BengalEmpire767

You know, this was a good idea, didn't work though. But just so a person reading this doesn't go back empty-handed, here you go, The Win32s compatibility list by Stephan Großklaß (now maintained by Gaby Chaudry): http://stephan.win31.de/w32slist.htm I'm pretty sure you can find Win32s (the Latest Version is 1.30) on the internet somewhere. WinWorld has a copy, if I am correct. win31.de has one as well

I would assume something like a few dozen or hundred people or the extremely few companies that rely on Windows 3.1 specific software use it. Then of course, there are the people who either feel nostalgic or think Windows 3.1 looks cool and keep a 386 or 486 box around. But, if I were to guess, most Windows 3.1 installs are on VMs.

Wait a minute, I just realized, it says "...because the site uses a security protocol which isn't enabled." Does that mean the protocol exists but is not enabled by default? Also I may have found your problem: https://github.com/rn10950/RetroZilla/issues/47

lol rekt

Windows 3.1 is NOT to be downloaded "legally". Abandonware literally means Abandoned software. I'm sure Microsoft won't be too happy if you ask them for a 'legal' download. The only legal way to get a copy of Microsoft Windows Version 3.10 is if you bought a retail copy from your local store back when it still was on shelves. Literally no one cares where a person gets their Win3.11 copy from nowadays, but I'm sorry, you can't get a legal copy, you couldn't get one for like, the last two decades, that's literally why it's abandonware. Edit: I just realized, I sound angry or mad or something, sorry for that.

I'm pretty sure you can't use other versions of DOS than the one bundled with Win9x when installing it. It may be because these versions of MS DOS are made to specifically work with Win9x and other DOS may not be configured in Windows's best interests (or should I say, Microsoft's best interests, yeah that was a thing back then, AARD code, if I'm correct.) Also, no MattKC didn't install 98 on FreeDOS, that was definitely MSDOS bundled and installed with 98. Have you tried making a partition in Fdisk? Also I wouldn't recommend making a partition larger than 2 GB (you really don't need even close to that amount, but ok)

Have you checked your date and time to make sure it's correct? Usually that causes problem with Https, that doesn't seem to be the case here (since you can access the site), but better to be safe than sorry.

me too. but the truth is, if it was implemented, there would be little difference (at least to the end user) between retrozilla and some actually functional browser that you would want to use, since sites like YouTube rely on HTML5 video and audio. it's sad :'( . but maybe one day, retrozilla will spring back into existence like never before and actually implement these things. rn10950 apparently did want to make a RetroZilla 3.0 based on an updated gecko tho. wonder how that would have looked like.

welcome and welcome to people who are welcome and those who are thanking everyone for saying welcome and just... welcome to everyone in general.

welcome... and good luck. you will need it. even while reading. some forum posts are insane++.

i wish i could do something about it. if only... some professional programmer randomly stumbled upon this post. but meh. that wont happen

i use notepad

Just Read this forum post and... wow just wow, you really do have to watch your mouth here to not fall into the abyss forever. but meh i guess it's over now.

oh cool, can you give a link? im sure everyone else would like using it... no promises tho.

this is the best tech support adventure ive ever seen yet, by far

none of the computers at my house support it due to cpu stuff, so i cant tell if it an upgrade or a downgrade. but just looking at it, it looks like it was designed by apple, so no.

https://github.com/rn10950/RetroZilla/issues/36 this is your issue probably, but if it isn't this then i have no idea

umm.... so i was browsing the internet a while ago, and i saw Retrozilla's long neglected front page (https://rn10950.github.io/RetroZillaWeb/) and was like, what if there was something so people like me can do something about it. Then I realized that Github allows you to fork people's stuff to unofficially update them and here I am now. I was wondering if anyone has some html (and probably css) knowledge and could help. (https://github.com/bengal-empire/RetroZillaWeb) Also about that... can you (if possible) use a VM or something to replicate this error? Like, from a fresh install of 95 or 98, to Installing Retrozilla to getting the error. If you could give instructions to replicate this issue, that would go a long way. Don't know from where, (probably the Github Issues page) but I think I heard that Retrozilla had language translation bugs, that could be the reason for the incorrectly displayed site. Also yeah, This is most likely a TLS/ site encryption issue, my best guess, probably has nothing to do with your text display problem, have you tried the TLS tweaks from the first page? Also, why is it red and blue and looking glitched? Is that a problem with the screenshot or does it look like that on your machine?

Best wishes to roytam1 from me too.