AstroSkipper
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by AstroSkipper
-
I'm not sure. Sorry, it was A LOT time ago. I'd preffered to enable weak ciphers for use with IE5 in Win98... In my test of ProxyMII, I could see that TLS 1.0 and 1.1 protocol was disabled. Take a look at my screenshots some posts above! Presumably, due to security reasons. And that's fine with me. It was just a question for the reasons. Kind regards, AstroSkipper
-
Hi @Tripredacus, thanks a lot for your recommendation to change the title of this thread for being more specific! The person I was looking for has been found. And, maybe, it is also your merit. Therefore, thanks again! Kindest regards, AstroSkipper
-
ProxHTTPSProxy and HTTPSProxy in Windows XP for future use
AstroSkipper replied to AstroSkipper's topic in Windows XP
I hadn't had much hope that this would happen. But, from now on, we definitely have a proxy with TLS 1.3 protocol support targeting Windows XP. More details can be found in my thread: I'll keep you informed. Cheers, AstroSkipper -
Thanks a lot for the further information and for your reply! Your proxy ProxyMII is definitely great, and, after testing 3proxy, I'll decide which of your proxies I'll implement in my ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu for more convenient use, with your permission and with credits to you, of course. But, anyway, your proxy or maybe, your proxies will future-proof Windows XP in any case. And once again, many thanks for that! Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
Since when is the browser Brave compatible with Windows XP? AFAIK, the developer have neither supported this OS nor they'll do that in future times.
-
Take a look into the provided archive! The proxy ProxyMII does its job perfectly, but its handling is not as easy as in case of ProxHTTPSProxy. There are no typical executables in form of exe files. But it definitely works, and we now have TLS 1.3 in Windows XP itself. Unfortunately, the package is quite undocumented. For me, it isn't a problem, whether it is a problem for other users, I don't know. The proxy 3proxy I haven't tested yet, but I'll do that next, of course. But, so far, I am totally happy. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
A download link has already provided in the sixth post of this thread by @cmalex. Or what do you mean?
-
Hi @cmalex, thank you very much for your reply and your download link! I've taken a short look into it, and I have two questions. The version ProxyMII is written in Python, it has not been compiled to an executable exe file, and the proxy has to be executed by proxymii.bat. Is that correct? If so, could it be compiled to exe files? I would like to integrate it in my ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu, only with your permission, and credits to you, of course. In this case, a compiled version would be perfect and presumably, necessary, too. I am not familiar with Python, and therefore, I never compiled Python code, either. But, first of all, many thanks again for your report here and your proxies! Kindest regards, AstroSkipper Hi @cmalex, I tested your proxy ProxyMII last night! And I am enthusiastic! It works as it should be. And you are great! You disabled TLS 1.0 and 1.1 protocol due to security reasons. Is that correct? I provided screenshots of my tests in the posts before. I think I could implement this proxy in my ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu as it is, but in case of having compiled exe files, the proxy would be much easier to control. And the RAM consumption would probably also be somewhat lower. What do you think? Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
And, here is a screenshot taken from a test on the website of Qualys SSL Labs - Projects / SSL Client Test when using this proxy in New Moon 28.10.6a1 (:2022-07-06): Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
Hi to all interested members or visitors, I've tested a bit the ProxyMII version, created by @cmalex. And what should I say, it works. What does that mean? This ProxHTTPSProxy+Python3.7 version can establish a TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 connection to different servers or secure websites in Windows XP. Here is a screenshot of browserleaks.com when using this proxy in Iceape-UXP: TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1 has been disabled, presumably for security reasons. The proxy settings have to be set manually or using ProxySwitch.bat. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
As I always say, hope dies last! First, I'll test these proxies, and then we'll see what they do, and how they work. Maybe, a compilation to exe files is possible in the case of ProxyMII. But, you should never praise the day before the evening! You are a German, too, you know what I mean. Anyway, it would be great to have TLS 1.3 system-wide or local wherever it'd be needed in Windows XP. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
AstroSkipper replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Which conflicting prefs do you mean? -
Hi @cmalex, thank you very much for your reply and your download link! I've taken a short look into it, and I have two questions. The version ProxyMII is written in Python, it has not been compiled to an executable exe file, and the proxy has to be executed by proxymii.bat. Is that correct? If so, could it be compiled to exe files? I would like to integrate it in my ProxHTTPSProxy's PopMenu, only with your permission, and credits to you, of course. In this case, a compiled version would be perfect and presumably, necessary, too. I am not familiar with Python, and therefore, I never compiled Python code, either. But, first of all, many thanks again for your report here and your proxies! Kindest regards, AstroSkipper
-
360 Extreme Explorer Modified Version
AstroSkipper replied to Humming Owl's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
In Mypal 68, you can check in about:config the variables media.mediasource.enabled and media.mediasource.webm.enabled if they are set to true. And there are three more variables beginning with media.mediasource. Maybe, it helps. Cheers, AstroSkipper -
My Windows XP computer is equipped with only 1.5GB of RAM. And it's just SD-RAM. But in single-process mode, and using the cusom button memoryMinimizationButton and the tool Firemin, it's fine, so far.
