msfntor Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 7 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Yikes! I only run these member-supplied "checks" in a VirtualBox and holy cow, thank goodness by the sounds of it. I have a "line of defense" in my everyday browsing that ALL of these member-supplied "checks" try to force me to run without - not gonna happen for me and my Host OS! Kind of like never opening an email if you don't know who the sender is, never click a link in an email from an unknown sender, et cetera. I'm living & safe after this experience, I had to log off and on, that's all. No big deal, rest assured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msfntor Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 (edited) 6 hours ago, D.Draker said: it's the only site that DETECTS the spinning disks "feature" on your favourite browser. No it detects nothing but (badly sometimes) version of checked browser, it RAPPORT vulnerabilities data from official Chrome Releases/versions, not from our checked browsers... not interesting. "For one, that only tracks "official Chromium", not Chromium Forks." And WHY it rapports: "It looks like you're using Chrome 79" on DCBrowser, please?.. 8 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: It's basically a nice "history". It basically only COUNTS how many "vulnerabilities" have been "fixed" with each Chromium Release and adds them all up dating back to the User Agent version it sees you on. It's nice "hype and propaganda" marketing to scare the masses into running the "latest-and-greatest". It is true ... if we seek the truth ... the truth will set you free. Edited March 30, 2023 by msfntor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 I doubt that "chromiumchecker" was the culprit, as it is ran by only four on-domain scripts and relies on no 3rd-party shenanigans. My proxy redirector only shows two connections, the actual web site and my localhost Proxomitron. Confirmed by uMatrix - There is only four on-domain scripts and "cve.js" in particular is the script that literally just COUNTS the "fixes" per Chromium version dating only back to v70. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msfntor Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 "chromiumchecker.com links to the following External Domains: ==>bundle.b8e52ea1e26ca5f5f1a0.js " - thanks to "Browser JSGuard"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 It's not technically "external". It is "inline" to the local domain. Default blocked - With on-domain scripts allowed but third-party scripts blocked (to me, "external" means it is fetched from a different domain, this script is not) - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msfntor Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 (edited) In the Console I see two errors rapported by Browser JSGuard extension (to search on your search engine rather, than directly on the Web Store...): "SyncMessage.js:243 [Deprecation] Synchronous XMLHttpRequest on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to the end user's experience. For more help, check https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/. bundle.b8e52ea….js:2 [Deprecation] 'window.webkitStorageInfo' is deprecated. Please use 'navigator.webkitTemporaryStorage' or 'navigator.webkitPersistentStorage' instead." Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT: a13b875….woff2:1 AND c1d7482….woff:1 Edited March 30, 2023 by msfntor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 30, 2023 Author Share Posted March 30, 2023 1 hour ago, msfntor said: Failed to load resource: net::ERR_BLOCKED_BY_CLIENT: a13b875….woff2:1 AND c1d7482….woff:1 These are simply FONTS that one of your extensions is blocking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosey Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 Definitely using protection. Originally used xp from start of 2002 until 2015 when Win10, in my mind a worthy xp successor came along. With Win10 Eol coming in 2025 I'll have to move on to Win11, knowing full well alot of the things I use now on Win10, don't work on Win11. The cycle continues. ~ Rosey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msfntor Posted March 30, 2023 Share Posted March 30, 2023 2 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: It's not technically "external". It is "inline" to the local domain. OK, thanks, but Browser JSGuard has these buttons only: *Hidden iframe(s) Redirections *UnAuthorized Redirections *Encoded JavaScript *External Domain Requests *Trackers - so this bundle js is found under External Domain Requests button in the GUI... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted March 31, 2023 Share Posted March 31, 2023 new chromium browser (everybody hates Mozilla ) and AI powered search engine https://www.tempest.com/browser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted March 31, 2023 Author Share Posted March 31, 2023 15 minutes ago, Milkinis said: new chromium browser (everybody hates Mozilla ) and AI powered search engine https://www.tempest.com/browser Will not install in Win7. Runs slightly slower than my default Win10 browser (GDIChromium v96). Haven't really looked into whether all of the "privacy" marketing is legit or just hype. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted April 1, 2023 Author Share Posted April 1, 2023 On 3/29/2023 at 8:00 AM, Anbima said: I have replaced the chrome.dll and will test it. I don't have to change anything else, do I? On 3/29/2023 at 8:37 AM, NotHereToPlayGames said: Nope, not if your only concern is rebased versus not-rebased. Have you verified if the rebase was causing the issues you were having with your other programs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anbima Posted April 1, 2023 Share Posted April 1, 2023 The problem has not occurred since then. I continue testing. I also have the feeling that 360Chrome is faster with this (not rebased) chrome.dll. Was the (new) chrome.dll only rebased or does this have other changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted April 1, 2023 Author Share Posted April 1, 2023 It has other changes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted April 1, 2023 Author Share Posted April 1, 2023 (edited) The not rebased will launch faster after a hibernate or reboot (first and only first launch, every consecutive launch is not affected). Web site rendering speed is not affected. Edited April 1, 2023 by NotHereToPlayGames Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now