NotHereToPlayGames

One already exists. It's called PROXOMITRON. I've been using it since 2004! and it STILL WORKS - including the ability to spoof CLIENT HINTS !!! Technically, the version all of us Proxo (as we call it for short) users use now has been recompiled and rebranded as "Proxomitron Reborn". It is NOT that difficult to LEARN. If you REALLY want a CH Spoofer, then please provide me (publicly or via PM) with a web site that is denying login based on Client Hints - I have personally yet to witness one in real life (only banners about outdated browser). And I will personally walk you through step by step on how PROXOMITRON will SPOOF those CLIENT HINTS to regain loginability (if loginability is even a word, don't care if it isn't, lol).

Agreed! I see ZERO justification to run 360Chrome/Thorium/Supermium on any of my Win10 machines. I also used to make the mistake of thinking that running an x86 program on an x64 machine was a good idea - IT ISN'T nowadays, there used to be some benefit several years ago, but not really the case nowadays.

"last"

That's where you are wrong. Period.

Et tu, Brute? This request is not that uncommon here at MSFN - and it grows quite tiresome, to be honest. It's called MICRO-MANAGING and nobody likes to be micro-managed. SNIPPETS are just fine. People following the conversation can follow just fine. Another way to look at "this" - there are two kinds of people here at MSFN... 1) glass half full... 2) glass half empty... Running around telling people HOW to "quote" is the "half full" folks thinking ALL of MSFN should be "half full" folks and TELLING THE "HALF EMPTY" HOW TO ACT, HOW TO CONFORM TO THE "HALF FULL" WAY OF LIFE. Or would it be the "half empty" folks thinking they can covert ALL of the the "half full" folks? Or something like that... Akin to an upset wife and the husband telling her HOW to FEEL - "good luck with that", lol.

Bingo! We are on the same page! If you see these as a privacy issue, then you see the web site owner as collecting data on their visitors and that you see them using the ClientHint UA as one-of-many data points. Those data points are "collected" and "logged" then "sorted" by the web site owner that uses all of this data to tell them something about their visitors. By creating a ClientHint UA where The space between the brackets is empty in mine, as only one example, there may be 10,000 visitors to this web site and you will be the ONLY visitor with that space between the brackets. You stand out like a sore thumb. You are truly UNIQUE. What you really should be doing (it's what I do using Proxomitron) is telling that web site owner that you are running Win11 when in fact you are running Win10 or WinXP or Vista. If that web site has ONLY ONE visitor visiting via Vista, you stand out like a sore thumb. Same goes for if you leave that field blank, it's still a UNIQUE entry that NOBODY ELSE ON THE PLANET will have. Blend in with all of the Win11 crowd. Needle in a haystack that way.

That's not what I was asking. Why do you see ClientHints as "evil and must be done away with"? I have to assume that you see them as some form of "privacy issue", that ClientHints themselves FINGERPRINT the web site visitor, is that correct?

I'll answer that. But first, can you answer why you are jumping through all of these hoops to deactivate/disable/defuse "client hints"?

Where do you see evidence of this? Perhaps a different topic should be started. If it were a few others derailing this thread, the "Birds of a Feather" would be shouting off-topic and liking each other's post telling other members to stay on topic.

You should take serious consideration to the fact that you just created a UNIQUE fingerprint. If you want to stand out like a sore thumb, you succeeded. If your intention is to blend in with the crowd, then you should actually send the most popular field content.

I like Thorium also. I've had good success with it on my two remaining XP machines. My XP machines really hate UXP-based browsers (Serpent 52 and New Moon 28) for some reason. Major memory leaks. Very slow and sluggish. Too many unresolved bugs that keep piling up on top of each other. Not enough WEEKLY bug testers so a bug isn't found for SEVERAL MONTHS and nobody can pin down precisely when the bug first appeared.

Oh... I recall at least as high as 13.5.2044. Probably even "newer". So a 13.5.1039 does exist. Our corporate IT department was always blind to all of my builds as far as telemetry traffic. Something exists in 2044 that flagged IT. I didn't bother to isolate the specifics as I prefer 1030.

Here, I'll fix it for you... US entities must comply with US (rather than Russian, Canadian, or Sharia) law. Simply how US law works. waka waka waka

I'll have to try the imgur from home. I no longer keep 360Chrome here at work. As for 13.5.1039, I'm not familiar with it. I use 13.5.1030. There are "newer" versions but in the case of 360Chrome with the v86 Chrome engine, "newer is simply not better", stick with the OLDER.

Can I get an exact imgur link? Everything I've visited to try to track down your issue doesn't even have the same .js files you cited in your log.

Your problem is this line -- .split(...).at is not a function

All true. Though I myself wouldn't label the developer a "current" member - when has he last logged in? edit - I see he logged in four days ago, so yeah, that is "current" - but I see no posts from him in this thread. I suspect he PMs more than he posts.

But I also reiterate - it really is my opinion that Microsoft should just IGNORE such a TINY userbase. Why spend "thousands" in resources just to hunt down a small handful of users and "shut 'em down" when that userbase really poses NOTHING to the "bottom line"?

It kind of doesn't work that way. GitHub is located in the USA. GitHub cannot host content that violates USA Law. Is there a GitHub-like platform in Canada or Australia? If so, solution sounds pretty simple to me, move it to that platform. I know I'm a simple mind, but it really does sound that simple to me.

But I guess at the same time, I have to also look at the CROWDSTRIKE issue that took out the airline industry a week or so ago. Some blame MICROSOFT for that instead of CROWDSTRIKE. So MICROSOFT does have to "defend" its code if an attack even on MODIFIED CODE by "third paries" affects MICROSOFT'S "reputation".

Not to be misread, though I am aware of how "easily" a comment like that can be MISREAD. Personally, I feel that Microsoft (albeit the owner of the Operating System being "extended") should basically turn a blind eye and ADMIT that the userbase of such "extensions" is so TINY that said userbase DOES NOT cut into their "bottom line".

Sending an official letter and receiving the official letter are two different things. I have never been a fan of "extended kernels" but do acknowledge that there is a "communal need" for them. To me, even POSReady2009 is a "leaked" entity being ILLEGALLY used by "thousands". I myself would never provide GitHub with a "real" email address if I were publishing "extended kernels" of a Microsoft Operating System on a Microsoft-owned web site. I'd be better served customizing a shirt with a bullseye symbol and walking around with a picket sign to offend anybody and everybody that would see me carrying the picket sign.

What version are you using? Perhaps you are using a version that does not have all of the telemetry removed? A screencap of what you are seeing would help us assist you.