darien95 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 I'm getting these errors when testing my still working ST3640323AS in TestDisk:The harddisk <640GB / 596 GiB> seems too small! <<220676 TB / 200704 TiB> Check the harddisk size: HD jumpers settings, BIOS detection... Warning: the current number of heads per cylinder is 229 but the correct value may be 128. You can use the Geometry menu to change this value. It's something to try if -some partitions are not found by testDisk -or the partition table can not be written because partitions overlapsWhat does this mean and is it related to this problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PrOdiGy1 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 snipis it related to this problem?in short, no. the failure being talked about in this thread has absolutely no symptoms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzy_3D Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 the failure being talked about in this thread has absolutely no symptoms.There is one.If you come home, and notice that you've bought a seagate drive, backup your data ASAP. Failure is imminent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie78 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 (edited) Hello,I have recently bought a ST31500341AS, P/N:9JU138-302, Firmware CC1H, "Product Of China". Up to now, no problems, but can you tell me if this drive may also be affected? Fortunately it is not Thailand-made, but what about drives produced in China? Are there any known cases of failures?This is what it looks like: Thanks alot. Edited January 16, 2009 by Jackie78 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruddrage Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 My new RMA drive has been dispatched and it's another 7200.11. I hope a firware fix is released before this one goes down the pan.And the word spreads The Register Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icefloe01 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 (edited) And the Lawyers get hungry...http://www.kbklawfirm.com/seagate/?gclid=C...CFQquGgodTUfunQ Edited January 16, 2009 by icefloe01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 (edited) And the word spreads The Register Sometimes I LOVE the English language and it's ability to express understatements:Users seem convinced, energetically so in some cases, that the incidence of such drive failures is far higher than the statistically low incidence of failures to be expected with any drive. And the Lawyers get hungry.....and impatient...jaclaz Edited January 16, 2009 by jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikesw Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 (edited) and techreport http://www.techreport.com/discussions.x/16232They say they have phone call in to them to get the scoop on the problem!!!Alot of websites like tomshardware and such are computer hardware review sites which get alot offree hardware to test out and compare against other competitiors. So I think seagate wouldn't wantto p*** them off! Since their opinion influences alot what the higher end computer geeks buy.I just posted to slashdot.org another tech website. We'll see if they post the story. Heres my seagate press release!Here's a story thats been brewing for awhile and although seagate and their tech support is ignoring the problem by deleting,locking seagate forum accounts etc to hide the problem it has now become a worldwide problem with seagate 7200.11 HDD failing one day when the BIOS doesn't recognize the drive. People have narrowed the problem down to a BSY flag and when they try to correct it by an RS232 port to the HDD, they clear it but get LBA 0GB then. It doesn't matter if in Raid, or non-raid either. Failure rates from 20-80%. SalvationData.com in China provide data recover tool that is moderately expensive which fixes this problem. People don't want to RMA their drive since if they do, others can look at their data Discussion and tech websites getting the latest story/gossip techsiteAlso people found a knowledge base article -- which seagate quickly deleted -- that lists the drives with the problem. See archive image of their webpage image The bugs seems to be with NCQ and flush so BSD Unix patches NCQ out patchAnd the lawyers are getting in the act The law which probably caused this ceo quits and employee layoff Since seagate ignored the problem and locked their accounts, people posted to techwebsites and also to wikipedia to get the word out. See the 7200.11 section and the footnotes to the discussion sites wikipedia. Now seagate issues shall live forever in posterity!! Have we gotten Seagates attention yet!!! Isn't the web great....? Edited January 16, 2009 by mikesw Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pichi Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 (edited) I have built an EEPROM programmer.The EEPROM memory is of 512K (4MBit).I will do a backup of EEPROM memory of the PCB. Then I can do all test over PCB without any problem. Half of the firmware is here.The problem can be a defective EEPROM, can you say your EEPROM number? (8 leads integrated circuit of the family 25XXX). Edited January 16, 2009 by pichi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerSnoezie Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 I have built an EEPROM programmer.The EEPROM memory is of 512K (4MBit).I will do a backup of EEPROM memory of the PCB. Then I can do all test over PCB without any problem. The mid of firmware is here.The problem can be a defective EEPROM, can you say your EEPROM number? (8 leads integrated circuit of the family 25XXX).Ehhhrr, what exactly do you want us to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradius2 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Press Ctrl+Z to get: T> command prompt.Then type this:T>/2 (Enter)2>S006b (Enter)2>R21,01 (Enter)2>C0,570 (Enter)2>W20,01 (Enter)Gradius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerSnoezie Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Press Ctrl+Z to get: T> command prompt.Then type this:T>/2 (Enter)2>S006b (Enter)2>R21,01 (Enter)2>C0,570 (Enter)2>W20,01 (Enter)GradiusYeah.. Care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradius2 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 The page you snapped from their site, does it mean that their going to get out a update/fix to all our failed drives or must the drive be unlocked from bsy mode until we can use it when its released.If your drive has bricked you won't be able to use the firmware update. So data recovery will still be our problem.. And if it's reset, by using a recovery kit or other means, I guess you can update it.As long your drive can be recognized by BIOS, you're safe.After that, you're just doomed and needs RMA.Gradius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradius2 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Yeah.. Care to elaborate?That is for those with RS232 interface connected to a Seagate with the so called BSY (busy) problem.Gradius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gradius2 Posted January 16, 2009 Share Posted January 16, 2009 Hello,i'm new here...brought to you via Google-Search...Well after many years of using only Seagate Drives, and only one failure...(and that drive went down after being 8 years in constant use...)my ST3500320AS, bought August 2008, went down 10 Jan 09...with the wellknown symptoms...PC works fine, I reboot, the drive is no longer recognised by the BIOS...I made a funny discovery though...I have a second ST3500320AS, which has the SD25 firmware...so I switched the PCBs, and the dead drive was recognised in the BIOS as ST3500320AS with SD25 firmware, i was happy, thought myself very lucky...but Windows,and any other OS btw, said "NO!!!"...and told me the drive has 0GB capacity...Now I am constantly observing the NET for solutions, because I wont give up my data on this Drive...Here are the specs for your list:9QM5HVYL:ST3500320AS:9BX154-303:SD15:09077:KRATSG:Aug08:10Jan09:D3m3nt0r:GermanyIt wont works because every PCB has an unique mapping to the specific HD, so the pcb is "married" with HD.Gradius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now