September 20, 200520 yr Author hope you dont plan to use ms office, as it doubt it will ever work in this windows
September 20, 200520 yr hope you dont plan to use ms office, as it doubt it will ever work in this windows<{POST_SNAPBACK}>That can be done, just a few files and a bunch of reggies...
September 20, 200520 yr This project is great, I was looking for a way to remove all the crud from windows to make it my gaming OS ( I use linux as my mainstream OS) and I found this, which is what I wanted and more.By the way is this going to be released soon or should I install normal windows for the time being?
September 21, 200520 yr oct ... sumthingth<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Not unless I can help unless u wanna do it urself np
September 21, 200520 yr ive been trying a thing to shrink .dll s...<{POST_SNAPBACK}>gdogg, if you're not already aware of it, this may be of use to you as well...UPX.i started compressing FF and TB exe's/dll's and noticed a significant decrease in load times, plus the space savings. you just have to be careful what switches you use.
September 21, 200520 yr ive been trying a thing to shrink .dll s...<{POST_SNAPBACK}>gdogg, if you're not already aware of it, this may be of use to you as well...UPX.i started compressing FF and TB exe's/dll's and noticed a significant decrease in load times, plus the space savings. you just have to be careful what switches you use.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>Dude, if u wanna open an upx compressed exe, the loadtime isnt faster, coss it hass to decompress the exe first, and then launch it... Check their website.
September 22, 200520 yr Author fridge , ok just as I thoughtthis guy left me all confuesed and stuffnever though compressing somethng could make it faster either
September 22, 200520 yr I did that some time ago, and I can confirm it makes loading and even browsing in Firefox a bit faster. But it requires more CPU when starting up, I think. Maybe also when rendering web pages.
September 22, 200520 yr Author hmm interestingshould this work with optimised firefox too?cause its already dammmnn fastlike 1/3 or 1/8 the load times of regular firefox , they even got one for thurderbird, i just grabed it now, also, much faster load timesyou should really check them out, http://www.moox.ws/tech/mozilla/ Edited September 22, 200520 yr by gdogg
September 23, 200520 yr I did that some time ago, and I can confirm it makes loading and even browsing in Firefox a bit faster. But it requires more CPU when starting up, I think. Maybe also when rendering web pages.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>launching execuatable, windows places executable in memmory --> it launcheswith upxlaunchin executable, decompressing to memmory --> it launchesChecked other forums as well, its only a space saver on ur harddisk, cause it eats even more memmory according to some :/
September 23, 200520 yr i UPX'd all of FF exe's and dll's i can state for a fact that load time has decreased by about 1 second, both cold and warm. warm is now right about 2 seconds with quite a few plugins. this is without windows prefetching. i never checked CPU usage however. Edited September 23, 200520 yr by atomizer
September 23, 200520 yr Author ok, first load on my computer is 2 seconds, warm boot isn't even 1 second, maybe 1/8th a second, so i think its all good for me to not bother with itare you using the optimised firefox builds yet? Edited September 25, 200520 yr by gdogg
September 25, 200520 yr I have to say that I'm looking forward to a USB-thumbdrive version of Windows XP, that isn't based on the Embedded XP's... This project is inspiration for all of us that have tried things like this ourselves, and failed....
Create an account or sign in to comment