vinifera
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by vinifera
-
-
just use r3dfox
they are doing great job, they track newest FF upstream and still make it work for xp, vista, 7+
dancing at version 128 now1 -
On 7/7/2024 at 7:47 PM, Andromeda43 said:
OH MY GAWD! I've never heard so much crap, from people who I would think know better. Maybe NOT!
I'm running the smallest and fastest MS OS since DOS 6.22.
this tells alot about "your knowledge"
On 7/7/2024 at 7:47 PM, Andromeda43 said:It installed in < ten minutes and is lightning FAST.
i installed XP in less than 5 minutes
oh wait yes... i modified it...0 -
tried Towel root ? (v3)
worked for my andro 4.30 -
there is somewhere a topic here on msfn forum
0 -
well in defence of windoze, NT is evolving system so naturally it became heavier
but this "heavyness" should have stopped after win7,
granted 8 was mostly invested in ARM code and again forced .NET what they called "UWP" back then
but with 10 and 11 oh my freaking gawd... garbage upon garbage
i know i've seen on some site dev commenting (think it is that chinese guy on ms blog) how many lines of code had vista versus 10
i think it trippled0 -
doubt you can
last time only XP SP1 could be bypassed to run as SYSTEM
and win7 SP1 - with some hacks as TrustedInstallerlater i never saw people mention it ever again :S
0 -
i don't think you can compare phone browsing and pc browsing
hence why mobile browsers go to m.website.whatever and pc do not
yes you can still use old browsers on phone and not much RAM
heck until recently i still used Opera that was ~11 years old for Android, 90% sites ran smoothlybut mobile sites were "made" for mobile browsing, not to mention most started for webkit anyway...
0 -
23 hours ago, anton12 said:
Here is a techno-philosophical question:
How could it be that we got along with 256MB - 1024MB(1GB)
RAM when NT5.0/5.1 dominated the web ?you can see this using Opera 11.x to 12.x for "WHY"
when "HTML 5" kicked in, new java-script engines had to be made
i remember that Opera strugled with this, hence why later it laged behind Chromium/Safari back thenwhat was implemented in processing JS with jumpt from HTML 4/CSS 2.3 to HTML 5/CSS 3 - i don't know, but it was heavy
and now you get everything RAM eating bullshido
true, RAM problem is not existant nowdays... heck my PC is 12 years old now but i have 8 GB RAM and browsing is not problem
but as quoter above said, back then we had 1 GB or 1.5 GB of it and WTF happened0 -
never used one/never had need for one
0 -
and backdoors
0 -
that was the case since win95
0 -
i'm very confused with all this x11 and wayland switch
some use it some dont, some partial (xfce)
many complain of waylanddon't even know what is better nowdays to use
0 -
so ad's bother you but the fact they can see what you have on your drives does not ?
1 -
-
3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:
Kind of. Goanna is a fork of Gecko.
If I remember correctly, Pale Moon has used Goanna ever since version 26.
Guanno
it is still outdated...
0 -
isn't palemoon based on ancient gecko version ?
0 -
mmm this fork caught my eye today
unlike librewolf, the newest "version" works on win7
me like it !
0 -
you'd better ask this on linux forums
0 -
tried latest Librewolf with this vxKex
keeps crashing randomly
0 -
if it would have infinite driver support i'd never stop using it
0 -
there is a big shift at now-days idiocracy / de-evolution
i guess it is only natural that we crave to stay in time when things were better for ourself'si still save some toys from my pre-teen years
last week i bought a board game i last played back in 1995 (they don't make them anymore)
i hold to my Sega Genesis (and bunch of cartriges) in closet, even if i know i will never power it up again2 -
simmiliar here, tho i'm stuck in mid 90-ies to mid 2000-ies
2 -
you won
0 -
actualy it could, if people stopped making gizillion distributions and just focus on 3 or 4
and naturaly lin foundation should change their crappy policy3
Future Of Firefox Quantum On Windows 7
in Windows 7
Posted · Edited by vinifera
trapezoids ?