Jump to content

Leokids123

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    105

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Brazil

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Leokids123

  1. Leokids123
    Celeron Sandy Bridge got sse4.1/4.2 and....allows you to run pcsx2....
  2. Leokids123
    What they say they did it is the reason why they did it. Modern processors these days support AVX,so that'll not be a problem. The problem is when you have a Celeron,Pentium and even Atom,that typically never supported AVX except in latest gens. Heck,they even dropped support for "ancient" or "museum-grade" processors like Pentium 3,AMD Athlon XP and other processors not supporting SSE2,limiting them to SSE2 processors,for a similar reason. The same thing happened this year.
  3. Leokids123
    Well,Firefox has a check which prevents you from installing it on non-sse2 PCs. If you try to bypass it,it'll will work but it'll be unstable and might crash. Why not Pale Moon?
  4. Leokids123
    Have you tried to bypass the check or try to run it manually on incapable CPUs? I tried it on a Pentium 3 system running Windows 7,named VM8 on CollabVM with Firefox 115esr and it seemingly worked well,except being obviously slow and the instability,It's more bearable,even with 2GB,cause it ain't even using higher ram than expected,only when using Youtube. Even Youtube seemingly is so smooth,the drop of frames is barely noticeable,only when looking at the stats for nerds that you can see it drop frames. I know of the consequences,the instability and the possibility of it crashing or memory leak. But so far that time,i didn't see anything unstable there.
  5. Leokids123
    Its time for them to move to Chromium or Firefox if they don't want to deal with the slowness caused by AVX requirement in Pale Moon. Also, Basilik is safe.
  6. Leokids123
    Can you disable it anyways? It's unnecessary for MIPS. Also,i can't find bug 151066 anywhere,can you link it to me? Also, did you forget your retrozilla fork Crescent Vine? There are pull requests that should have merged but for some reason sincr october you never did...
  7. Leokids123
    Will you do a VC4 build for MIPS Retrozilla?
  8. Leokids123
    Speaking of NT 4.0,where's Retrozilla for NT 4.0 MIPS?
  9. Leokids123
    @Nicholas McAnespy
  10. Leokids123
    I wonder.... If you still need some help,here's how you find Geforce Go 7 drivers... First,go to Nvidia's drivers website Then select "Geforce" Then you select Geforce Go 7 Series (Notebooks) You can choose any product you may want.... Then choose any OS,i'll chose Windows XP for this. Then find it. This is Geforce Release 179 for notebooks,You can use that if it's compatible. I wonder if there's any 9x drivers,though?
  11. Leokids123
    He said he plans to update legacy browsers with a build,so we'll see by then.... I'm trying to be polite....
  12. Leokids123
    Don't you always do browser builds every week every time there's a change to the source code? I'm only just ordering cause you always build every week.
  13. Leokids123
    Well,do it next week as always,got it?
  14. Leokids123
    So you'll merge my pull requests and do a build of retrozilla again?
  15. Leokids123
    No retrozilla builds? You also forgot to merge my pull requests.
  16. Leokids123
    I dreamed about you finally doing the retrozilla build with my pull requests and you didn't bother to do it at all. What's up with that?
  17. Leokids123
    I have made the same thing i did for Retrozilla to classila,so can you just merge the pull requests? And you should have built the builds for new commits,look,I contributed to your fork and you don't always do that.
  18. Leokids123
    You ignored me about building about retrozilla's new build. And you have to merge Classilla and even Retrozilla changes into your branch, since you just refused to.
  19. Leokids123
    The suites are unchanged but the web browsing is now less annoying,I can't exactly test it yet but @roytam1 must test and share the build,instead of cowardly not building it in the last weekly build.
  20. Leokids123
    You forgot to put Retrozilla build in this month. I made changes to it and i wanna see if others aren't annoyed anymore.
  21. Leokids123
    It's for consistency with other pref names that are just named SSL3,doesn't need much explanation.
  22. Leokids123
    @roytam1 Should look at his fork that i made some pull requests improving Retrozilla,to make SSL suite preferences more consistent and make web browsing less annoying,the same thing @Nicholas McAnespy did with his fork,I'd call him ClassicNick but he's phasing out that name for no reason.
  23. Leokids123
    I contributed to the source code of Roytam1's fork and i just thought to make the suites more consistent and make web browsing less annoying,like @Nicholas McAnespy did with his fork.
  24. Leokids123
    The last time it received new tricks was in late 2000s,with SP3,and ended support since 2010s,in 2014.
  25. Leokids123
    Why cancel it?
×
×
  • Create New...