Jump to content

vinifera

Member
  • Posts

    1,921
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Croatia

Posts posted by vinifera

  1. i have WAIK for Vista and vlite to remove some components from Windows 7 build 6801

    i choose to edit Ultimate version and do not use unattended section coz i read it may cause troubles

    but when i use vlited image in VM i get this:

    2vayxdj.png

    can someone tell why that happens ?

    Last_Session.ini

  2. hmm

    i might realy consider making new cd installation :D

    with (now burned) i struggled with space and now i see i can get more and use it nicely

    thanks for infos guys

  3. @redxii:

    i didn't said something is wrong, i just think that if theres even small chance

    that some file might be missing and some X game might need X component

    i do not wish to find myself to wait for some possible fixes but rather to use

    whole bundle (i know it is bloat) and be safe :)

    also regarding erasing these folders... "My BASE image is 383 megs" thats bizzare :D

    may i ask if vista has something simmiliar to remove to cut size the iso ? :P

    (i cant go lower than 1.3GB via vlite) :P

  4. regarding updates they are latest directx 9, windows installer 4.5 and visual c++ 2008 sp1 redist

    and ofcourse post SP3 hotfixes

    WMFDist11.exe is codec from WMP 11 that allows user to watch high quality WMV files (WMVA video codec)

    but it is NOT installer/upgrader for/to win media player 11

    i do not have any updates for WMP 11 since no point if OS dont have it :)

    but i do have these

    KB952069 Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Components Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Windows Media Format Runtime)

    KB954155 Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Runtime Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Windows Media Audio Voice Decoder)

    KB968816 Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Format Could Allow Remote Code Execution

    KB971557 Vulnerabilities in Windows Media File Processing Could Allow Remote Code Execution

    KB973540 Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Active Template Library (ATL) Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Windows Media Player 9)

    KB974112 Vulnerability in Windows Media Player Could Allow Remote Code Execution

    KB975025 Vulnerabilities in Windows Media Runtime Could Allow Remote Code Execution (Audio Compression Manager)

    Have you run nLite more than once on the same folder?

    i ran it twice

    1st time to make my tweaks

    then i exit and delete VALUEADD folder (to gain space back to CD size)

    and then 2nd time i just make ISO via nLite from that folder

    Are the files in the error messages really in your System32 folder?

    yes they are, all of them

  5. he can't :)

    and NO, anything from center and lowers makes slower seeking

    because your space is getting smaller and your files start to take more tracks

    so HD needle actualy has to seek more up and down

    while on the edge of disk you have plenty of lets call it wide space

    so less tracks are being used at "longer" space, so seeking is minimum

    as for MFT, no it is not centered, MFT reserves its space accordingly to system change

    sometimes its smaller and sometimes its bigger, its default setting is to be close

    to PageFile and be placed close to the edge

  6. i have fully automated unattended setup

    i use T13 stage via runonce (with batch file)

    to quietly install some components/updates and then suddenly reboot (shutdown -r -t 00)

    and just when Administrator account starts to load its settings OS normaly reboots

    but before it reboots some message pops up with error icon

    and i see (later) in event viewer an error which leads to file setuperr.log

    that says

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\mshtml.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\msrating.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\inseng.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\occache.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\webcheck.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\imgutil.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    Error:

    Setup could not register the OLE Control C:\WINDOWS\system32\pngfilt.dll because of the following error:

    GetProcAddress returned error 127 (the specified procedure could not be found).

    ***

    is this something critical ?

    can it be related to Visual C++ 2008 SP1 redist ? (i also add it to install in T13)

  7. i added new direct x 9 (100 MB), few portable apps (71 MB), + few new OS components (9 MB)

    in any case when all is finished as stated above true size is below 700

    but nevermind, i removed valueadd folder so its ok :P

  8. hi

    i plan to vlite Vista (home prem) SP2 (already integrated)

    but since SP2 came in year 2009, do i need to slipstream

    visual c++ 2008 redist and windows installer 4.5

    or SP2 already has all this things

    i checked ms download center and it doesnt show anywhere Vista SP2

    so i am wondering...

    ?

  9. ah nice its back to 695 MB lol

    just to ask (dont wish to open new thread)

    now when iso is made by nLite

    is it already bootable ? (it works in VM but dont want to waste CD to findout it isnt :P)

    and can i use nero to burn it (since nlite lowest speed is 16x and i want to do 4x)

    or it MUST be via nlite burned directly ?

  10. i make nlited XP and at the end folder is 696 MB big which is nice for CD

    but when i select nlite to create image it makes it 705 MB

    so what is so big that it has to enlarge the installation by 9 MB ?

    isn't just packing it into iso pure storage with some small compression ?

    it shouldn't be so big...

  11. hi & thanks for reply

    regarding post #6

    Another idea is to place the folder into your installed folder and use a DOS copy command placed in the RunOnce exit in the Unattended section to move it to your user account DeskTop

    wouldn't this only execute once and be worth only for current created user

    and not for future created ones ?

  12. heres the thing that bit bugs me

    in my custom installation i have portable program

    which instead its parent folder stores settings under Documents and Settings\Current User

    so naturaly whenever new account is created these settings would not be read by the program

    my question is, is there a way via commands to make winXP always copy specific folder/files

    into Documents and Settings\Current User, when new acc is loaded (when new account gets

    upon first run the Theme settings, profile settings and all that...)

    hope someone understands me :P

    any idea is welcomed

  13. i read in both nlite and vlite sections

    that if XP ISO is nlited under vista OS and vista ISO under XP OS

    that installing such installation goes wrong and people recommend

    to nlite under XP and vlite under vista

    so is this some OS rule or some limitation or doesnt have to be like that ?

  14. can someone explain me how can prefetch actualy speed up things

    if lets say user disables task scheduler (crappy service anyway) and doesnt defragment

    hard drive/partiton effectively

    i mean, MFT already contains position of files, and prefetch has the same but only with most used files

    so disk actualy has to SEEK-->MFT--->SEEK FOR PREFETCH LIST-->SEEK FILES

    and if disk/partiton is fragmented this would slow it down

    i always defrag my system partiton to have EXE and DLL files on outer tracks of HD so seeking is smallest

    and MFT is close to outer tracks too, without prefetch this is fast, but with prefetch its double the seek/acces

    or is my logic wrong ?

×
×
  • Create New...