Leaderboard

Here are some facts about the sizes of SUPERAntiSpyware's virus definition files from 2024 to 2026: SASDEFINITIONS.EXE 210,345,304 bytes 07.07.2024 SASDEFINITIONS.EXE 214,737,232 bytes 27.05.2025 SASDEFINITIONS.EXE 353,800,400 bytes 23.01.2026 The virus definition file SASDEFINITIONS.EXE has increased by 4,391,928 bytes from July 2024 to May 2025, which is a normal increase of approx. 2% within 10 months. From May 2025 to January 2026, however, it increased by 139,063,168 bytes. This is an unbelievable increase of approx. 65% within only 8 months and definitely a no-go. The file has become totally bloated for whatever reason. Now, I finally know why the download takes much longer time than before, apart from the catastrophic download speed on their update server, which is used by the programme.

It used to be (intentionally) broken to burden (very high CPU usage) the csrss.exe service (as seen in Task Mgr). I've installed Avast (from v18 online installer) in my testing XP_VM and will tell you tomorrow. Today everything was calm. Avast and AVG in their new, broken, state begin to burden the system through csrss.exe the next day...

I don't know about American phone numbers but you should know that. The number is (801) 523-6766.

Speaking of latest antiviruses, has anybody tested the latest Avast database definitions for v18? I know they have discontinued the XP compatibility check recently, but i'm curious if Avast can be still used as a real time protection AV? I'm not a fan of cloud only protection like Panda, even though currently it's the best solution for antimalware protection other than SUPERAntiSpyware (the definition updates are still being released, just checked on my XP x32 VM), which is fine for me. If only i had a key for Pro edition...

First of all, thanks for uploading the files! I was surprised to learn that there is supposed to be a .NET Framework version 4.0.30320 for Windows XP. I couldn't find anything about it in any official source. In any case, your installer "Microsoft .NET 4.0.30320 Full" is the same one I have, and it has the number 4.0.30319.1. Presumably, at least for Windows XP, there is no version 4.0.30320. You can find out your current version installed with the following command: reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\NET Framework Setup\NDP\v4\Full" /v Version Although it is actually Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0.30319, I have nevertheless found a reference to version 4.0.30320 in Windows XP. Apparently, the Client Profile and the Extended are assigned exactly this version number:

I am very interested in both since I have none of them. Can you upload them in any way?

My .NET Framework 4 is version 4.0.30319. Where does yours come from? Do you have a link or the installation file?

Did you activate the 30 days trial?

That was of course clear. But which one of the legacy versions?

I didn't notice any problems while installing or uninstalling. About running for a longer time with real-time protection I can't say anything but the portable installation can't produce any compatibility issues. BTW, my Malwarebytes Premium 3.5.1 installation still exists on my Windows XP partition.

@Dave-H The more recent portabel versions create a sub-directory called RogueKiller with some files, i.e. settings, logs, reports and signatures inside. But they do not load any drivers which, however, are necessary for real-time protection. Apart from that, I already posted a screenshot of the main interface of the portable version where I marked red: Schutz in Portable-Modus nicht verfügbar which means translated: Protection not available in portable mode. BTW, I found this in their changelog: Although the most recent installer version 16.5.4.0 wasn't able to load its driver when I tested it, it is possible that some previous installer of version 16 still work under Windows XP, even if the Adlice homepage now requires Windows 7 as a minimum requirement. Have a look here: Maybe. it is again an issue of the free version. What you can do is to try out the most recent installer version or a previous one as a 30-day trial version. Then you will definitely know and can report back here.

Yes. Try a quick scan and you will see. The real-time protection is not available in the portable version, even using the premium one.

But only in the hope that the older installer versions will continue to be supported and supplied with signatures. You buy a license, but the current installer can no longer be used under Windows XP. The portable version is unfortunately restricted compared to the installer one.

You can't directly find such links on their homepage. I checked the current links and replaced the file name to the one I wanted. Here is a link to their portable 32-bit version 15.19.2.0: https://cloud.adlice.com/owncloud/index.php/s/QE2fq4D24A1IKEb/download?path=15.19.2.0&files=RogueKiller_portable32.exe. I checked the most recent version again. The installer version 16.5.4.0 doesn't work properly under Windows XP but the portable version 16.5.4.0 still seems to work.

What do you mean by this version?

But the free versions of RogueKiller Anti-Malware don't offer any real-time protection. And they are quite restricted. They don't even offer a custom scan in the free version. If, for example, you want to perform a scan on drive c: only, you have to be very tricky. In any case, it can't be a replacement for Malwarebytes Premium 3.5 unless you purchase a licence.

That would be too easy, reminds a second grader school project. And most importantly, why would someone do that for a member who is not here for a year? Probably already forgot and chills somewhere on Bahamas. Last but not least, ask the admins to look at the logs! They will show real IPs.

I have a rather low reputation. Please stay on topic, don't be jealous. We can ask the admins to transfer my rep to you, if you're that unhappy about it... But views, I'm afraid, are not transferable.

Please give links to that statement! I might have missed.

Oh, I see. Thanks for the clarification! @NotHereToPlayGames, I'm afraid you're wrong. There's no relation between likes and views. When I put several likes in one topic, to either one or different members, it was counted as one visit, the same would have happened if no likes were distributed at all. Clearer now?

You're drifting off-topic. Likes are a different matter, topic and profile views are generated automatically, but seems like the counter just stopped. I'm a young woman, and not familiar with US country music from the sixties-seventies.