Jump to content

Leokids123

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Brazil

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Leokids123

  1. Leokids123
    You won't get 3D on NT 4.0 using Virtualization software cause developers haven't done that...if you need 3D,then use 86box or PCem...
  2. Leokids123
    I'm actually trying it in Virtualbox 7.2.6.
  3. Leokids123
    Guest Additions can help you get working graphics,if that's what you mean by working graphics....
  4. Leokids123
    It did work actually. I just prefer 0.8.6d since 0.8.6i defaults to skinned GUI which froze VLC...instead of using wxwidgets.
  5. Leokids123
    Tested and no,it requires SHGetFolderPathW which isn't compatible with NT 4.0. If you got it working,then did you use a patch?
  6. Leokids123
    I'll test to see if you're true...
  7. Leokids123
    At least i put in the right month. Also,go place your games in the trash,if you had one!
  8. Leokids123
    Too focused on the UXP supposed improvements that you literally forgot about Retrozilla 2.3 eh?!
  9. Leokids123
    I'm testing YT2009 with my patched Flash 9.0.289.0 and it works...but had to enable flash player since it lacked HTML5 video of some sort...
  10. Leokids123
    I'll touch this again and I'll say i got a new VM for NT 4.0,so i will be testing some new games...
  11. Leokids123
    Whoever made these changes should have been reverted due to what it resulted into...
  12. Leokids123
    I've got my NT 4.0 VM back and...you can suggest anything now...
  13. Leokids123
    I wonder what's next...try to update your fork of Retrozilla to 2.3? Update cert store or ciphers to the latest in all browsers?
  14. Leokids123
    Oh..i see...But have you even tested to see if it hurts perfomance? Benchmarks is fine...?
  15. Leokids123
    Wait...aren't "performance improvements" intended to improve performance...?
  16. Leokids123
    It's an edge case caused by Cloudfare failing to verify UXP browsers.... It does feel like Cloudfare hates UXP browsers due to them being based on 52ESR and being underestimated in its modern capabilities... Even if the reality is different...
  17. Leokids123
    I can see... Thanks, @basilisk-dev!
  18. Leokids123
    Wait,Nested CSS is here?!
  19. Leokids123
    Yeah but both XP and 2000 were NT 5.x Also,NT 5.1 without service packs can only use browsers meant for 2000,not XP,these XP browsers require at least XP SP2-SP3...
  20. Leokids123
    Okay. But why say it's now ancient history?
  21. Leokids123
    Yep... Your browser's one of the niche browsers who supports such systems... In the future,since you're experimenting with old systems,maybe one day,you might attempt older OSes of Windows! Haha... Yeah,but when i say FINOSS i mean more like their actions or demeanor... Yeah...but why?
  22. Leokids123
    What about the fact you forgot about your fork of Retrozilla?
  23. Leokids123

    Where's Retrozilla 2.3 changes?

  24. Leokids123
    @roytam1 Willing to merge changes from 2.3 to your branch?
  25. Leokids123
    I meant that the team behind Pale Moon hated you and uses their own license to shutdown you... You don't remember what happened with the original Mypal?
×
×
  • Create New...