jaclaz

Which means that the "risk" is more in the places you go than on any local exploitable vulnerability. But if you go to "some place" with another browser, you need to have it triggering the NOT used IE 5, 6, 7 or 8, in order for the vulnerability to be exploited, everything is possible, but it is not likely, as I see it. Personally, I like playing safe and have connected to the Internet 2K boxes with IE removed alltogether, but you know I am a dinosaur.... jaclaz

It could be any of four things (in my personal order of probabilities): "badly" slipstreamed SP3 however modified "improperly" SOURCE SP3 Russian Can you try a Russian "standard" SP2 to eliminate the SP3 and modified source variables? jaclaz

@cybercover The point is that: IF the drive is under warranty Seagate will EITHER: revive it give you a replacement In case #1 they WON'T guarantee that your data will be accessible (the DATA should get accessinble after the Fix, but they won't take any responsibility about this) In case #2 obviously you WON'T get your data back and since the drive you get back is another refurbished or new one you do not have a chance to recover the data. Otherwise they will try and recover the data (for a fair-to-expensive amount of money) through their connected Data Recovery firm, I365. It is entirely up to you, and of course it depends on the value you attribute to your data to: ask for recovery to I365 ask for recovery to another firm (usually you can find lower prices), and possibly you can find a recovery firm in your city, avoiding the risk of sending the disk drive back and forth try doing it yourself As a reference, this guide: http://www.mapleleafmountain.com/seagatebrick.html is very clear and complete. jaclaz P.S.: the 3.3V is OK

Yep, but apparently it has a dramatic effects: http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/sh...ead.php?t=48309 More here: http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...88984&st=47 jaclaz

Yep , the point I was trying to make is that if galahs doesn't use IE for browsing it is unlikely that any of the unpatched vulnerabilities (no matter which IE versions) will affect him. jaclaz

I guess it all depends on how one reads data. http://secunia.com/advisories/product/21625/ Unpatched 50% of vulnerabilities (IE8) doesn't sound that much "safer" than: http://secunia.com/advisories/product/11/ Unpatched 17% of vulnerabilities (IE6) Of course "only" 4 vulnerabilities unpatched are much less than 24. But it all depends which actual vulnerabilities are left unpatched, and the actual probability they can be triggered by NOT using the app. What about 5.0? http://secunia.com/advisories/product/9/ It is unlikely that given it's current usage it is targeted anymore: http://marketshare.hitslink.com/browser-ma...re.aspx?qprid=2 jaclaz

More loosely switching your PC on and connecting it to anything exposes you to attack/infection. IF the vulnerability(ies) affect exactly that area (of interdependence between OS and IE), which is NOT as yet clear, it may happen. But if we follow the official MS reply (at least the ones for the recent German government warning) all is needed is to set to HIGH the security level for browsing. And I haven't seen anywhere - and definitely not "certified" - that IE8 is invulnerable (or even safer than an updated 5.x or 6.x). Not to say that the MS guys are right (it would be the first time I would affirm this ) but maybe there is a bit of hype on this thingy right now. jaclaz

Isn't it a bit "drastic"? jaclaz

Possibly an unneeded "bump", but things have evolved and a brand new project for Windows 98 on Cd has started, right here: http://www.msfn.org/board/3-t140391.html&hl= Since the present thread comes out often when googling, I find cross-linking to the new thingy might be useful. jaclaz

Just for the record, not on the DOS/Win9x bootsector, and should not on any apps, but the NT bootsector does use some of the CHS data, on bothe NTFS and FAT32 partition type: http://www.911cd.net/forums//index.php?sho...1702&st=129 http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...=8528&st=21 However nothing of the above seemingly "justifies" the different number of used space , at the most it can explain why the scandisk warning/error. jaclaz

I am more coonfused than you when it comes to the commas, but there is the possibility to add a number of filenams to "validate" the Source. You should use this feature adding the names of the .cab files that you need as source. It seems like right now you have it "hardcoded" to <driveletter:>\Win98\ .... Also I see that you are using both IMDISK and VDK, which I find to say the least, "peculiar". Right now VDK is failing on my machine, as it happens from time to time if different issues of VDK are used. I will try after a fresh boot. jaclaz

But the project isn't , at least for me. FileRename - Failed to rename file: [%BaseDir%\Target\WIN98LIVECD\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\KOMMCTRL.DLL] to:[%BaseDir%\Target\WIN98LIVECD\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\COMMCTRL.DLL] :Impossibile trovare il file specificato Maybe there are some pre-requisites that I completely fail to see anywhere. The: should mean that it is completely foolproof, possibly it isn't or I am more "fool" than you might expect. jaclaz

To be picky : #1), the CA-42 and similar cables are not "COM1" and not "RS-232" they are simply USB to TTL that simulate a "RS-232" by creating a "virtual" only COMn port. #2) can be bought allright, instead of "home made". As well, #3) an RS-232 to USB converter cable (from ebay or other source) is NOT useful alone. The HD needs a TTL interface. If you have a "real" RS232, i.e. a real COM port, you can use a RS-232/TTL converter. If you have only USB you can use a USB/RS-232 converter AND a RS-S32/TTL converter. If you have only USB, you can use a USB/TTL converter (like the Nokia CA-42). jaclaz

