Jump to content

Leokids123

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    109

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    Brazil

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Leokids123

  1. Leokids123
    I'm assuming "modern" Javascript is ES6+ Those versions of Javascript are fairly recent and supports modern features.
  2. Leokids123
    Anubis,the clunky piece of software developed by non-conformant browser-hating people protects those kind of websites to avoid AI crawling.
  3. Leokids123
    He needs help with Chatzilla and he just manually fixed it and...
  4. Leokids123
    I might put up an annoucement Retrozilla 2.3 has been released,so @roytam1,do you plan to update retrozilla and talk about updating it to 2.3?
  5. Leokids123
    Any news?
  6. Leokids123
    Google search no longer works,it is blank when you try to search...
  7. Leokids123
    ... Does those count as you saying that? Not directly,but i'm assuming you basically saying that it'll always work.
  8. Leokids123
    I'm still skeptical of you,but i'll just say something Just because the default configuration works for you,doesn't mean it will always work.
  9. Leokids123
    https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/addressing-merge-conflicts/resolving-a-merge-conflict-on-github
  10. Leokids123
    Oh you're back. As for the retrozilla fork,are you gonna merge the nss pull request? And did you know someone went ahead and started to merge pull requests?
  11. Leokids123
    I didn't mean r3dFox,I mean something like a 115esr fork for continued Windows 7 and 8.1 support.
  12. Leokids123
    I wish you took your time and make changes to Retrozilla to support modern web,but at this point it's mostly the creator's doing. As for Windows 7 and 8.1 users,if 115esr ends support,will you fork 115esr and update it? Also another question,Do you plan to fork Firefox 12 (last release of firefox for 2000 and XP RTM-SP1 users) and upgrade the NSS library to the one compatible with the modern web?
  13. Leokids123
    Finally,he's not dead! He's merging PRs and reverting some!
  14. Leokids123
    Hmm... @roytam1,have you even thought of making a vc4 build of Retrozilla? This can help PowerPC,MIPS,and other architectures nt 4.0 is avaliable for,except maybe Alpha.
  15. Leokids123
    Once UXP gets closer to 128esr,We'll probably see Serpent being like "OMG i can now use scratch 3.0 without debug being glitched and tutorials crashing" Same with Pale Moon or even Basilik but....considering Basilik been making releases before Pale Moon could, we'll see that browser get scratch to get newly released features from past year to work. But not 115esr,will remain buggy with scratch new features which is up to them to fix it... cause its esr and it'll only have security updates.
  16. Leokids123

    Where's Crescent-Vine's NSS changes from Roytam1?

    1. Leokids123

      Leokids123

      @Nicholas McAnespy @roytam1

  17. Leokids123
    I mean,make a separate build for arch:sse build,not default build. You understood it wrong. Serpent IA32 works well but should have been faster if built with SSE,that'll help Pentium 3 and Athlon XP.
  18. Leokids123
    If you make a arch:sse x86 build for Serpent,it could make serpent much faster...
  19. Leokids123
    If you're gonna stream,you should just use Netflix,if you have a subscription.
  20. Leokids123
    Actually,such graphic cards should work,although no AERO will be supported. I don't think this boy is talking about AERO.
  21. Leokids123
    Try 81.98 though.
  22. Leokids123
    Found some new Apps that should work on NT 4.0,but i haven't tested though. I'm still looking for apps that work with NT 4.0!
  23. Leokids123
    BUMP,cause i'm still looking for the last/latest version of programs for NT 4.0
  24. Leokids123
    Oh great, @basilisk-dev got their post taken down......
  25. Leokids123
    I agree with you,Moonchild dropped support so early for non-sse2 hardware due to the fact they won't let people run Pale Moon on museum-grade systems,while Mozilla would support it as long as possible,which by 2016-2017,they dropped support for non-SSE2 hardware,starting with 48.0.2 for Windows and 52.0/52esr for Linux,and dropped by 49.0 on Windows and 53.0 for Linux. For linux is different story,if you run on Debian or any Linux Distro based on Debian,like Ubuntu,you know you can use 128esr on non-SSE2 systems. Thanks @roytam1,modern browsing on XP,Vista, and non-sse2 systems wouldn't be possible without you. And thanks Moonchild and your group of devs for making UXP and improving modern web compability while keeping support for XUL and NPAPI.......
×
×
  • Create New...