LordGarfio Posted Friday at 02:41 PM Posted Friday at 02:41 PM 9 hours ago, anton12 said: LordGarfio said: "The PayPal captcha has also stopped working, it does not pass the verification despite being correct." Can you confirm that for the latest version of NM28 too ? Here (Germany) the PayPal sign in works well with NM28. But St52 (latest version) does not work because the PayPal captcha does not load - the old problem that still needs fixing. NewMoon v28.10.7a1 (32-bit)(2025-10-16) Build Serpent v52.9.0 (2025-10-08)(32-bit) Build The login was not the problem, the problems are the Captchas, some of which are used for login and confirmations, at least for me. By the way, your browser may show the following URL https://license.malcat.fr/?, because the two mentioned above cannot do it and all everything is correct in the URL https://malcat.fr/
anton12 Posted Friday at 11:25 PM Posted Friday at 11:25 PM LordGarfio said: "By the way, your browser may show the following URL https://license.malcat.fr/?, because the two mentioned above cannot do it and all everything is correct in the URL https://malcat.fr/" My NM28 Version: 28.10.7a1 (32-bit)(2025-10-16) that works with PayPal has the following URL: https://www.paypal.com/signin SHA1 Fingerprint 12:2E:F7:4B:EE:2D:15:15:4F:4E:DE:63:48:9F:DB:6C:A1:B4:A4:6D
roytam1 Posted Saturday at 01:36 AM Author Posted Saturday at 01:36 AM 10 hours ago, LordGarfio said: By the way, your browser may show the following URL https://license.malcat.fr/ this site uses await, which is filed in https://repo.palemoon.org/MoonchildProductions/UXP/issues/2229 3
anton12 Posted Saturday at 07:33 AM Posted Saturday at 07:33 AM (edited) LordGarfio said: "By the way, your browser may show the following URL https://license.malcat.fr/?, because the two mentioned above cannot do it and all everything is correct in the URL https://malcat.fr/" My NM28 Version: 28.10.7a1 (32-bit)(2025-10-16) that works with PayPal has the following URL: https://www.paypal.com/signin SHA1 Fingerprint 12:2E:F7:4B:EE:2D:15:15:4F:4E:DE:63:48:9F:DB:6C:A1:B4:A4:6D ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My Serpent 52.9.0 (2025-10-16)(32-bit) that does NOT work with PayPal because the PayPal captcha does NOT load (If PayPal worked had the captcha loaded is a different question.) has the following URL: https://www.paypal.com/signin?locale.x=de_DE SHA1 Fingerprint 12:2E:F7:4B:EE:2D:15:15:4F:4E:DE:63:48:9F:DB:6C:A1:B4:A4:6D Edited Saturday at 07:35 AM by anton12
LordGarfio Posted Saturday at 02:49 PM Posted Saturday at 02:49 PM 7 hours ago, anton12 said: LordGarfio said: "By the way, your browser may show the following URL https://license.malcat.fr/?, because the two mentioned above cannot do it and all everything is correct in the URL https://malcat.fr/" My NM28 Version: 28.10.7a1 (32-bit)(2025-10-16) that works with PayPal has the following URL: https://www.paypal.com/signin SHA1 Fingerprint 12:2E:F7:4B:EE:2D:15:15:4F:4E:DE:63:48:9F:DB:6C:A1:B4:A4:6D ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My Serpent 52.9.0 (2025-10-16)(32-bit) that does NOT work with PayPal because the PayPal captcha does NOT load (If PayPal worked had the captcha loaded is a different question.) has the following URL: https://www.paypal.com/signin?locale.x=de_DE SHA1 Fingerprint 12:2E:F7:4B:EE:2D:15:15:4F:4E:DE:63:48:9F:DB:6C:A1:B4:A4:6D I had already commented that you cannot get past the captcha: "We could not the security challenge" , despite passing validation (green tick). 1
Goodwin Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM On 11/28/2025 at 4:37 PM, roytam1 said: Notice roytam1 why are you ignoring my question? Link
roytam1 Posted yesterday at 08:18 AM Author Posted yesterday at 08:18 AM On 11/30/2025 at 12:08 AM, Goodwin said: roytam1 why are you ignoring my question? Link As I said before, if it is just target version problem, you can just lowering minimum version in xpi. They have their own decision about minimum version and lowering it may or may not work, so just test yourself.
NotHereToPlayGames Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago @roytam1 I believe that he is asking not about xpi min-ver issues, but rather his issues with video playback in Serpent. 1
roytam1 Posted 18 hours ago Author Posted 18 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: @roytam1 I believe that he is asking not about xpi min-ver issues, but rather his issues with video playback in Serpent. no clue, check for upstream if problem persists. (but remember, youtube pushes AV1 content which is too heavy for old machines.) Edited 18 hours ago by roytam1 2
Goodwin Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago (edited) 16 minutes ago, roytam1 said: check for upstream roytam1 the question is about changing speed and CPU utilization. And it's not even a question, it's a bug ! and it's very old. And you've been written about it many times, judging by the topic. this problem is not related to YouTube and AV1. This is about regular video on websites - h264. I will also suggest you a certain direction for fixing it. In Centaury browser (https://github.com/Feodor2/Centaury/releases) there is no problem with increasing CPU load. And this browser is also based on basilisk. Edited 16 hours ago by Goodwin
roytam1 Posted 4 hours ago Author Posted 4 hours ago 12 hours ago, Goodwin said: roytam1 the question is about changing speed and CPU utilization. And it's not even a question, it's a bug ! and it's very old. And you've been written about it many times, judging by the topic. this problem is not related to YouTube and AV1. This is about regular video on websites - h264. I will also suggest you a certain direction for fixing it. In Centaury browser (https://github.com/Feodor2/Centaury/releases) there is no problem with increasing CPU load. And this browser is also based on basilisk. if you think the problem exists in my browser, you may at least try bisecting when the problem starts occurring. without doing so, there is no way to find where the problem is. and BTW Centaury doesn't share same UXP engine as my builds so it is incomparable.
roytam1 Posted 49 minutes ago Author Posted 49 minutes ago (edited) Notice: seems need some more time on ironing out front-end (win11) related revs from upstream which hopefully can be done in xmas, but UXP related changes are in and hopefully new build (without those front-end changes) will be available this week. Edited 47 minutes ago by roytam1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now