LLXX

I rename them all to Album_Artist_Title.mp3 and put them in the same directory.

Does this happen to all CHMs or just a few, or only one?

The hardware can still remap virtual addresses - to a different area of physical memory, or even to the swap file. FYI, all the processors since the 386 supported up to 256 terabytes of virtual memory via this mechanism. Indeed, there is fragmentation within the VM of each process, but since processes are not static, simply restarting them is enough to reorganise the virtual memory layout. Besides, if a process is doing enough alloc()s and free()s to fragment the virtual memory badly, whoever wrote the code is not paying attention to how memory allocation works. One way to force the DLLs to be contiguous within memory, if that's what you intended, is to rebase all of them that have relocs to the same address. That way the OS will almost always have to relocate them somewhere else, and they'll usually be loaded contiguously. ...and the word is contiguous. Google shows that nearly 2^10 sites have it spelt wrong

Someone should just tell those d*mn developers to stop using 2K and above -specific APIs. Why would they have wanted to anyway - it's not as if there's some revolutionary functionality there.

Well, the 975 chipset support in 98se is already flaky, so I wouldn't have expected any success either.

http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/Regmon.html http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/Filemon.html

@Jeremy, I tested the RAM modules both individually and together with same result: PASS. And I left it running for about 6-7 passes. No, leave it overnight......and the P4P800 seem to be quite reliable, and according to many other sources, good for overclocking.

The commands to do this exist as far I know... Should probably ask in the programming (and scripting) forum.

Also means the critical write times are longer and it's easier to mess something up if the power goes off halfway through a write. I don't know about you, but I've never had any problems with FAT32 besides the usual incorrect free space count and occasional partial blocks of clusters that were the result of a bad shutdown. It is possible to adjust the cluster size of FAT32 as well. 512-byte clusters can be used for drives up to 2 terabytes in size (2^9 * 2^32 = 2^41), if the average size of your files is that small. WinXP doesn't seem to like that for some reason though... maybe another artificial limitation like the format not wanting to make FAT32 partn's over 32Gb.

This is my guess too... firewalls especially don't like handling hundreds of connections at once.

The most definitive way is to see what address and where it was emailed from. (most of) the header information can be forged, but look up the IPs in the Recieved: lines since those can't be easily faked - example: I can send an email, and at the very top or the bottom of the Recieved list (can't remember which one, I think it was the top...) you'll find something like Recieved: from [xx.xx.xx.xx] by xx.xx.xx.xxWhere the first xx.xx.xx.xx is the IP of the machine that initially sent the mail, and the second is the IP of the first mail relay. I can insert my own Recieved: headers to disguise my IP as a mail relay, but my IP will still show up in the headers. In your case, you can check the IPs there to see if they seem logical - mails from M$ will always emerge from some M$-owned IP, and then go either into your ISP's mailserver or one of the mail relays of the internet main backbone. If you see any other IPs there then it's probably faked.

If you run RegMon while playing around with the settings in the Folder Options dialog, you'll find it's under HKLM or HKCU \Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Advanced\Folder It's obviously named... HideFileExt

7zip: All in 818Kb.Tugzip: Not bad, but nearly 4Mb.WinRAR: Not bad for 1010Kb, but not free.WinZIP: and 5.65Mb just for that, and not even free? My choice would definitely be between Tugzip and 7zip. Tugzip for more extensive support of the rarer formats, 7zip for its small size and portability. I lol'd at this: Just right-click, Open With... winzip.exe (or whatever other prog you want)...

Spawn a command shell with the delete command. http://www.developerfusion.co.uk/show/9/ ...may I ask why you want to do this?

They will return, if it is actually a virus that is causing this and yet unremoved, or he left out one item and that process basically reestablishes itself.

Here, try some of these DNS servers: 4.2.2.1 4.2.2.2 4.2.2.3 4.2.2.4

Some manufacturers now have a zero-dead-pixel policy, so you can return the monitor if you do find any. I find CRTs are too bright and have flicker, which my eyes hate. Not to mention the pixels are not perfectly square dots like they're supposed to be, but rather indistinct dots of light

NiCd and NiMH should be (almost) fully discharged before charging for maximum life. Lion batteries are supposed to be kept at nearly full capacity to prolong their lifespan, and charged often. So, the proper treatment depends what type of batteries it uses.

Would've worked with the older chipsets that didn't generate a lot of heat. Not a good idea for the newer ones.

That's a problem with your printer's paper feed alignment, not the software.M$ Word works fine, I can get accurate registration down to 1/100" on my laser printer, if careful (print a set of lines on one side, reinsert into the printer carefully and reprint - now see that the lines on each side are exactly on top of each other).

I think there is a DirectShow GIF codec that can make animated GIFs from a video stream, and also playback animated GIFs... at least I had one but have removed it since because I didn't need it.

Any description of the hardware you used? It can't go above 1Gb diretly? Have you tried increasing MaxPhysPage in small increments? Does MaxPhysPage=40001 work or immediately fail? Might be just something about the mobo/chipset memory controller's way of handling the memory addresses... as you've probably read, I was fine with 2Gb. This is (was) an i865 chipset. The filling of the DIMM slots might also have something to do with it...

I would advice against this practice. To avoid memory fragmentation? That is hardly a performance issue as the paging/protected virtual mode of the i386+ processors manages memory mapping in hardware. Besides, I'm quite sure there are hardcoded addresses in many of the DLLs, and some of them do not even have relocs and can't be loaded anywhere else without extensive editing. Basically, the performance gain (if any) from doing this is negligible.

ActiveMovie only accepts DirectShow filters for decoding the data.

I'm quite sure your hard drive is dying. Obviously your first priority is to make an image of the drive onto another drive, then run some diagnostics on the drive to determine if it really is dying. You should be able to recover data with any of the numerous free data recovery utilities: http://hddguru.com/content/en/software/ - for diagnostics http://www.pcinspector.de/file_recovery/UK/welcome.htm - one free file recovery utility