NotHereToPlayGames
MemberContent Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
I do not get that "useless update banner" in Ungoogled v118 either. This is either a Cent only issue (no interest in running Cent) or it's the user's profile/setup. I tried, in vain, to reproduce the issue and get that banner. Assuming 8 different browsers, old and older and older yet, on three different OSs but NOT trying Cent can be considered "in vain".
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Hmm. I actually went the other direction. And it is possible, will deep-dive this weekend, but it is possible that my ground-up profile-build process in Serpent/Basilisk uses about:config entries from my Pale Moon/New Moon original profile. Unsure. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I use my Serpent 52's Restore Session feature at least once a week. It has always worked and it has always filled in the table of windows/tab - BUT ONLY IF I USE A YEAR-OLD VERSION (which I am fine and content with). To me, this feature is a MUST because all all ALL of these UXP browsers have MEMORY LEAKS. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I'm a GIGANTIC SUPPORTER of PROXOMITRON !!! !!! !!! -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Hmm. I'll have to see if my *working* version from a year ago is grayed out or not. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Thanks for looking. Very strange indeed. I'll start again with a clean profile. Already did that twice but something is off. But okay with a year ago versions. Consistently. Hmmm... -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I forgot to report from home. I forget what the theme is called. Photonic, I think. But I also have a custom .css. Regardless, this issue of not filling in the table for the Restore Session is with an empty profile, no changes whatsoever from fresh-download. On every computer I've ever used Serpent on. But only "newer" than a year ago. -
I can't even get that banner in Supermium v122 in XP x86. No extensions. No nothing, just default everything. No interest in Cent Browser so did not try with it. I have to assume it's newer that v122, I get you confused with your "likers" but I thought you were against any browser more than a couple versions old. I don't even keep track of what version browsers are up to, this dog doesn't chase his tail.
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
These banners mean nothing. Or, better yet, "don't tell the whole story". This particular banner has NOTHING to do about your "browser" being out of date - I get no banner in 360Chrome 13.5.1030 (v86) faking a Win10 UserAgent. There are no ClientHints in 13.5.1030 (v86).
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Whatever happened to eclipse.cx?
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Chuterix's topic in Websites and Boards
I don't know if you do. Seems to me, strictly speaking as an observer, that you "get into it" quite often with those of differening perspectives than your "inner circle" (those that you "agree" with 100% of the time and "like" 100% of the time). -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I do not use a firewall, not even Windows' built-in firewall! Running a firewall SLOWS DOWN YOUR COMPUTER. Running anti-virus SLOWS DOWN YOUR COMPUTER. Running anti-malware SLOWS DOWN YOUR COMPUTER. I want NONE of that performance degradation. I prefer instead to run at peak performance but do so in an environment where "who cares" if the computer gets infected or crashes. I can reinstall EVERYTHING, right down to MANY MORE SETTINGS than the "average Joe", all in TWENTY MINUTES (my slower computers and hard drives take closer to 40 minutes, but you get the idea). -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
This feature works as it is intended in 2023-07-31 and then a week or two of releases after 2023-07-31. 2023-07-31 will have to be the end of the line for me if it cannot be fixed. No clue how to assist further. Only know that this issue remains an issue after an XP reformat/reinstall with brand new profile and this issue remains an issue after a Win10 reformat/reinstall with brand new profile. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I'm not going to use Windows Task Manager *TWICE* each and every time I want to restore previous session. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
That only gives me a Server not found. It is the Restore Session feature that is a "must" for what I use Serpent for. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I've reverted to 2023-07-31. There are slightly newer (but still a year old) versions where Restore Session will work, but my 07-31 profile was easier to update than starting all over just for the sake of a couple weeks of updates. No clue how to assist in debugging. All I know is that Restore Session does not work for me in WinXP on Intel Atom N450 and does not work for me in Win10 on i7-4770 and does not work for me in Win10 on Core2 Quad Q6700. And all three of these machines have this issue with each and every version since August 12, 2023. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
This continues to happen for me. 100% of the time on two different computers. Both have even been completely reformatted and reinstalled. Brand new profiles. The Restore Session's Windows and Tabs is NEVER populated! -
I kind of think that you are both missing the bigger point. You both tested the non-MSFN's post and made it past the captcha. ie, you willfully ADDED YOURSELF to Cloudflare's "database of pre-collected fingerprint hashes". Let's face it, if we were deadset serious about fingerprint prevention, we WANT the Cloudflare captchas to FAIL and we would NEVER reduce our defenses to make it past them, we'd boycott any-and-all web sites that requested a captcha (automated or manual). As is, TOO LATE, the fingerprint left behind TWENTY YEARS AGO, before any of us knew what a "fingerprint" even was and we only worried about "cookies", that fingerprint from TWENTY YEARS AGO is still contained in that "database". And, no offense, while *MY* view (below) of MSFN does NOT display profile pics, I still know that both of you have one. If that profile pic is really *YOU*, how can you seek to be privacy-conscious when your profile is a PICTURE OF YOU?
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
As far as JA3 is concerned, Ungoogled v122, Supermium v122, and Supermium v124 all behave identically. Refresh the above URL twenty times and you will get twenty different results. Do that test in Serpent 52 or 360Chrome and all twenty refreshes are IDENTICAL.
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Here's a Blast From The Past that you may be interested in -- https://www.defensive-security.com/blog/hiding-behind-ja3-hash I used to dive into all of this much deeper than nowadays. If you are on the internet, you have been fingerprinted, PERIOD. It's more about BLENDING IN WITH THE CROWD these days. Don't "block" these fingerprints, turn them into a blend-in-with-the-crowd instead. By "blocking", you stand out like a sore thumb, you've made yourself ONE in BILLIONS. Don't make youself UNIQUE, make yourself a blend-in. I thought we already went over this? Several times.
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Technically, NOTHING, not so much as even a "space". Because these both come in under IFRAMES and I block iframes by default. And, um, I don't see the point of turning off all of my default defenses just to see what I get then. But you don't need to load the full page if you want to test these across several browsers, skip the iframe and load the content directly. JA3 Hash: https://tls.browserleaks.com/iframe/ja3_hash Akamai Hash: https://tls.browserleaks.com/iframe/akamai_hash
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Nope. I measured with calibrated instrumentation.
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Me too! I only change one variable at a time and all I can tell you with 123,456,789% confidence is that this is not UACH-related.
- 105 replies
-
- crx
- Anti-feature
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with: