Overall performance comparison between different computers under Windows XP

[NotHereToPlayGames]

Do you "need" for me to run the entire test again ???

I will.  But I myself see it as a "waste of time".

[AstroSkipper]

11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

And please take a step back.  It was YOU YOURSELF that said we needed to not base comparisons on CPU BENCHMARKS but use this "test suite" instead.

We can (and did, but you didn't believe their numbers) cite CPU comparisons strictly by visiting web sites that perform those comparisons.  No need to run a half hour test.

I think we're done here, agreed?  My Intel Atom is a PIECE OF SH#T.

You are somehow talking your head off here. You and only you were trying, statistically completely absurdly, to make a statement about how much faster my CPU is than yours from artificial, completely arbitrarily defined values. And by that I mean the CPU score, since you didn't offer detailed values. That is statistically and mathematically pure nonsense.  If you really want to know more about our CPUs in a more meaningful way, you have to compare the values in the section CPU Test Suite to get information how many times faster my CPU is than yours. So please be more serious when making statements! 

Edited September 8 by AstroSkipper
Update of content

[NotHereToPlayGames]

I kind of feel like you just always have to "win".  I'll post the ENTIRE results in 45 minutes or so.

Edited September 7 by NotHereToPlayGames

[UCyborg]

And then Adieu, Goodbye, Auf Wiedersehen for today?

I feel like you guys are making another bloated thread on MSFN. 5 pages already xD

Edited September 7 by UCyborg

[AstroSkipper]

4 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

I kind of feel like you just always have to "win".

No. What am I to win here? I already lost. As I already stated, your CPU is definitely weaker than mine. But how much weaker can only investigated if there are meaningful values. It can only be solved statistically and thus mathematically.

[NotHereToPlayGames]

Here is where those numbers were "arbitrarily obtained".  I did not pluck them out of my dog's butt, lol.

[AstroSkipper]

5 minutes ago, UCyborg said:

And then Adieu, Goodbye, Auf Wiedershen for today?

A small note. You probably meant rather "Auf Wiedersehen!". I’ll say then:

[AstroSkipper]

11 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Here is where those numbers were "arbitrarily obtained".  I did not pluck them out of my dog's butt, lol.

You are grabbing values from the System Test Suite. These values are not CPU-specific. That's what the CPU Test Suite is for.

[AstroSkipper]

3 hours ago, George King said:

@AstroSkipper I have just created WinRAR SFX Repack for 3DMark06. It installs silently and key is automatically added into registry. So you got full version without any additional steps.

 

https://mega.nz/file/c2UylCKB#aNtZJ2hIqniYJiLaL1wQNK6vbI6h1tgLwcopsLJyJXY

Thanks for the link! However, I never used 3DMark before as I am not a gamer. The graphics on my Windows XP computer is very weak anyways.

[AstroSkipper]

@NotHereToPlayGames BTW, here is the corrected link in the way uCyborg posted it: https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Pentium-4-280GHz-vs-Intel-Atom-N450/m3163vsm3190

[Saxon]

On 9/7/2024 at 3:01 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Not "only" Win7 Starter.

Mine is LEGIT AND LEGAL.  Not a "counterfeit".  And it came with XP pre-installed.  Maybe not in YOUR country, but that's not my problem, lol.

Google/Bing/Duck for "acer aspire one windows xp".  These XP models are all over the place.

I didn't say "only" about the whole series of that laptop, I said that precise config with N450. I looked in your country at Walmart, etc.

In my country they ceased to sell computers with XP in 2007.

 

[George King]

@AstroSkipper I just repacked PCMark05 aswell. Silent WinRAR SFX and of course with correct key too. 

 

https://mega.nz/file/42lWza4A#zBnBzJ6EFdOuefA5yWTzIwwtk6LaPbjhI2OdD9-nBdM

Edited September 8 by George King

[AstroSkipper]

11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Here is where those numbers were "arbitrarily obtained". 

 

11 hours ago, AstroSkipper said:

You and only you were trying, statistically completely absurdly, to make a statement about how much faster my CPU is than yours from artificial, completely arbitrarily defined values. And by that I mean the CPU score, since you didn't offer detailed values. That is statistically and mathematically pure nonsense. 

Just for clarification. Only the scores are completely arbitrarily defined values. You have to read more carefully what I write. And please don't mix everything up! 

Edited September 8 by AstroSkipper
Update of content

[NotHereToPlayGames]

Dead Horse.

[AstroSkipper]

27 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

Dead Horse.

The animal rights activists won't like that.