-
@XPerceniol, did you try to make Mypal 68 as your standard browser? Or maybe, it depends on the location of Mypal folder. They are obviously different. I used the folder Portable, created by me, and you the standard program folder. And one other question. Why do you have a subfolder mypal in the Mypal main folder?
-
Yeah, you could do that. But I would recommend to export these entries into a reg file if you need to restore it.
-
As I mentioned earlier, I'm not a Python programmer. I have never learned or used this programming language. So, as long as there is no one taking a look into the provided source code of ProxHTTPSProxy and giving their assessment, nothing further can be done in this project, unfortunately. Just a reminder! Anyway, hope dies last! Kind regards, AstroSkipper
-
@mina7601, @dmiranda, thanks for your confirmation! @mina7601, you are right. These entries don't seem to contain any kind of telemetry. Here are my entries: [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Theodor2] [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Theodor2\Mypal] [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Theodor2\Mypal\Launcher] "c:\\Portable\\Mypal\\mypal.exe|Image"=dword:62a1c659 "c:\\Portable\\Mypal\\mypal.exe|Telemetry"=dword:00000000 "C:\\Portable\\Mypal\\mypal.exe|Browser"=hex(b):00,00,00,00,00,00,00,00 Other registry keys, belonging to Mypal 68, I couldn't find after searching in my registry editor. @XPerceniol, you can see I do have an entry belonging to the telemetry with a value of 0. This means the telemetry has been disabled. In your case, this registry entry does not even exist. Therefore, all is good, nothing to worry about. Cheers, AstroSkipper PS: And, from now on, one would probably have to set the Boolean truth value of the following equation to true: Theodor2 = Feodor2
-
Mypal 68 is not a portable browser. It creates a profile folder outside the main program directory and registry keys, too. Maybe, Feodor's real name is Theodor! I'll check for Mypal's registry keys, too, when I start my desktop computer the next time. But, don't worry, keep cool! Feodor2 is a good guy. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
@George King, maybe, this may help you to distribute your archive with language files: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/deploying-firefox-language-packs In this article, altough targeting an enterprise environment, a directory called distribution and a policy called RequestedLocales is mentioned. Maybe, it helps. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
Thanks for your information! I thought you needed it for private use. Enabling an installed language was no problem for me in Mypal 68.12.4b. But don't forget Mypal 68 is still under development, maybe a reason you have got problems, especially in preconfiguring such an archive. For example, Internationalization & Localization has not been implemented yet. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
I can confirm that VirusTotal's new interface fails again. A file can be uploaded, the service seems to check the hash, but this checking is never coming to an end. No hash of the file is shown. Tested in New Moon 28.10.6a1, latest build from 2022-07-06 with installed palefill 1.16. I already reported it in the issues of palefill on GitHub. In Mypal 68, it doesn't work anymore, either. Cheers, AstroSkipper
-
Copying the XPI files to the folder Chrome\extensions is enough? No editing of a file necessary? I didn't preconfigure one of these browsers in the past. I have not needed this so far. What about my suggestion to integrate a fully configured profile folder? Of course, you have to edit the file profile.ini to your needs in such a case, using relative paths only.
-
Hi @XPerceniol, SFX files are compressed archives that have been combined with an executable module, allowing Windows users to extract the archive's files without a decompression program. Additionaly, a script can be created and injected to perform during unpacking different actions. Such an archive can be unpacked in the same way as in the case of a ZIP file, too. (You can see the English lesson has paid off, Lol ).