Why? jaclaz

Another proof that my crystal ball is out of tuning: http://web.archive.org/web/20020824011356/...t/dossierNS.asp It has a SIS 630 128 graphic card. It is actually a Clevo: http://hemmerling.free.fr/html/en/table10.html http://www.clevo.com.tw/en/index.asp IF the video card is on a module you may try finding a replacement (or a whole working board) on e-bay or similar. Attempting a repair is probably beyond normal DYI possibilities and normally not worth it from professionals (example): http://www.clevoweb.co.uk/repairs%20and%20...oards/2200T.htm If your screen and hinges/chassis is ok, looking for a functional notebook with broken screen, example: http://cgi.ebay.it/Notebook-Clevo-Gericom-...=item1c0f6fcd56 could be the easiest solution. jaclaz

The MBR is a non-bootable one. (containing the string "Pen Drive Without Operating System.Remove Pen Drive And Reboot. "). The partition is a FAT32 0C type, NOT Active, with really "weird" CHS/LBA data Entry Type Boot bCyl bHead bSect eCyl eHead eSec StartSector NumSectors #0 0C 00 0 3 4 242 121 58 192 15673152 The CHS/LBA data is NOT "balanced", AND it breaks any known "standard" or "convention". If we give as "good" the CHS, the LBA should be 192/3.895.219. If we give as good the LBA, the CHS should be 0/3/4 975/158/15. The "right" values should be: 0/1/1 974/254/63 63/15663312 The PBR it's a "normal" FAT32 bootsector invoking NTLDR, but it uses a geometry of 128/63 instead of the "usual" 255/63. It is not strange that any tool/utility reports "something wrong" in the boot DATA. jaclaz

HI, FDV. The files should be downloadable right now, however you can download a copy from here: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=M3D9KUMR Here are the posts that you should read first: http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...=3717&st=31 (possible evolutions) http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...=3717&st=47 (base bulding setup) http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...=3717&st=63 (links to add mouse support) http://www.boot-land.net/forums/index.php?...=3717&st=68 (add USB support) As is, it is pretty much reserved to "knowledgeable" people, and since it uses the XP embedded minlogon component I doubt it can become "mainstream" any soon. So I guess that first step would be to restore the use of "normal" Winlogon, something it's months I would have liked to try doing, but that simply could not find time to even attempt. (and it is not to be taken as assumed that I have the "right" kind of knowledge to succeed ) What I am (very, very slowly) working at is booting it as HD image with grub4dos+firadisk, as to have a really "portable" mini-system. Anyway, hope that at least it gives you some ideas. Cheers, jaclaz

I seem not to find the specs for that model, most probably it has a "more complex name". Can you point it out? : ftp://ftp.viglen.co.uk/files/Notebooks/ jaclaz

JFYI: http://www.reocities.com/mfd4life_2000/ often works, learn more: http://www.reocities.com/ jaclaz

Yeah, it happened to my parka too : http://www.sickathanaverage.com/.a/6a00e55...866d1970b-800wi In the case of the parka it was the video card, and since it happens to both internal and external screen (you should actually see the inside of the parka ) I see no reason why it shouldn't be the case with your laptop. Let see if my crystal ball is tuned, post the exact model of the laptop, I can see that it has a Nvidia Geforce Go FX video card, possibly a 5700 (it could also be a 5200, the ball is slightly foggy around the actual number).... Now seriously , a number of videocards on laptops suffer from a problem due to bad BGA soldering or overheating, effect is anything from what you described to a complete blank screen. jaclaz

TODISK (MS-DOS / Win9x_MS-DOS_BOX): http://johnson.tmfc.net/dos/todisk.html Partition Saving: http://damien.guibouret.free.fr/en/index_frame.html Roadkil's Diskimage: http://www.roadkil.net/program.php?ProgramID=12 jaclaz

Well if you want 100%, there is NO KNOWN way. No matter what bootmanager. jaclaz

Can somebody please answer. I am badly stuck. If you would be so kind to tell us what a SMPS is (should we know? ) it could help. jaclaz

There is no problem in making a setup so that 2 partitions are visible and 2 partitions are hidden, and choose which "couple" is visible and which is hidden when booting, but when you connect the drive to the "third" OS, let's say the XP on your friend PC, it will see EITHER one or the other "couple" of partitions, unless you use some tool (which you will have to have on BOTH couples of partitions in order to make sure that one is always visible) to hide/unhide the "other". I hope the sequence is clears if we call the first two partitins "XP1" and the second two "XP2", when booting you can choose to see "XP1" or "XP2", this setting is "sticky" until mext reboot, thus if you switch the system off when "XP1" was visible and you put the drive in your friends PC, only "XP1" will be visible (unless you use something to "change this situation). You do not even need a bootmanager, (if you want one, I can suggest grub4dos) http://diddy.boot-land.net/grub4dos/Grub4dos.htm but a simple "special" MBR should do: http://mbldr.sourceforge.net/ I have no idea what level of experience/knowledge you have of these tools or of these approaches, have a look at the docs in the meantime, then ask your questions. jaclaz

Boy how do I hate "philosophical" questions. The ones that have as subject "File A", "Directory B" and "Program C", and a "certain OS", and "another OS" Which actual, real OS is "OS1"? Which actual, real OS is "OS2"? You see, different OSses may have limits that could prevent the use or one or the other bootmanager, or a given partition order, and what not. Also, different OSses may already come with their own bootmanager capable of doing all the work. An OS (depending on WHICH OS it is) may be able to access the "other OS", another one may not. Boot virii tend to be pretty much OS agnostic, though. And which is the third OS that should see the 4 partition? How do you want them seen "untouched", modifying the disk is allowed, iusage of a program is allowed.... Can you post a detailed example of WHAT you would like to do? jaclaz