Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/23/2025 in Posts
-
Terrible article. The main info is missing! In which version they started to force it?!! Not to mention the author's terrible English.2 points
-
First, it's 5 years, not 1. The browser has a 2020 engine, it was released in 2020. Second, no, and I quote: "I WILL NOT BE MAKING IT PUBLIC". Source: https://msfn.org/board/topic/186346-i-moved-to-centbrowser-i-feel-happy-about-it/page/5/#findComment-1277544 My humble opinion about that: https://msfn.org/board/topic/186346-i-moved-to-centbrowser-i-feel-happy-about-it/page/6/#findComment-12775772 points
-
Wait, what? No sandbox!? Geez! And what if it runs on Nvidia driver? It doesn't work, even in this case? I'm just trying to figure out why no sandbox, the reason, as it's considered to be a serious security flaw.2 points
-
At the moment, I have reverted to the last officially compatible version 1.46. But I will test the 1.56 version again. Thanks for the hint! @feodor2 I moved to the most recent, final version of uBlock Origin which is 1.62 at the moment. The logger works fine in multi-process mode but in single-process mode, the logger popup window is very unstable. Some extensions, scripts and whatever else interfere considerably with the loading and display of the logger popup. It often remains empty. Resizing the logger window helps in some cases. I investigated this further and found that changing the advanced setting loggerPopupType from popup to normal may be a solution. In this case, the logger is opened in a normal window in which it loads fine as far as I could see until now. At least, on my computer with its current configuration. I'll keep an eye on that.2 points
-
It's what agendalists stuff in your brain, it's not your problem, ignore everything what is not your problem. They off-load their work on civilian population. EDIT. You need to fight the depression with fun, we talked about it.1 point
-
It's not "different" it's another question, lol. I'd say, probably, even most likely, because Germany now includes the Eastern part - GDR (DDR), The chance of him blocking W. Germany before 1990 was extremely high, also he indeed didn't want to loose the auditory of millions of Russians that now reside in Germany. https://www.ncesc.com/geographic-pedia/why-do-so-many-russians-live-in-germany/1 point
-
JFYI. much modern version of this pack is available now: http://sweetlow.orgfree.com/download/usb20_win9x.zip1 point
-
You just violated the rule by writing "Disagreements". You disclosed that I was not agree. I, on the other hand, only cited the public name of the discussion, and not private opinions. Please stop it and get back on topic.1 point
-
I asked whether it changed, not the actual figure, please don't make a show out of it. For example, here we had a slight price increase when those new "ecological" Euro norms were introduced. I don't need your super secrets, no need for a PM. Just say, did go up? If so, tell the percentage, thanks.1 point
-
Not necessary - here the custumbutton already published by you /*Initialization Code*/ var prefName = "security.csp.enable"; var enabledImage = ""; var disabledImage = ""; this.onclick = function (aE) { if (aE.button === 0) { Services.prefs.setBoolPref(prefName, !Services.prefs.getBoolPref(prefName)); setSelfImage(); } }; function setSelfImage() { if (Services.prefs.getBoolPref(prefName)) self.image = enabledImage; else self.image = disabledImage; } setSelfImage(); replace "security.csp.enable" with the desired thing Toggle CSP is a custom button I created for only toggling one preference in about:config and made it available almost two and a half years ago. To be honest, there wasn't much interest in this button. And your suggestion to use this button as a template is a little off the mark. Toggling the browser.tabs.remote.autostart preference has no direct effect while the browser is running and can't be a solution as you actually should know. More steps are to perform. If you compare the two buttons, you should notice that the PMT - Process Mode Toggler custom button has a much more complex functionality than the Toggle CSP custom button. BTW, I have revised the Toggle CSP custom button some time ago and designed it so that the manual switching of the security.csp.enable preference, for example, in about:config is also registered by the custom button to always display the correct status via the button image as well as via the button tooltip, even in such or similar cases. However, the PMT - Process Mode Toggler custom button does not need such modification, and thus, I have already removed it again, as solely toggling the browser.tabs.remote.autostart preference has no effect on the current browser session in terms of its process mode. Why to tease then? Teasing? I do not tease anyone. I just demonstrated what custom buttons are capable of, and I made it clear to think about publishing if sufficient interest was shown. No more, no less. However, I cannot see this at the moment. And to be honest, I don't know what your problem actually is. Regarding the PMT - Process Mode Toggler custom button, which I already made available for you only, I am the creator and decide for myself if and when I publish something. Just like you do when it comes to Mypal 68. One thing is clear: you are you, and I am me. No pills will help. @feodor2 If you want to tell me something specific, you should articulate it as clearly as possible. I’m not a fan of reading between the lines or subliminal hints.1 point
-
Then you simply haven't read many of the posts in this thread and in my thread about UXP browsers. FYI, I have neither ruled out nor promised a release of the PMT - Process Mode Toggler custom button even though I generally create custom buttons for personal use. I have written at least six new custom buttons for Mypal 68 in the last few months. And long before that quite a few for the UXP browsers. After releasing some of them, I could not recognise any significant interest. BTW, I have also deepened my JavaScript and CSS knowledge considerably to modify already existing UC.JS scripts and especially to create new ones from scratch. Both are in full swing. It should be mentioned at this point that everything is purely self-taught. Programming is just a hobby of mine. I never learned it professionally. Anyway! Due to a lack of real interest in legacy custom buttons, it seems pointless to me to publish my custom buttons at the moment. I have put it in a nutshell here: Apart from that, I have already published so many different things in this forum that it is difficult for me to keep track. But I don't necessarily have to publish things that nearly nobody appreciates or wants to use. That's exactly how I see it. But we are probably the exceptions here. And then the user would also have to familiarise themselves with the special JavaScript language and its syntax provided by the Custom Buttons extension (there are commands and variables that do not exist in the standard JavaScript language) ... After all, a similar button as a template for a desired one is not always available. Long story short: the ball is now in the court of the readers of this thread.1 point
-
Good news for all those who intend to use KeePassXC instead of KeePass. Thanks for the deeper insights! I am very satisfied with KeePass, though. Thus, I will stay with it as long as it works. I personally do not need any new features. But it is good to know there are alternatives.1 point
-
Maybe, you try for example the extension KeePassXC-Browser in version 1.8.5.1 for Firefox 67 and up instead of the more recent ones for Firefox 96 and up. Reducing the minimum Firefox requirements inside webextensions rarely works.1 point
-
TBH, I personally am completely satisfied with Kee. And KeePass also works well without Kee if you only retrieve previously saved login data. I never tried the combination of KeePassXC-Browser and KeePassNatMsg. But thanks for the insights when trying to fix the code! BTW, I avoid all webextensions which need an additional exe file in Windows due to their restrictions in Chrome/Firefox/Mypal 68. I don't like that at all.1 point
-
1 point
-
You misunderstood the joke completely. Those with high CPU oughta try h264ify extension, I think there were links at my account, sorry don't have them at hand right now. Or download from github. https://github.com/erkserkserks/h264ify1 point
-
1 point