Leaderboard

Calm down folks!

Unfortunately NO. You would have to contact the owner of the server hosting the web site. Maybe if you get THOUSANDS of users of that web site to protest, you could get the owner to remove it. But I do assure you, the owner implemented it for a reason. All SERVER-SIDE reasons.

I don't have the space to leave all previous builds in place. I could do something like this: https://files.videohelp.com/u/69760/ffmpeg-win32-XP-shared-latest.7z https://files.videohelp.com/u/69760/ffmpeg-win32-XP-static-latest.7z Two additional archives with a static name that would always match the latest uploaded version.

Fixed.

Wise choice; and you should probably stay there, too... Based on my most recent tests, the only logical conclusion. Words of wisdom ! This kind of "wisdom" is due to the fact that newer versions are no longer tested for performance to the same extent, and certainly not on older operating systems, as everything has become very fast-paced and there is no real interest in real optimisation, given that most users have such powerful hardware that they no longer even notice such software flaws. Yep, very hot here but I think that’s nothing compared to the temperatures you usually get in Greece. Kind regards

FYI, from now on, you can find links to all my YouTube projects in the third post of this thread.

Hello @Reino! Is there already a new address for your great releases? 🤔

Thanks for your releases and for adding ffplay! Please keep it alive! ffplay is a great media player , and my next release of ytBATCH for Windows XP will use it as I implemented a MediaBrowser in the form of a BAT file. BTW, do you also provide static urls to your XP releases?

Up until now, there has been no reason to use quickjs in combination with yt-dlp.exe. I use yt-dlp.exe in many places. Primarily, of course, in ytBATCH for Windows XP, in VLC with Lua scripts, in 3D YouTube Downloader and so on. In what situations do you need quickjs?

If it makes any difference, the "missing-titlebar-bug", https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/177 https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/issues/147 , is caused by a change between v151.0a1-v4 (last GOOD build of the 151 branch) and v151.0.2 (first BAD build of the 151 branch); so, not that big of a "regression window" to dissect ...

Just like me ! Bravo and Upvote !

Did you try to reduce the quality ? like 360p or 480p ? BTW , it's no wonder newer chrome will consume more RAM , besides yuotube will load much more bloat/scripts if it sees a newer browser useragent.

Of course it will work fine with or without them , it seems realy strange why you (quite often) think that I will suggest something not working , lol. OK , good , I understand you trust nobody , right and quite fine by me ! This result is weird , though . Perhaps it has something to do with XP ? This may explain why the other XP users , like the previous one , have crashes with youtbue and I do NOT . What to do ? Try to replace manifest_version : 2 with something non-existent , like manifest_version : Y or manifest_version : 9 , try to just type in some rubbish into the key :"wvcwevr67ki67n=bk878ckwb" . The general idea would be NOT to remove them completely , but to let the browser think they are still there but NOT valid (version mismatch , etc) and get back to me with the results . I'm sorry if I shall not reply fast . Like I said , I'm having rough sunny days , lol.

Open this .pak file in any HEX propramme and choose "position" / "go to offset" , dial 13022 and it will bring you to the extension master key.

@XPerceniol , to answer your question , I suggest to use the free COMODO firewall for your XP system. Older versions like 5.x . You can easily define what to block in the section "Network security policy" and choose any rule , port , etc.