Diskeeper 8 is good, 9 is better. Definitely gets my vote.

I hate Diskeeper, froze my system the first time I used it. Anything that needs THAT much power to defrag was coded way wrong. Diskeeper walked down the wrong path IMHO.

I use Raxco's PerfectDisk 6

works fine. B)

sysinternals.com pagedefrag

I vote for diskeeper

I have used Perfectdisk 7 since 1 month, it seems good.

use winme defrag its more faster than win98 defrag... u wont regret ... man

My vote is with oo defrag.

I was fairly happy with the Windows 98 defrag utility until someone turned me on to the Windows ME defrag.exe. Its much faster and does a great job, plus it doesn't get stuck when your antivirus protection is on. Its 208 k.

This is a download link, not a webpage:

Download Link for Win ME defrag.exe

I am using PerfectDisk7. DK causes a crash when I am moving it in the background. And, that company is a miser. There is no discount in version up from DK8 to DK9.That company doesn't give it the notice of version up, either.As for the support, RAXCO is better.

My vote goes for PerfectDisk 7. Been using it since its release. I like it much better than 6.

o&o here

PerfectDisk v7.0, I liked the O&O v6.5 GUI better but did not like the hidden service it would run consuming memory, if I disable the service it fails to function, and O&O also had issues with the firewall.

PerfectDisk has "smart defrag" which defrags accoring to how often certain clusters are accessed, whereas O&O has STEALTH, SPACE, COMPLETE/ Name, COMPLETE/Date, COMPLETE/Access. My guess is COMPLETE/Acess would be equal to smart defrag.

hands down executive software's diskeeper series.

I will stay with DefragNT. the others that have been list are good don't really have a need for all the options right now.