Saxon

"Is not just a bug, (Supermium) causes overflow in Operating system. it crashed and YouTube request relog 2 times (be careful). I completely uninstalled it (Supermium)" No answer from the Developer for almost a week. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1281 https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/buffer-overflow "Modern buffer overflow attacks often incorporate advanced obfuscation techniques to bypass detection and exploit vulnerabilities in real-time systems. Types of buffer overflow attacks. Techniques to exploit buffer overflow vulnerabilities vary based on the operating system (OS) and programming language." https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/definition/buffer-overflow

When someone writes too much in such manner, it's demagogy. The Supermium author already confessed it has nothing to do with DirectWrite. like you tried to insert/inject. "I developed a method to ensure that the "experimental" web feature support could be used only on specific sites, but I thought this would not be problem this early in 132 ESR's life. With that in mind, twitch.tv should be defaulted to use it, but other sites should be untouched, to avoid breaking other websites such as British Gas." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1279#issuecomment-2760133080 Why "experimental" web features are needed on the allegedly new engine, and as we saw with proof, Twitch works on Chrome 110 from 3 years ago, but you provide no proof.

Win32SS is a well known master of stubs/redirects. How else the Ex. Kernel works? I'm not saying he did it in this case, just to be clear. But that and/or similar sites are easy to fool with stubs.

As I stated above, the site rendering engine had to be left intact. It's what they do in other forks, only something that is missing is replaced, redirected. And Supermium already includes fixed DWrite.dll , so no reason to dig the sire rendering part. But I too think it's the old Chrome 109 (?) with the added new features to render some modern sites upon the old engine.

103 will most likely fail on Twitch due to the fact of being too old, it even predates the official cut off point for old OS like Windows 8. So it may fail due to the old engine and simply confuse us. Any other variants?

Age, my friend, age. The developer SHOULDN'T be fiddling with Chromium Code to begin with. Just port the code, as all other forks, including CatsXP and the recently ported Chrome 136, do.

Twitch is an important site many youngsters use this day. The developer is still somewhat young, I don't buy it for a second he didn't check out Twitch, before the releases came out, Second, @Dave-H, there already were several releases after you found the problem in v126, but the horse is still there, and the author even introduced an odd "fix", again with "experimental features" turned on for Twitch. @NotHereToPlayGames, probably, you missed. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1279#issuecomment-2760133080

@D.Draker, would YOU suggest to try this browser over Supermium? I've been looking for 32bit for ages!!!

Why?

SSD killing "feature".

Is this a Win98 or whatever OS used DirectX9 25 years ago? Everything starting Vista is d3d11 capable, you want to say - Supermium not capapble of d3d11?

Did that. and the browser still keeps to record the metrics on me.

Why is it created in the first place, even with the Ungoogled switch? Interesting procedure, but we can't observe 24/7 for it to not slip through with that sensitive information.

I disabled everything I could, and I use the Ungoogled switch.

Runs very good on the original Vista 32 bit (January 2007 ISO). Funny, it still says. "Chromium may not function correctly because it is no longer supported on Vista",

It can only tell one thing, your previous reports were successfully sent, mine are piling up.

Why do I have these folders/files prefixed "BrowserMetrics" in my Supermium Data folder? Even if I delete them - every time I run Supermium new folders and big files are created. How can I prevent these folders - or at least tell Supermium to delete them after it quits? BrowserMetrics files contain all vital info about me and my PC.

I should've been more specific. Supermium developer finally admitted he meddles with the default colour scheme and theme.

Supermium weird colour issues are finally admitted by the developer and allegedly fixed, at least some of them. "improved the context menu colour" https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases

In the 30 y.o. DEll 2407, the white colour is unpleasant to begin with, not to mention the jaw breaking tear and wear it suffered after all those decades of such extensive usage, I'm not surprised @NotHereToPlayGames doesn't see the clear difference in favour of Brave. https://www.dell.com/community/en/conversations/monitors/2407wfp-hc-or-maybe-2407wfpb-colour-problems/647e8e21f4ccf8a8de258ddb I understand Brave is more "dirty" with spying,

HERE, you wrote yourself.

Not only that, he made the whole browser light up like the X-mass tree. Look at the shadows near "about".

Or could be Windows 8 with a custom classic theme and colour scheme from Windows 7.

We don't lose hopes. Probably tagging @win32 won't hurt, either!

You can always dump Windows in favour of a Russian OS, oh wait a minute, no such thing exists.