NotHereToPlayGames
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames
-
Sweet! Please let us know if you can track down the browser settings.
-
My Win10 laptop scores 140 both on direct-connect and on wireless.
-
I max the needle at 140 with the same exact laptop here at home. But it does break 300 at work. Perhaps the scale is different on different types of networks?
-
I use Ungoogled Chromium v97 on my Win10 and it scores 300 plus. It's the only browser I've ever seen break 300! Newer Chrome/Chromium's score lower so I've stayed with v97. My spreadsheets reference Speedometer 2.0, I did not know there was a 2.1 until just this week.
-
lol, was given to me for free when a neighbor installed WIN10 on it and then complained how slow it was. Works fine for XP, relatively speaking.
-
I'm over 12 minutes in (separate computer) and the test is still running on NM28. Yikes!
-
My oldest (without running to the garage and putting old parts together) is only 14 years old. eMachines T3656.
-
2.66 !!!??? Holy cow, Batman! It should be noted that the "Speedometer" test takes several things into account. I will get one result when running "fast" wi-fi, another result when connected directly to LAN.
-
This needs corrected to include a missing QUOTE (") at the very end of the user-agent line. Should read -- Parameters=--user-data-dir="%Profile%" --disable-logging --no-default-browser-check --disable-component-update --disable-background-networking --allow-outdated-plugins --kiosk-printing --disable-print-preview --cipher-suite-blacklist=0xe013 --disable-webgl --js-flags=--noexpose_wasm --user-agent="Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/107.0.5304.88 Safari/537.36"
-
Spoofing the useragent is old school. Some "modern" websites do not use your useragent but still know that you are using an "older" web browser. Etsy is using a "simple" user agent test - see next post for fix.
-
How well does Serpent 52, Serpent 55, BNavigator, New Moon 27, and New Moon 28 compare on your computer?
-
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Chrome variants cannot set the backspace via about:config. I am not familar enough with Serpent 52 and offered the solution I use in 360Chrome. Good do know there's an about:config solution for Mozilla variants. -
Aside from THIS is how this "argument" started in the first place. I obviously "failed", but the ONLY thing I was TRYING to do is to demonstrate that DcBrowser uses more RAM than 360Chrome. Nobody else seems interested in "that" for some reason. We all know that Chrome variants use a lot of RAM, no new "news" there.
-
I'm more interested in 360Chrome being compared to DcBrowser. Every comparison I've done has thrown DcBrowser right to the Recycle Bin shortly thereafter.
-
I currently use Chrome v97 on my systems with 32GB RAM. I have a couple PCs still on XP but I now run Win10 by default on most of my PCs.
-
Technically, this "debate" should NOT be about 360Chrome RAM on MY system versus 360Chrome RAM on YOUR system which is clearly not the same on both of our systems. Rather, FORGET "my system" versus "your system". I'm an Electrical Engineer - I know how to do "math". Not only that, I know how to twist statistics and can spot it when others twist statistics. What the "debate" should be about is this - compare RAM on YOUR system for 360Chrome and compare it directly to RAM on YOUR system for DcBrowser -- which one consumes less RAM on YOUR system? MY system and YOUR system are NOT behaving the same -- Q.E.D. But what I would like your next "project" to be is to compare 360Chrome on YOUR system directly with DcBrowser on YOUR system. Looking forward to your UNBIASED and OBJECTIVE findings.
-
Q. E. D.
-
Not familar with Process Hacker. Used it only because it was used further up in the thread. Why does it not report the same number as XP's own Task Manager as far as determining how much RAM is being used by any given process?
-
NOT TRUE. AND THIS FORUM IS NOT HERE TO CALL EACH OTHER "LIARS". You apology is accepted, whether you provide it or not. My 360Chrome v13.5 is clearly NOT behaving the same on MY SYSTEM as it does on YOUR SYTEM - "end of story".
-
My Browser Builds (Part 4)
NotHereToPlayGames replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Odd. Working for me in 360Chrome v13.5. This one does not work for me in 360Chrome v13.5.