Kiki Burgh Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 hi IcemanND! i use your tool everytime i back-up drivers, esp for UA installation ... would there be a chance this great tool could get an update? thanks!
IcemanND Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 I intend to update it for WIn7 and full 64-bit, but my real work is going to have to slow down a little bit before it is going to happen.
Kiki Burgh Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 thank you! looking forward to it. cheers!
lodoss900 Posted February 8, 2010 Posted February 8, 2010 would someone point me to the updated version of IcemanND's softwaremucho gracias
IcemanND Posted February 8, 2010 Author Posted February 8, 2010 Updated for what? currently what is here is what there is.
willko Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 (edited) Where can I download version 2.1.83 please? ( as per Ricktendo's helpful video)See attached screenshotLOL!!! - check my link ... DOH!!! Edited February 21, 2010 by willko
IcemanND Posted February 21, 2010 Author Posted February 21, 2010 Hmmm, I vaguely recall having done that to fix a specific problem Ricktendo was experiencing. I'll look for it and update when i find it, might take me a day to search my backups.Didn't know he put it in a video, I certainly haven't seen my royalty check yet.
ricktendo Posted February 21, 2010 Posted February 21, 2010 Hmmm, I vaguely recall having done that to fix a specific problem Ricktendo was experiencing. I'll look for it and update when i find it, might take me a day to search my backups.Didn't know he put it in a video, I certainly haven't seen my royalty check yet.Its a FREE video I did on how to backup & integrate drivers, recommended your tool over Driver Genius and other driver backup progies because you rename the inf fine (you don't leave it as oem#.inf)
IcemanND Posted February 22, 2010 Author Posted February 22, 2010 Completely forgot I did that version. Must be working for you.v2.1.8.3 added to first post.
ricktendo Posted February 22, 2010 Posted February 22, 2010 (edited) Yup, you had me test it for you a loooooong time ago (you were making a version that does not require .net 1.1), used it when I had Vista and now with Windows 7 (works like a charm) it only needs mscomctl.ocx activex runtime or one of those Edited February 22, 2010 by ricktendo64
IcemanND Posted February 22, 2010 Author Posted February 22, 2010 Yup, you had me test it for you a loooooong time ago (you were making a version that does not require .net 1.1), used it when I had Vista and now with Windows 7 (works like a charm) it only needs mscomctl.ocx activex runtime or one of thoseKnew there was something it needed.
wingbird Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Outstanding - everyone was right including yourself were right iceman, this kicks all other driver backup tools out of the ballparkThanks a lot for this
jaclaz Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 mscomctl.ocx is part of the VB6 Common Controls package:http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896559/en-usThe good guys at MS have made it so that you need to have it in order to be allowed to have it :http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=en&FamilyID=25437d98-51d0-41c1-bb14-64662f5f62feOverviewThis package updates two Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 Common Controls: mscomctl.ocx and comctl32.ocx to address the issues described in the KB articles noted in the Related Resources section on this page. This package will not install these Common Controls if they do not already exist on the target system. This package cannot be uninstalled.This package is provided under the terms of the End User License Agreement and is intended for the following customers:Customers who are Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 and/or Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0 licensees.Customers who are not licensees of Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 nor Microsoft Visual Studio 6.0 but are using older versions of the two Common Controls.And of course the good Linux guys have a way to get it nonetheless http://www.kegel.com/wine/winetricksthe limit is your conscience.The files are also in VB6 SP6:http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=9EF9BF70-DFE1-42A1-A4C8-39718C7E381D&displaylang=enbut NOT in the REDISTRIBUTABLE "Service Pack 6 for Visual Basic 6.0: Run-Time Redistribution Pack (vbrun60sp6.exe)"http://support.microsoft.com/kb/290887http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=7B9BA261-7A9C-43E7-9117-F673077FFB3C&displayLang=enBut they are in the http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957924/en-ushttp://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=CB824E35-0403-45C4-9E41-459F0EB89E36&displaylang=en&displaylang=enwhich has NOT requirements like the ones on the mentioned VB6 Common Controls page.The even more interesting part is that the file is available here:http://activex.microsoft.com/controls/vb6/mscomctl.cabInfo taken from:http://web.archive.org/web/20050223232418/http://support.microsoft.com/kb/193366/en-usBasically, if you call mscomctl.ocx an ActiveX control you can download it freely, if you call it "VB6 file" you cannot.Which means two things:the MS guys are to say the least "mercurial"the Linux guys are sometimes not as "kosher" as they like to depict themselves And a third one :why the heck this nice program needs an unredistributable file in order to work?jaclaz
IcemanND Posted March 1, 2010 Author Posted March 1, 2010 And a third one :why the heck this nice program needs an unredistributable file in order to work?jaclazAt the time of that re-write I was trying to stay away from .NET since it was not yet widely distributed/downloaded/installed and everyone was complaining about it. Much easier to find and install the activex control than the .NET redistributable, at the time. Maybe the next version if I do one I'll do in full .NET instead of using .NET to wrap the code in like the first version.I believe the check-listbox is the control that requires it, and there isn't one that works as easily built into the VB6 arch.
jaclaz Posted March 1, 2010 Posted March 1, 2010 Maybe the next version if I do one I'll do in full .NET instead of using .NET to wrap the code in like the first version.Please don't! We have just found a perfectly legal and easy way to get from Microsoft a .cab sized 479,056 bytes(compressed) that ends up as a 1,069,376 .ocx file that makes your nice app work perfectly and you want to replace it with a few tens of thousands of bloat? If you are gonna rewrite it from scratch, use Assembler. Completely OT, but check what can be done in 164,362 bytes:http://www.quickersoft.com/donkey/http://www.quickersoft.com/donkey/winexplorer.htmjaclaz
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now