D.Draker

I don't know (and could care less who you are), but you are not allowed to curse on developer win32, so taking care of goats is indeed better for you, I agree.

dude, watch your language, you're supposed to be polite on the forum, respectful to developers' work. Don't like, don't use, or report issues politely. Take example from my posts.

Friend, it's a bit unfair to compare 86 to 121 version, but overall I agree with you, it could be less RAM hungry. Actually, I remember I liked 117 much better for the faster startup.

Maybe win32 meant to just open the browser, not to actually run it with 1 page. To me, the number of 768 is strange by itself. A standard DDR2 module is 2GB, a smaller one is 1GB, smallest DDR3 is 2GB. If by 768MB he meant 3x256Mb of SDRAM modules, they are ancient history from 2000.

Thanks, perhaps you missed, yesterday there was an investigation, in which a conclusion had been made, it's not really portable (it needs to place file/files into OS folder), but most importantly- it writes to ones registry. So not suitable as a portable suggestion for this topic. writes to registry https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259018 file in system32 folder https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/?do=findComment&comment=1259022

jaclaz, I can't add it to cart, can you? After I click on "add to cart", I see a blank white page with "https://www.brainzap.de/cart/ajax_add". I just wonder about the shipping price to the UK. Thank you. My browser is Opera 97 (Chrome 111).

Win32 aims at a much bigger crowd rather than us, such folks care about automatic updates, Googel sync, DRM, Nvidia "shield" or whatever ir's called. Just read what they order at the github's page. It's understandable, esp. if we consider the browser seem to follow a commercial route.

What's the level of your XP updates? What Service pack?

Welcome! Enjoy your stay.

Yeah, thanks, it's the free variant, perhaps that's why it doesn't work? https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/178#issuecomment-1913189598

This one can be safely ignored, in fact it's even advisable to disable crashpad completely, and looks like it's been disabled already, hence the message.

Did you try with or without the paid services?

Thank you very much, I'll upvote tomorrow, I'm outta likes.

Remote planetary distributions by the means of cosmic connections!

This is very confusing, is the browser portable, or not? Or only the installer is portable? Does it write to the registry, or not? Thanks for the answer.

Yes, thanks, I saw that, but what did he mean by "make user data portable", does the browser still create folders in the system, does it still write to the registry, or not?

I'd be more interested whether it's finally portable. With my brilliant English, I can't figure it out from the description. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v121

5 Euro seems very reasonable, I'd pay (if I had XP), it's basically a cup of coffee once in a month.

I'm afraid this one is too risky to try because of another chip on the board, we don't know how good the compatibility with XP will be, it's mostly for modern mobos' and/or laptop/notebook's low power PCI-E version. I used a similar one to extend it to a "normal" PCI-E, after I decided to try to run my old laptop with an external GPU (they produce them in several variants), it worked only at PCI-E v.1.1 speed, so I'm not sure it will fit Dave's goal. In theory looks good, though. EDIT: Just measure the space around the PCI-E, that USB stick is huge.

No need to buy costly boards with additional power sockets, they are mostly aimed at those who use HDD enclosures without their own PSU, like the small 2.5 ones.

Don't forget to use Scite as the most convenient editing tool.

There are, but you need to choose only the best ones, since their soldering isn't always good. The first image is with an additional power cable (the cap on the photo is simply a filter against spikes, it can be directly connected to a PSU via molex, the second photo is a simple extender.

Dave, sorry for the delay! I was only able to find. Silicon Image SiI 3512 SATALink Controller Driver v.1.3.64 for Windows XP, it's still older than yours. https://driverscollection.com/_4336253885718f2c231da2e7a7a/Download-SONY-VGN-BX675P-Silicon-Image-SiI-3512-SATALink-Controller-Driver-v.1.3.64-for-Windows-XP-free

Strange, why would Vista need that hack, Vista supports all modern certificates, in contrast to XP.

I'm watching the streaming version, it only has the simple, outdated by decades Dolby 5.1, probably it would have more depth and atmosphere with DTS 7.1. Some good ideas are surely present in the film, some scenes could be shorter (too soapy).