Jump to content

Leokids123

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    186

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Brazil

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Leokids123

  1. Leokids123
    At least i put in the right month. Also,go place your games in the trash,if you had one!
  2. Leokids123
    Too focused on the UXP supposed improvements that you literally forgot about Retrozilla 2.3 eh?!
  3. Leokids123
    I'm testing YT2009 with my patched Flash 9.0.289.0 and it works...but had to enable flash player since it lacked HTML5 video of some sort...
  4. Leokids123
    I'll touch this again and I'll say i got a new VM for NT 4.0,so i will be testing some new games...
  5. Leokids123
    Whoever made these changes should have been reverted due to what it resulted into...
  6. Leokids123
    I've got my NT 4.0 VM back and...you can suggest anything now...
  7. Leokids123
    I wonder what's next...try to update your fork of Retrozilla to 2.3? Update cert store or ciphers to the latest in all browsers?
  8. Leokids123
    Oh..i see...But have you even tested to see if it hurts perfomance? Benchmarks is fine...?
  9. Leokids123
    Wait...aren't "performance improvements" intended to improve performance...?
  10. Leokids123
    It's an edge case caused by Cloudfare failing to verify UXP browsers.... It does feel like Cloudfare hates UXP browsers due to them being based on 52ESR and being underestimated in its modern capabilities... Even if the reality is different...
  11. Leokids123
    I can see... Thanks, @basilisk-dev!
  12. Leokids123
    Wait,Nested CSS is here?!
  13. Leokids123
    Yeah but both XP and 2000 were NT 5.x Also,NT 5.1 without service packs can only use browsers meant for 2000,not XP,these XP browsers require at least XP SP2-SP3...
  14. Leokids123
    Okay. But why say it's now ancient history?
  15. Leokids123
    Yep... Your browser's one of the niche browsers who supports such systems... In the future,since you're experimenting with old systems,maybe one day,you might attempt older OSes of Windows! Haha... Yeah,but when i say FINOSS i mean more like their actions or demeanor... Yeah...but why?
  16. Leokids123
    What about the fact you forgot about your fork of Retrozilla?
  17. Leokids123

    Where's Retrozilla 2.3 changes?

  18. Leokids123
    @roytam1 Willing to merge changes from 2.3 to your branch?
  19. Leokids123
    I meant that the team behind Pale Moon hated you and uses their own license to shutdown you... You don't remember what happened with the original Mypal?
  20. Leokids123
    Yeah...there are many OSes and platforms that to this day,they may or not have touched... DOS (Archanne provides a modern build with modern TLS but...) Windows 1.x and 2.x (wait...?) Windows 3.x (we're stuck at IE5 16-bit,Netscape 4.08 16-bit and Opera 3.63...and its win32s counterpart doesn't have much browsers) Windows NT 3.x (Retrozilla cover this one) Windows 9x (Retrozilla too covers it) Windows NT 4.0 (Retrozilla too covers this one,i've tested this before) Windows 2000 (uhh...New Moon 26 covers this one but i don't know...) Windows XP RTM-SP1 (Not many...but you can argue they can use the same browsers as 2000) Windows XP SP2-SP3 (widely supported) Windows Server 2003 (well,who knows?) Windows Vista (XP Browsers supports it,also supports r3fox...) Windows Server 2008 (same situation as vista,last 32 bit version for servers,wonder if server 2008 is extinction for 32-bit servers?) Windows 7 (unlikely,but many except Firefox for ESR stopped supporting it...) Windows Server 2008 R2 (same situation as Windows 7,but who uses this server OS?) Windows 8.x (Same situation as 7 but 8.x isn't widely used...so support seems to depend on Windows 7) Windows Server 2012 R1/R2 (same situation as 7 and 8.x) Windows 10 (unlikely,every major browser still supports it) Various versions of Windows Server based on Windows 10,Windows Server 2016,2019 and 2022 (same situation as Windows 10,although also unlikely) Windows 11 (unlikely,supported by Microsoft) Windows Server 2025 (same situation as 11) Linux GTK2 (this really needs one,but certain niche browsers do support it) Linux GTK3 (widely supported,the base for every browser these days) Mac OS 68k (No modern browser that even supports it) Mac OS PowerPC (We had Classila for Mac OS 9 but it ended support,someone! Take it over quickly!) Mac OS X PowerPC (so many browsers that's hard to count,Basilisk recently took this opportunity.) Mac OS X Intel (Unlikely,but this depends on the version. some are supported by forks,and most browsers these days require at least 10.15,which is supported by Intel) Mac OS X M1 (unlikely,too new,most already support this processor.) Other OSes? I don't know...
  21. Leokids123
    Yeah... I'd call this kind of situation FINOSS,which means Free Is Not Open Source Software...
  22. Leokids123
    Because that is true... Have you heard or forgotten that this guy's fork of Pale Moon got shutdown cause someone abused their license to claim it broke the license and shut it down?
  23. Leokids123
    Same guy who "hates" me is the same guy who has to answer my question...
  24. Leokids123
    Thanks. I only brought it up cause he was the same person who forced Pale Moon to stop development of MyPal,claiming he broke his license due to not publicly sharing its source code,not even in a branch,just a zip file... Feodor2 had to instead adapt Firefox Quantum which is a more difficult job than something like...UXP i think?
  25. Leokids123
    Well well well If it isn't Feodor2 who's hated by Pale Moon...?
×
×
  • Create New...