atomizer Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 @MJC -- if you have (or think you'll have) enough people interested in your project, you may be able to cut down on your code by making a nice base that would allow for plug-ins???
EchoNoise Posted July 15, 2005 Posted July 15, 2005 PLUG-INS !!now why didn't i think of that*swipes all blueprints from atomizers table and sneaks off into the darkness*
blinkdt Posted July 16, 2005 Posted July 16, 2005 I see this tool as being for the developer of a specific toolset rather than for an end user.For exampleA hardware developer wants to include his own drivers in a Windows installation, for example a new SCSI controller chipset. He creates an info.xml file describing his driver, and AIOG modifies the files accordingly.A software developer wants to provide his own stripped down version of Windows. He provides a list of the APIs he needs access to, and AIOG strips down everything except his desired APIs and their dependancies.A system integrator wants to provide an automatically updating Remote Installation Services image with the latest drivers and hotfixes for testing with his software/hardware configurations. He provides an info.xml describing his RIS configurations, and it runs via at or cron to update RIS images once per week.Wow. This goes waaaay beyond what the average MSFNer is trying to accomplish, me thinks. Create an info.xml file? Provide a list of APIs? Hahahahaha. I think you just scared the "Idiots." At least, I hope you did.Yeah, how 'bout it, Alanoll? I wrote the script for him and then he had the balls to ask others to test it for him.
mjc Posted July 16, 2005 Author Posted July 16, 2005 @MJC -- if you have (or think you'll have) enough people interested in your project, you may be able to cut down on your code by making a nice base that would allow for plug-ins???<{POST_SNAPBACK}>The application is turning out to be a framework, where you create XML files to describe patches/reshacks/OEM addons/slipstreams/removals/etc.Thus, the hardest part (which is mostly done already) is creating the app itself, and the rest is creating the descriptions for all the various projects around msfn and google.
mjc Posted July 16, 2005 Author Posted July 16, 2005 I see this tool as being for the developer of a specific toolset rather than for an end user.For exampleA hardware developer wants to include his own drivers in a Windows installation, for example a new SCSI controller chipset. He creates an info.xml file describing his driver, and AIOG modifies the files accordingly.A software developer wants to provide his own stripped down version of Windows. He provides a list of the APIs he needs access to, and AIOG strips down everything except his desired APIs and their dependancies.A system integrator wants to provide an automatically updating Remote Installation Services image with the latest drivers and hotfixes for testing with his software/hardware configurations. He provides an info.xml describing his RIS configurations, and it runs via at or cron to update RIS images once per week.Wow. This goes waaaay beyond what the average MSFNer is trying to accomplish, me thinks. Create an info.xml file? Provide a list of APIs? Hahahahaha. I think you just scared the "Idiots." At least, I hope you did.Yeah, how 'bout it, Alanoll? I wrote the script for him and then he had the balls to ask others to test it for him.<{POST_SNAPBACK}>The idea is to take all the various projects (rvm, reshacker-based stuff, nlite-style removals, etc) and make an XML description for it. once that's done, the entire process can be automated.It will at some point be "wizard"-level easy, but it needs to be extendable, and I am doing it in such a manner that the entire project is, in and of itself, a pluginfest.Obviously there are no plugins available =) and as such these are the uses. But to share one's AIOG modifications all they have to do is unzip/unrar/7unzip/etc to the plugins directory and then enable the modification in AIOG.
Corn~Julio Posted July 17, 2005 Posted July 17, 2005 mjc You Wrote# Downloads and slipstreams the appropriate service pack# Downloads and installs the latest RyanVM pack (this should instead be downloading and installing the latest hotfixes directly from MS in the future)Would You Add An Option To Install These From A Source Location If You Already Have Them Downloaded ??
dirtwarrior Posted July 21, 2005 Posted July 21, 2005 How is the work progressing on this. Keep us posted ok?
riverrm Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 mjc, great project. I've been working on some of the components you mentioned over the past few months of and on.Ambitious project. My take on Hotfixes: should be downloaded from ms directly(licensing/security). I wouldn't use a hotfix for production that came from anywhere else. I started down the road with ryans update pack, but ran into problems post sysprep.Windows Update/Baseline Analyser etc can determine which service packs or hotfixes are needed. MS maintains the list. Why not use that and just use the data already provided. I parse through mssecure.xml (which is avail for download) It provides me a list of patches for effected product id and the download location. As a bonus it also provides info about the patch which I use to create dynamic patch documentation in html format.
narrative Posted July 23, 2005 Posted July 23, 2005 I have a wider definition of "idiots" but I prefer the term MORONS, it sounds even better in French! <{POST_SNAPBACK}>isn't "moron" in "french id***."
dirtwarrior Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 I was looking forward to testing, he did give himself about 6 months for this.
-= Mancubus =- Posted August 10, 2005 Posted August 10, 2005 Seems guy misinformed everyone. No single reply for already near month...
thetop Posted August 11, 2005 Posted August 11, 2005 Hmm... Oh well. Hopefully he didn't get discouraged.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now