Leaderboard

That's because "safe browse" is totally disabled in Ungoogled. So you might as well catch a virus. I understand, it can be over-protective at times.

They are well aware of the problem, and, for now, this flag is the only solution for XP users, https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/discussions/995

"Google Safe Browsing from Supermium. It blocks downloading VxKex Extended Kernel for Windows 7 (https://github.com/i486/VxKex/releases/tag/Version1.1.2.1428) and considers it a virus." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1080

I had dropped Opera porting, don't wait, so as Balunovich, as it seems. Why? Opera is simply way over-bloated now, too heavy, versions come out as hot pies. Probably the reason Supermium will stay at this old version, and only later will skip to 13x.xx, during the next year, as win32 declared at github.

I wish too, not happening, I just looked at his github, which I hadn't done in a year, it's simply too much to do on the first priority routine, and he's alone. Get back to me in case you find a good replacement with the normal brightness. Thanks.

Thank you for the advice, but no, I don't install custom fonts, otherwise the system would be compromised and prone to more extensive fingerprinting. What I love in Chinese browsers (Cent, CatsXP), they try to already include most fonts and certificates within them, it's not the case with Supermium, unfortunately.

So you emptied the bin, too?

disallowedcert.sst changed

It's unclear to me which item in the v3.9 release notes is responsible, but I appreciate that the green progress indication in taskbar icons is more noticeable now. Not as glaring as it was before the taskbar was replaced, but less subtle than the ultra-narrow green strip approach. Merry Christmas.

I'm just glad he's OK.

Yes, it does. Here's the explanations. AA increases linear brightness by 21%. Thick fonts don't need that amount of AA, hence less bright and stay darker. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/page/95/#findComment-1276059

My eyesight is indeed getting worse, I of course meant compensate, sorry fellas.

Thanks for the explanations! I have a PRO grade monitor with 97% NTSC colour coverage, despite being old, it doesn't cut corners on the accuracy, I replaced all caps to Epcos (ex-Siemens). It's now flawless, I have zero brightens troubles with Brave, CatsXP, Cent is a bit brighter, but it's tolerable. Basilisk/Serpent/New Moon, never heard of them. Supermium is way OFF, like you said, about 21 percent. Probably, the reason many don't notice is their BAD/cheap/old/out-of-specs LCD and/or poor eyesight due to the old age. I don't need that 21% added brightness.

Do you know where to edit the RGB values in Chrome? https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/page/95/#findComment-1276047

Go to your monitor and start adding the brightness slowly, see how the fonts become thinner and more washed out, so you would need to complicate with your contrast, But in most modern cards - you can't, because the plonkers already set it beyond the reasonable limit in the card BIOS. I had analysed many BIOSes, and in nVidia the RGB values can easily be at 157%, instead of the standard 50. It's called brightness wars, for the people to get a false feeling of the beefy and juicy card they bought.

I use post Windows 8.1 CentBrowser, long after this old OS was abandoned, and while Supermium is indeed totally modern and flat, just like you wrote, how did they manage to keep all the curviness in CentBrowser? It looks just like the old chrome we all knew. And no matter how many times I read about the plans of getting the old theme to Supermium, its each new version becomes more and more flatter.

Yeah, for you, yes, But I don't understand Chinese (or Korean?). I can't even distinguish those two. Besides, I heavily damaged one of my eyes, and only one can see somewhat well. Probably, will have to resort to the operation.

still working with $DAYJOB, and for builds because there is lack of upstream changes. BTW I do plan for an update to my legacy browsers addressing some NSS related bugfixes and cert updates, but no ETA at the moment.

Oh yeah, the standard changes almost every month, and they also say "enabling both Kyber and ML-KEM simultaneously (e.g., as an interim phase until Kyber768 is completely removed) would mean the client sends an additional 2,432 bytes (1,216 for each plus 32 bytes for a fallback X25519 keyshare)." https://www.netmeister.org/blog/tls-hybrid-kex.html

Tommy now also shown as a Canadian. The previous location was showing as USA. https://msfn.org/board/profile/279129-tommy/ Probably, the forced flags update just grabbed the real location IP? Not the one members choose.

I do not get this attitude, seriously. You act like we all collectively p***ed in your porridge or something, when we ask about some features being changed or missing. If the thread is such a garbage dump, whatever that means to you, you can chose not to answer. But instead of you act bitter and make people who actually paid for your software and who ask actual questions in regards to it, feel like they wronged you in some way. Silly attitude, in my humble opinion. The same with deleting posts just because you don't like the questions. Not to mention the double standards, the entire software is about modifying the start menu, taskbar and some other features, but somehow, when some people ask for some features that were present, they are told said feature "breaks functionality" or changed functionality, well doooh, that's the purpose of the software. Yet some other requests are implemented, those apparently do not break functionality and do not modify functionality. You could simply say you do the software as you like, which is fair, in which case, put it in the rules and that's it, no requests, only report bugs. So many ways to make this happen without the p*** poor attitude. Nobody forced you to open this garbage dump thread, nobody forced you to offer support anywhere but on the official email or whatever.

Actually, is 11,763,650 (January 2024). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Belgium And most of internet users are on their phones, especially those born after 1997-2000.

Yes, and the majority of them is being rich. Probably, 10-15. I think, closer to zero, read the first sentence of my reply. It's only a handful of die-hard old computers lovers, everyone else just buys new and shiny, hence no need of Supermium or the such.

No, when I allow "variations" fingerprinting to get executed, I have a different tag, not like on the picture you shared with us, and then deleted with the wise advice by @Dixel.