behaviour
-
I've had this strange folder behaviour in XP Pro MCE for some time and I'm trying to correct it. Although it's currently Media Center Edition, it was doing this when it was only XP Pro so I hope no one minds me posting this in the XP forum. I added the MCE ability later. Anyway, here's what's happening. The system creates extra Cookies, History and Temporary Internet Files folders in C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\Temp. Those folders already exist under C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\Cookies and C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\History and Temporary Internet Files. That's where they're supposed to be. So I'm trying to figure out why they're being duplicated in C:\Documents and Settings\LocalService\Local Settings\Temp which is not where they're supposed to be. I checked the registry for any LocalService\Local Settings entries but nothing looked wrong. Yet, something is telling Explorer to create those folders there. I can delete them but they are re-created on every boot. The snapshots show 2 views of this. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks.
-
Is it possible to install Win NT 4.0 on LGA775 chipset?
reboot12 replied to PowerPC_7455's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
I use WinNT 4.0 on Haswell with NVIDIA 6200 TurboCache + 71.84 driver. HAL must be Standard PC (HAL.DLL) -
Broadcom NetXtreme II 5708 Windows NT 4.0 driver
reboot12 replied to ruthan's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
@ruthan Yea, on WinNT 4.0 works only some Broadcom chips. I bought several PCIe cards and only the third one worked: https://www.vogons.org/viewtopic.php?p=1383896#p1383896 BCM57782 - not work BCM5761 - not work BCM5722 - work OK I use this driver: 10.62.1.2 from https://soggi.org/drivers/broadcom.htm#NetX -
I recently started a topic, there are 2 replies 0 views: PowerStrip on Windows NT 4.0 SP6 There are also 0 views on other topics:
-
@modnar PowerStrip 3.7x runs on WinNT 4.0 but requires a supported graphics card - I test PCIe NVIDIA 6200 TurboCache with DVI-HDMI cable. For the program to work, you need to delete or rename the nvgpio.dll file to nvgpio.bak I use NVIDIA driver 71-84-winnt4-international.exe. PowerStrip detects and write EEPROM EDID without any problems - unless it is write-protected, of course. It can only program 128 bytes EDID: P.S. Only PowerStrip 3.85 can program EDID 256 bytes but under WinXP - tested same NVIDIA 6200 graphics card but only with vga.sys driver. The NVIDIA driver cannot be installed !!!
-
Is the problem with int 13h during the part of the booting process before the driver even loaded?
-
released: bug fix for win32k.sys/fsg_RunPreProgram
Start Me Up replied to Start Me Up's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
Sorry for the misunderstanding, but I am looking for updates that I haven't listed, yet. There should be something like 10 or 20 different versions of win32k.sys. But I know only the 3 I listed. -
released: bug fix for win32k.sys/fsg_RunPreProgram
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Start Me Up's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
ie, will the win32k.sys file get you what you need? or is the KB....... that it was pulled from required? -
released: bug fix for win32k.sys/fsg_RunPreProgram
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Start Me Up's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
I have at least ONE in your list. BUT please note that I did not do XP Updates in the past by way of KB....... files. I slipstreamed from well-known Update Packs so I technically have this/these as a "WIN32K.SY_" file inside an XP install disk's "I386" folder. It's just a zip-compressed "win32k.sys" so 'inside' is the untouched file embedded inside an Update Pack. -
Looks like their compatibility claims are bogus. I have a few older versions than you listed and also 3.70 (last good: with normal AltGr function for key shortcuts), but never ran any on WinNT 4.0, only Win2000...
-
Hello Windows 2000 fans, when using vanilla Windows 2000 with a rather new version of win32k.sys, there is a bug in the function "fsg_RunPreProgram" which reduces that drawing quality of some fonts. This bug was fixed with the version 5.00.2195.7610 by Microsoft. However, it was reintroduced into the operating system shortly afterwards, so it still exists in the newest version of win32k.sys (5.00.2195.7640). To fix this bug there are 2 ways: Use Extended Kernel 3.1H or newer. Blackwingcat fixed this bug. If you don't like or can't install Extended Kernel, there is now a second option available: WINDOWS2000-OTSKB3037639-V1-X86-INTL.exe There is an article in the knowledge database available with more information on the nature of this bug. There is some more auxilliary information available, which I do not plan to distribute among end users: code.htm --- If someone likes to help with an upcoming Windows 2000 update: I am looking for Windows XP updates which contain a version of win32k.sys. My list of known updates is currently pretty short: KB3013455 contains version 5.1.2600.6712 KB3034344 contains version 5.1.2600.6755 KB4039384 contains version 5.1.2600.7334 Thank you.
-
Flash 9 not working on NT 4.0? (consolidated thread)
reboot12 replied to ironman14's topic in Windows 2000/2003/NT4
What flash sites work in WinNT 4.0? - Yesterday
-
After December 2025 Patch Tuesday, Windows Defender on 1607 can't download definition update when WU is disabled. But offline update still works.
-
Experimenting with GPT and Hard Disks >2TB under WinXP
user57 replied to Multibooter's topic in Windows XP
the same discussions where around in the past from what the xbox solution was just to increase the sector size from 512 to 4096 - also there is some information about that this has problems either a problem with system based buffers or with user buffers also the one core api is saying to have that problem solved having current informations would be fine