Jump to content

Leokids123

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    192

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Brazil

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Leokids123

  1. Leokids123
    Yeah...there are many OSes and platforms that to this day,they may or not have touched... DOS (Archanne provides a modern build with modern TLS but...) Windows 1.x and 2.x (wait...?) Windows 3.x (we're stuck at IE5 16-bit,Netscape 4.08 16-bit and Opera 3.63...and its win32s counterpart doesn't have much browsers) Windows NT 3.x (Retrozilla cover this one) Windows 9x (Retrozilla too covers it) Windows NT 4.0 (Retrozilla too covers this one,i've tested this before) Windows 2000 (uhh...New Moon 26 covers this one but i don't know...) Windows XP RTM-SP1 (Not many...but you can argue they can use the same browsers as 2000) Windows XP SP2-SP3 (widely supported) Windows Server 2003 (well,who knows?) Windows Vista (XP Browsers supports it,also supports r3fox...) Windows Server 2008 (same situation as vista,last 32 bit version for servers,wonder if server 2008 is extinction for 32-bit servers?) Windows 7 (unlikely,but many except Firefox for ESR stopped supporting it...) Windows Server 2008 R2 (same situation as Windows 7,but who uses this server OS?) Windows 8.x (Same situation as 7 but 8.x isn't widely used...so support seems to depend on Windows 7) Windows Server 2012 R1/R2 (same situation as 7 and 8.x) Windows 10 (unlikely,every major browser still supports it) Various versions of Windows Server based on Windows 10,Windows Server 2016,2019 and 2022 (same situation as Windows 10,although also unlikely) Windows 11 (unlikely,supported by Microsoft) Windows Server 2025 (same situation as 11) Linux GTK2 (this really needs one,but certain niche browsers do support it) Linux GTK3 (widely supported,the base for every browser these days) Mac OS 68k (No modern browser that even supports it) Mac OS PowerPC (We had Classila for Mac OS 9 but it ended support,someone! Take it over quickly!) Mac OS X PowerPC (so many browsers that's hard to count,Basilisk recently took this opportunity.) Mac OS X Intel (Unlikely,but this depends on the version. some are supported by forks,and most browsers these days require at least 10.15,which is supported by Intel) Mac OS X M1 (unlikely,too new,most already support this processor.) Other OSes? I don't know...
  2. Leokids123
    Yeah... I'd call this kind of situation FINOSS,which means Free Is Not Open Source Software...
  3. Leokids123
    Because that is true... Have you heard or forgotten that this guy's fork of Pale Moon got shutdown cause someone abused their license to claim it broke the license and shut it down?
  4. Leokids123
    Same guy who "hates" me is the same guy who has to answer my question...
  5. Leokids123
    Thanks. I only brought it up cause he was the same person who forced Pale Moon to stop development of MyPal,claiming he broke his license due to not publicly sharing its source code,not even in a branch,just a zip file... Feodor2 had to instead adapt Firefox Quantum which is a more difficult job than something like...UXP i think?
  6. Leokids123
    Well well well If it isn't Feodor2 who's hated by Pale Moon...?
  7. Leokids123
    Yep... Do you plan on supporting CSS Nesting,something scratch somehow requires but UXP doesn't require?
  8. Leokids123
    I get it. I view the lack of DRM as a bug,not a feature,but i get why you view it as a feature. And WebExtensions? Sure but... I do think you should focus on web compatibility rather than focusing on what Pale Moon is doing,it would be bad to prioritize AVX instead of web compatibility,as it'll break support for most CPUs and Chrome/Firefox whose latter Pale Moon was forked with supported SSE2 and SSE3,something Pale Moon stopped supporting,except for its 32 bits build... They don't care if they use a certain feature,all they care is that it's broken,CSS nesting should have been implemented regardless of if it's draft or not...
  9. Leokids123
    Yep! Considering web compatibility is key to you,you might one day enable Widevine DRM to enable watching protected media,even if it's 480p and not HD...when Pale Moon does not... While WebExtensions isn't planned,do you wanna implement that one day?
  10. Leokids123
    This is specifically about Scratch,cause for some reason they implemented CSS Nesting,which isn't implemented by Firefox before 115esr or 117 (by default) and Chrome before 109 or 112 by default. They claim to support browsers of the past three years...so if that's the case they shouldn't be using that...unless you enable it yourself?
  11. Leokids123
    Any but i'm thinking about Windows. Although Linux is okay. Speaking about some website is broken under Pale Moon and currently Basilisk,have you implemented a polyfill to fix CSS Nesting?
  12. Leokids123
    Any,but i was talking about Windows,although Linux is Fine.
  13. Leokids123
    How about IA32 or even SSE support? And how about 10.6 32-bit?
  14. Leokids123
    I've upgraded to Windows 2000 SP4,so this will for now,i'll not touch it...
  15. Leokids123
    I've tested Brincando com Arie and Adventure Quest and both worked... I wonder if it's because they're AVM1 or don't use features required in Flash 10 or later? Adventure Quest tells me i'm running 9.0.289.0,that it requires 8.0 and up,and its game engine version is 46.52,but... Most games made by Artix that relies on Flash works fine and some just either get infinite loop or just explicitly say it's not supported under 9.0.289.0...
  16. Leokids123
    I've just come to conclusion that 8.5.1 is the last for 95/NT 4.0 and Shockwave 10 (9 is just 8.5.1) isn't compatible with NT 4.0
  17. Leokids123
    Speaking about it Club Penguin Atake worked on my vm and i've tested the Naruto (Japan) website and apparently the mini AD built on Flash actually worked... I tested it again and it somehow works. Don't tell Boo about it,he hates flash on NT 4.0
  18. Leokids123
    Yep,the fork of 48.0.2 might be unnecessary but i've wanted to one day maintain it... https://github.com/LeoKids/Yansu You can fork it and merge changes to it...
  19. Leokids123
    Speaking about forks,Yansu has been made,and it's a fork of the last version for non-SSE2 PCs,Firefox 48. This might be irrelevant due to 45esr getting forked and Serpent IA32 exists but 48.0 seems forgotten by developers...even those who forks... Maybe @roytam1 can fork it and add his own changes to it.
  20. Leokids123
    That's more likely,my Intel processor didn't cause any problems with the NT 4.0 VM...
  21. Leokids123
    Besides,it should be noted that my Windows language is english,not polish,And this might be why it didn't work on his...
  22. Leokids123
    At least i have a CPU with SSE support,so i can run it. And i don't think SSE is the issue here,it could be the language...
  23. Leokids123
    I use English,and it well,it doesn't crash for me.
  24. Leokids123
    That's because it's the same thing as SP6 except revised,but can you check the winver? If it says Service Pack 6a instead of the Revised one,then you must get english one,That one worked for me...
  25. Leokids123
    https://archive.org/download/WinNT40SP6aISOEXE/sp6ai386.exe
×
×
  • Create New...