bphlpt

I might be wrong, but it seems to me that many of the (new) folks that post asking how to get rounded corners act like Big Muscle can do something to Aero Glass to just magically make rounded corners in whatever theme they are trying to use. But the way I understand things, is that if the theme and/or theme atlas that is used with it, doesn't have rounded corners then there is absolutely nothing that can be done in Aero Glass to create rounded corners on its own, correct? Or am I just confusing myself? Cheers and Regards

Did you try both with and without the "return;"? And what did you mean by: Sorry to be a pest. Cheers and Regards

OK Weird logic, but by all means stay with what works. It does seem especially weird to me that any change in "PauseInstaller()" can cause a "dhtmlxwindows.js" error, since "PauseInstaller()" is not mentioned in "dhtmlxwindows.js". Out of curiosity, could you please try this, both with and without the "return;" and see if it works? function PauseInstaller(){ if (UserPaused) { WriteRegKey("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\WPI\\UserPaused",0,"REG_DWORD"); document.getElementById("Pause").innerHTML=getText(btnPause); } else { WriteRegKey("HKEY_CURRENT_USER\\Software\\WPI\\UserPaused",1,"REG_DWORD"); document.getElementById("Pause").innerHTML=getText(btnResume); } UserPaused=!UserPaused; document.getElementById("AbortButton").disabled=UserPaused; return;}You know how I am about always wanting the code to be as minimal and logical as possible. I think it makes it easier to debug. And, I hate to be a noob about hta javascript, but in Installer.hta, why are there so many '<script type="text/javascript"> ... </script>' blocks? Why isn't all the javascript code collected all in one place and surrounded by a single set of '<script type="text/javascript"> ... </script>' ? Is there some kind of advantage of doing it the way it was done that I'm not aware of? Cheers and Regards

I don't think you need that "return", do you? If you don't need one in the "else" you shouldn't need it in the "if" either, unless there is something else in the function that you are not showing. Cheers and Regards

Now??? LOL I've taken that approach for YEARS! Cheers and Regards

@Aloha, I don't think NoelC meant to insult you, I think he merely mistakenly blended your comments and that of the OP in his mind and responded to the combination. The OP got the message, so all is good. Cheers and Regards

There are certain updates that cannot be installed on an offline image and must instead be installed at RunOnce, ie on a live system. I would advise not using RT7Lite anymore, since it hasn't been updated in several years, and instead use a more up to date tool like Win Toolkit, which knows about such things and will put those updates where they will be automatically installed correctly for you. Cheers and Regards

@DosProbie, Am I correct that all lines that have the Remark marks, ie <!-- whatever -->, will not be executed, as if they are not there at all? So the only reason you leave them there is for convenience? If you need to make any changes, you don't need to remember the format of the various command lines, just remove the Remark marks and fill in the "blanks". In your case, your effective config.xml could be rewritten as: <Configuration Product="ProPlus"> <Display Level="none" CompletionNotice="no" SuppressModal="yes" AcceptEula="yes" /> <Setting Id="SETUP_REBOOT" Value="Never" /> </Configuration>since those are the only lines that will actually be used. If I have that right, then the OP's problem is that his config.xml was really "empty" and might as well have not even been there. Do I understand how that works, or am I missing something? Cheers and Regards

Welcome to MSFN, belatedly, Jody! I have enjoyed interacting with you. Here's to your continued involvement. Cheers and Regards

And that was? Cheers and Regards

So, what did you figure out, exactly, for the possible benefit of the next guy that has this problem so they don't have to figure it out for themselves as well? Cheers and Regards

It sounds like this is still a warez version of Windows, or at least one that you have never registered and activated. If it is a warez version we will not help you with this. Cheers and Regards

The thing is, I don't think that 'wpi greensuit' is a product of the OP since the whoever makes 'wpi greensuit' obviously doesn't need any help in finding, making, and adding the icons for each of the software choices. Apparently the OP just wants to know how to make his instance of wpi look like that one. Why he chose a warez release as a model I don't know. Whether to make a warez release of his own, or ... Cheers and Regards

That's what I was thinking. I don't see a single app listed in the OP's image that is a free app. Cheers and Regards

mega links do work in Opera 19 and Opera Next 19, I just tried it. (Yes I know. That's really quasi Chrome.) I'm guessing mega is depending on HTML5? Anyway, it seems it likes all of the newest browsers. Cheers and Regards

AFAIK, IE10 is the only browser that mega doesn't work with. Cheers and Regards

The next step is to read ALL the links that jaclaz pointed you to. In fact, read them all three times. Only after that, before you do anything else, come back and explain, in detail, exactly what you believe is the situation with your drive and what you understand are the steps, in order, you need to take to fix or analyze the situation further. But if the situation is that your BIOS can see the drive but Windows can not, then your post does not belong in this thread because you have a different problem than what is being discussed here. Start a new thread somewhere else instead. Cheers and Regards

I would like to see screenshots, before and after, showing what this does. Cheers and Regards

Imgus definitely looks like it has a lot of options, but I agree that Hover Zoom is a lot simpler in action. I think I'll keep Imgus disabled, and maybe removed, and keep using Hover Zoom for now since I'm not having any issues with unwanted ads. Cheers and Regards

Thanks. EDIT: I didn't end up having any add related stuff in the extension, but then it stated in the docs that there wouldn't be any if something like AdBlock was used. Nice to know everything worked together. I disabled the affiliates anyway. No sense leaving any doors open that aren't necessary. Cheers and Regards

Where exactly? I'm using various ad blocking extensions, host files, etc and haven't seen any ads, but I'd like to make sure I don't see them in the future and I don't want them slowing me down, eating my bandwidth, compromising my privacy, or getting in my way. Thanks in advance. Cheers and Regards

By all means it is better to stay with what works, but that is very odd and I have no idea what is causing it. Thanks for all you testing Kel. Cheers and Regards

If you checked the hash of all three files, I would bet that they are identical copies, named that way because they don't fit the 8.3 standard. I think you can simply delete the two copies that you are not using. Cheers and Regards

If this works correctly: var timerID=null; timerID=setTimeout("ins_iTimer()",1000); // Update displayI think that could be replaced by: var timerID=setTimeout("ins_iTimer()",1000); // Update displayCheers and Regards

AFAIK, changing: var txt="";...elapsedSecs=elapsedSecs - (minutes*60);var seconds=elapsedSecs;txt=((hours < 10) ? "0" : "") + hours;txt += ((minutes < 10) ? ":0" : ":") + minutes;txt += ((seconds < 10) ? ":0" : ":") + seconds;to: ...var seconds=elapsedSecs - (minutes*60); var txt=((hours < 10) ? "0" : "") + hours + ((minutes < 10) ? ":0" : ":") + minutes + ((seconds < 10) ? ":0" : ":") + seconds;will make the code a tiny bit smaller and possibly immeasurably faster and not cause any problems. I don't see how it could cause "mshta to burn CPU cycles and random lock ups on multiple sub process installers". The only thing you are changing is the the assignment of value to two variables.Cheers and Regards