+1 ; in fact, I am indifferent to the whole "rebranding" hullabaloo ; personally, I know very well where I first learned about the existence of the Pale Moon fork (yes, that's what it is), i.e. this very forum/thread, I know very well where the compiled builds are hosted and where to download them from, I am well aware of @roytam1's GitHub repositories and blog, so I'd have to be senile to direct myself to one of the upstream sites for official support (especially given the fact how rude/hostile people there are to "intruders" ); OTOH, taking into account how similar the code is between PM and the fork in question, I have every right - if I wish to do so - to visit the official Pale Moon forum as an unregistered user and seek help there by searching already posted content; and, provided I have access to working official binaries, I might post an issue in the official github tracker (given I already have a GitHub account) if a bug I discovered in NM is reproducible in official PM; I won't, of course, make any mention of the fork on a non-supported OS; NB that Moonchild doesn't like people "littering" his tracker before the reported "issue" has been first filtered in his forum, but that's his own problem... To conclude, that is how far I would approach the official support avenues...
... New-name giving and artwork? Fine, if you like to occupy yourself with what is devoid of real substance ; there, I said it...
(DISCLAIMER: No offence meant to members about to - once again - inundate this thread with new candidate browser names )