Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/06/2019 in all areas

  1. As some of you know, I'm a broadcast engineer and I work as encoder on a broadcast channel. This time, we were shooting a report on healthy food and one of our reporter has been discussing this matter with one of the experts in the field that works in a lab and makes analysis on milk and other things. I was kinda surprised when I found out that the computer they use to run tests on the analysed samples is actually running Windows XP: This made my day.
    4 points
  2. I was recently on a tour to Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant and saw some PCs running XP
    2 points
  3. True enough. Let's move on. It's OK by me. And, BTW, welcome to MSFN!
    1 point
  4. That's why I recommend using both. I haven't used any version of Windows as my main OS since December 2005. I have Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows 8.1 all running in VMs (I use VirtualBox). One of the advantages of doing this is that I don't have to use Windows 8.1 any more than necessary, which is good because I don't like using it. I'd much rather use Windows XP. I also don't have to worry about looking for newer hardware that is still compatible with Windows XP since I'm not trying to run it on "bare metal". Phil
    1 point
  5. With all due respect, let me tell you what: ProxHTTPSProxyMII (available from @heinoganda by request via PM) provides full certificates (ciphers) and TLS 1.1/1.2 (although the latest updates have now solved the TLS issue) for both IE8 and other browsers (esp. Chrome 49). Thence, Chrome 49 / ProxHTTPSProxyMII fully solve the HTML5 issue. @roytam1's New Moon and Basilisk/UXP (best, IMO) also do solve the HTML5 and cipher issue, not requiring the addition of ProxHTTPSProxyMII. So I think we're pretty well covered on this matter. IMO there isn't any real HTML5 / cipher / TLS issue with XP at the moment. Moreover, @heinoganda also has been providing a certificate updater for the root cerificates and a flash updater specific for Chrome 49, allowing it to remain easy to use and functinal. Using IE8 just for MU/WU and either the latest Basilisk/UXP or Chrome 49 / ProxHTTPSProxyMII has provided me a fully satisfactory browsing experience up to now, and I bet it'll continue so for as long as @heinoganda and @roytam1 kindly keep on supporting the community with their awesome work.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...